We should be letting Rand know now.
If Rand doesn't already know then he will never be president.
We should be letting Rand know now.
Just noticed that. I've never been a big fan of LE myself. Months ago, in a thread I started called, Adam Kokesh unloads on Benton, Wead, Official Campaign. He/she respponded,
This was after I posted a video entitled, Tom Woods Slams Jesse Benton, with the caption, Should there be a "Fire Jesse Benton" grassroots moneybomb?
Because starting a thread such as that about a member of the campaign was not only immature, it was ignorant! Other campaigns were all over this forum, in addition to the media.
Maybe you should had been the Campaign Manager?![]()
Bentonism :
is the playing down of Ron Paul’s most popular and important ideas,
the impatience with and purging of people who champion those ideas,
and an obsessive eye to GOP respectability.
Is that what the “liberty movement” is? Then count me out.
I want to urge people not even to consider donating to anything with his name on it. []
Incidentally, if Rand Paul intends to run in 2016, the single most effective way he could convey to the public that he is not really serious, and that people should withhold their donations, would be to hire Jesse Benton.
Where is that coming from?
It comes from you hovering over independent individuals who have a first amendment unalienable right to speak their minds. If anyone has an opposing opinion that you do not agree with, we get the Forum Nanny first degree on how we are hurting the campaign or not toeing the party line. You have spoken several times in this forum of your disdain for Adam Kokesh, Alex Jones, Jesse Ventura, and others in the liberty movement. Sounds much like the things Jesse Benton did in this campaign, as campaign manager.
I dunno...just an independent observation?
What I do know for sure is that there are a whole lot of massive egos in this movement and also some who make their living off of it. Sometimes, I wish we could go back to the days that we had in the first campaign, when everyone was in this for one reason and one reason only. To get Dr. Paul elected. Do some of you remember those days? We never wondered about ulterior motives. Maybe people hadn't figured out at that time that there was money to be made off of it, I don't know. But, there didn't seem to be nearly as much backstabbing; at least until the end.
Let me get this straight. If you libel Rand Paul, or other people's chosen path in getting liberty candidates elected, you would prefer if I just sat there and shut up. Sorry, but that isn't going to happen. However, if you wish to stop it, it is in your hands. Stop bashing.
Oh, I got it somewhere between the 1st time you and your buds said it and the 500th time.LMAO...now it's libel? LOL!!
Can you possibly come to grips with the idea that some here do not like Rand's endorsement of Romney?
Well, I'm thinking those who called him a TRAITOR, were kinda bashing him.It's not bashing.
It doesn't mean anyone HATES him.
It's not an attack on you.
It's not an attack on those who wish to work within the GOP.
And it most certainly is NOT libel.
Hyperbole much?
We really need to regroup, '08 style.
Incidentally, if Rand Paul intends to run in 2016, the single most effective way he could convey to the public that he is not really serious, and that people should withhold their donations, would be to hire Jesse Benton.
Comments are closed.
Oh, I got it somewhere between the 1st time you and your buds said it and the 500th time.![]()
Well, I'm thinking those who called him a TRAITOR, were kinda bashing him.
Surely, you jest. How many times have you and your crew talked about how stupid it was for anyone to keep working inside the GOP?
lol...and even more truth comes out.
anybody still want to keep their heads in the sand about this?
Obviously, you don't.Oh, I got it somewhere between the 1st time you and your buds said it and the 500th time.![]()
Yeah, I saw that in the first few days after the endorsement. Emotions were running high, and some of us were stung by this...very badly. I still disagree with his decision, and I'm not sure I'm ready to fully trust him right now, but I'm not calling him a TRAITOR. I may even end up supporting him if he runs in 2016...but we have to wait and see what happens between now and then.Well, I'm thinking those who called him a TRAITOR, were kinda bashing him.
*sigh* Calling an action "stupid" (working within the GOP) is not the same as calling YOU stupid. I'm not even sure I've used the word "stupid"...I would be more likely to use "ill-advised" or something to that effect.Surely, you jest. How many times have you and your crew talked about how stupid it was for anyone to keep working inside the GOP,
LE, I'm at a loss as to why you persist in making stuff up about people who disagree with you. I haven't "ridiculed those who refuse to throw Rand under the bus because he endorsed Romney". If you want to support Rand from now until forever, that's your decision and you're welcomed to it. (I'm a libertarian; I don't force my opinions on others). But YOU, on the other hand, cannot stand that ANYONE ELSE ON THIS SITE may have a different opinion of Rand. You follow people around and DEMAND that they STFU if they say something negative about him...yes, I said it reminds me of someone with a schoolgirl crush on him. That may be ridiculing but it's not because you refuse to throw him under the bus...it's because you act like a momma bear whose cub has been insulted whenever someone sees him differently than you do.or ridiculed those who refused to throw Rand under the bus because he endorsed Romney?
It would be nice if we could see some from you once in awhile.Honesty much?