Topic of “Chemtrails” Discussed at United Nations Global Warming Session

[ClydeCoulter]

Topic of “Chemtrails” Discussed at United Nations Global Warming Session

Topic of “Chemtrails” Discussed at United Nations Global Warming Session

The article is from Feb 25, 2014 (today) but apparently the UN video is from 2007.

http://chemtrailsplanet.net/2014/02...sed-at-united-nations-global-warming-session/

 

[Zippyjuan]

Radio interview with the same woman- Rosalind Peterson. See 1:55 in.

"And I can tell you that in ten years of research, other than aluminum coated fiberglass chaffe releases by the US military, I have no proof whatsoever that the jets are releasing anything but jet fuel emissions".

 

[ClydeCoulter]

She's only stating that proof of what is tied to who is not there.

If you watch the OP video, she states that there are some 50 companies, research firms and government entities doing the spraying and testing. The difficulty in a suit is trying what chemicals to what agency. Which is what is needed to make a lawsuit.

Try listening to the rest of your video, also.

 

[Zippyjuan]

You would think that after 90 years of contrails, somebody would have hard proof of chemtrails. Earliest known report dates from 1918. http://contrailscience.com/pre-wwii-contrails/

 

[Fox McCloud]

You would think that after 90 years of contrails, somebody would have hard proof of chemtrails. Earliest known report dates from 1918. http://contrailscience.com/pre-wwii-contrails/

I encourage anyone and everyone to check this out who might be on the fence about chemtrails vs contrails. The map that accumulates the past 24 hours worth of flight data, then presents it, visualized...easily demonstrates why contrails appear in so called "patterns"...and are not so out of the ordinary.

 

[UtahApocalypse]

The problem with chemtards is that they think every single contrail is a chemtrail.

The reality is that most chem spraying would never be seen.

 

[kathy88]

I encourage anyone and everyone to check this out who might be on the fence about chemtrails vs contrails. The map that accumulates the past 24 hours worth of flight data, then presents it, visualized...easily demonstrates why contrails appear in so called "patterns"...and are not so out of the ordinary.

Then explain how the sky over the closest airport to me will have up to 30 or more of these trails visible at one time when maybe a total of 15 flight a day go in and out of that airport?

 

[ClydeCoulter]

The problem with chemtards is that they think every single contrail is a chemtrail.

The reality is that most chem spraying would never be seen.

First off, perhaps you have interviewed a lot of "chemtards" (whatever that means in your mind) and all of them have said that everything coming from the back of air plane is a chemtrail, but I have never met one.

Second, do you have any documents or other proof or knowledge that chemicals are being sprayed at those kinds of altitudes that can't be seen, perhaps for purposes with mixtures that would not create or leave visable elements? That would be interesting to know about.

 

[donnay]

This is normal air traffic patterns over US Skies? I don't think so.

 

[eduardo89]

You all stocked up on vinegar, donnay?

 

[ClydeCoulter]

You all stocked up on vinegar, donnay?

*video removed for brevity*

Surely you can find someone eating garlic while wearing a tin hat in a full duct tape suit spraying vinegar into the air? That would prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that everyone who can see with their own eyes and spends time observing is an absolute lunatic! Come on, you can surely do better. /sarc

 

[Deborah K]

Can someone explain to me why there was a trail last week that made a 90 degree turn and then lingered in the sky for hours until it became a thin cloud-like layer? Contrails disappear rather quickly behind the plane. I know. I've watched them.

 

[eduardo89]

Can someone explain to me why there was a trail last week that made a 90 degree turn and then lingered in the sky for hours until it became a thin cloud-like layer? Contrails disappear rather quickly behind the plane. I know. I've watched them.

On days when cirrus cloud formation is occurring, there is more moisture in the upper atmosphere, and consequently, contrails may linger longer before evaporating. Since cirrus clouds often precede a general overcast or haze, the casual observer could easily assume that the contrails have caused the overcast, or become the overcast. The persistence of contrails varies with weather conditions: sometimes they dissipate almost immediately, but often they will persist for hours, with crossing trails sometimes forming gridlike patterns that stretch from horizon to horizon. The "chemtrails" label is usually applied to these longer contrails, with their very persistence put forward as "evidence" that they cannot be normal contrails.

 

[klamath]

Can someone explain to me why there was a trail last week that made a 90 degree turn and then lingered in the sky for hours until it became a thin cloud-like layer? Contrails disappear rather quickly behind the plane. I know. I've watched them.

Do clothes dry faster on a dry clear day or when a heavy fog is around them?

 

[Deborah K]

Do clothes dry faster on a dry clear day or when a heavy fog is around them?

Explain the 90 degree turn.

 

[eduardo89]

Explain the 90% turn.

The wind blows pretty strongly at 20 - 30,000 feet.

 

[Deborah K]

On days when cirrus cloud formation is occurring, there is more moisture in the upper atmosphere, and consequently, contrails may linger longer before evaporating. Since cirrus clouds often precede a general overcast or haze, the casual observer could easily assume that the contrails have caused the overcast, or become the overcast. The persistence of contrails varies with weather conditions: sometimes they dissipate almost immediately, but often they will persist for hours, with crossing trails sometimes forming gridlike patterns that stretch from horizon to horizon. The "chemtrails" label is usually applied to these longer contrails, with their very persistence put forward as "evidence" that they cannot be normal contrails.

Can you have different weather going on at the same time? I've seen two planes going in the same direction, different altitudes, and one trail dissipates while the other lingers.

 

[Deborah K]

The wind blows pretty strongly at 20 - 30,000 feet.

No, that wouldn't explain this. There were other trails that day, crisscrossing, and one made a 90 degree turn. And it wasn't heading back to the airport, it went out toward the sea.

 

[donnay]

 

[klamath]

Explain the 90 degree turn.

Wind shear. Winds are not blowing in the same direction at all altitudes and locations. If a plane flies through the shear (where the wind changes direction) the resulting straight contrail will bend. Have you ever read a winds aloft forecast?