Today Ron Paul on Alex Jones Show, Time, TBD, 11am - 2pm CT

[John F Kennedy III]

Noone is concerned RP is going on Alex Jones when he is just becoming mainstream?

Wow. That's pretty damn stupid. Talk about giving them ammo, hell we're loading the mags for them. Very, very stupid move in my opinion.

I have been from the start. Paul's link to truthers and other conspiracy nuts gets created by things like this. He can say he doesn't agree with things like that as much as he wants, but as long as he associates with people like Alex Jones, the accusations will fly. The campaign needs to get serious and stop with these kinds of appearances. It was semi-understandable back in 07 when Paul couldn't get on real shows very often and just wanted to get some sort of coverage, but now there is no reason for this.

*raises hand, shakes head

I don't understand this move at all. WHO exactly is AJ's audience...seriously? Wouldn't that time be better off going on a show in Iowa/New Hampshire?

This might hurt us, hopefully they plug the moneybomb enough to offset the free ammunition the MSM will accumulate

Where can I find more of those people? They sound better than the lose-at-any-cost people in this thread

Now I get it. Its rather unfortunate though. If he gets high enough in the polls this is the stuff his opponents will attack him with.

First thing I thought when I saw the thread. I'm not sure about this judgment call, being on this particular show at this particular point in time.

You never want to give your opponents the opportunity to paint you as guilty by association if you do not have to.

Alex Jones sucks

Same here. Also, acting like AJ is a good target audience to go on, makes no sense to me. If AJ is speaking the truth already, then his listeners should already support RP, unless I'm missing something?

Unlike Alex Jones, my support, financial or otherwise, is not conditional on having Ron Paul come on my show to talk about false flag terror

Enough with the sensationalist language bs

It DISGUSTS me that some of Paul's supporters need to have him on a radio show that could provide attack ammunition to other candidates and debate moderators when they could do just as much moneybomb promotion without it

This is why we don't need a December surprise: https://twitter.com/#!/ppppolls/status/146655829494472704

President Paul could do us all a lot more good than former-candidate Paul

You should probably review mentions of Alex Jones in the mainstream media (the media the majority of the American continue to receive their news from).

Obviously not, is this a discussion forum or a "only-say-things-I-agree-with-otherwise-I'll-call-you-a-coward" forum.

And I'm not saying we don't want AJ's audience's money, I'm saying it shouldn't be conditional on having Ron come on to discuss said issues.

That said, I was voicing my concerns BEFORE AJ confirmed he was talking about Fast and Furious and not 9/11, so I don't see why you still have a problem with my voicing concerns which have been somewhat alleviated. Who knows, maybe the collective concerns of us "anti-AJers" actually made a difference

If we have another moment like this it will hurt the campaign in my opinion:

This is such a horrible idea...

How many of you were critical of the people President Obama associated with that were considered extreme during the last election? In what sense is Alex Jones not extreme?

If we want to sway establishment type: AJ is not for us. If we want to sway Tea Party type: AJ is not for us. If we want to sway conspiracy theorists who share in AJ's theories, then ok. But I think the numbers favor the other two.

Does Ron Paul want to win this election cycle or not?

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[ONUV]

face palm

first the glee comment, now this.

 

[Anti Federalist]

face palm

first the glee comment, now this.

You didn't read the thread, did you?

 

[PatriotOne]

Very conflicted here. Why wasn't there any mention of the moneybomb in this interview? I kind of assumed that was the main reason RP went on the show this time (with the timing and all).

 

[John F Kennedy III]

face palm

first the glee comment, now this.

sigh

 

[donnay]

Here it is one more time:




Awesome interview!

 

[John F Kennedy III]

Here it is one more time:




Awesome interview!

Agreed. I love the interview

 

[flybeech]

I've listened to Alex Jones for many years and he's had nothing but good things to say about Ron Paul the entire time. I'm a little surprised to see so many people so harshly judge Ron Paul for his decision to appear on a radio show that is truly a friend of the Ron Paul campaign.

Maybe those who mistrust Dr. Paul's judgement for appearing on Alex Jones would do well to find another candidate who appears for interviews on shows less offensive to them. I'm sure Newt or Romney would NEVER appear on the Alex Jones show.

Say what you want about me....I like both Alex Jones and Ron Paul.

 

[Carehn]

I've listened to Alex Jones for many years and he's had nothing but good things to say about Ron Paul the entire time. I'm a little surprised to see so many people so harshly judge Ron Paul for his decision to appear on a radio show that is truly a friend of the Ron Paul campaign.

Maybe those who mistrust Dr. Paul's judgement for appearing on Alex Jones would do well to find another candidate who appears for interviews on shows less offensive to them. I'm sure Newt or Romney would NEVER appear on the Alex Jones show.

Say what you want about me....I like both Alex Jones and Ron Paul.

I hear ya knocken, but never tell people to find a different candidate during a campaign. Its bad form and no good can come of it being meant as an insult or humor.

 

[John F Kennedy III]

Ron Paul dropped major truth bombs in this interview

http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-defense-bill-establishes-martial-law-in-america/

http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-fast-furious-a-criminal-false-flag/

 

[sparebulb]

Why all of the fear from RP appearing on AJ's show today? This is probably only the 50th time he's been on Alex's show in the last decade.

They've tried to hang 911 Truth and a quote from a newsletter from 20 years ago on RP, to no avail. The media hates alternative media personalities way more than they hate RP, so there is not much chance they would ever utter the name Alex Jones in the media. Except in the case of little-watched hit pieces like "The Rise of Right Wing Extremism" and similarly titled propaganda. The dinosaur media is not going to risk further loss of viewers to the alternative (credible) media, by bringing further attention to it.

 

[garyallen59]

All ye dissenters...

You should really give Alex a chance. I just started listening to him a couple of months ago after years of writing him off. Though i do cringe when he goes on rants, he never really goes on about baseless things as you may imagine; he usually is able to present sources for all information he gives out. Only on occasion have i heard him present information without a hard source like when he talks about "Mr. L" who is a credible source within the elites, and the stuff "Mr. L" says isn't even that hard to believe such as oil prices rising, etc. Overall I have found Alex to be a very credible source of news and honestly a quite entertaining host.

 

[PatriotOne]

Here it is one more time:



Thanks for the interview. Just got done listrening to it. It was a first class interview. Seriously top notch. I'm still stunned there was any mention of the moneybomb though.

 

[Polskash]

Drudge links to his shit all the time. What's the problem here? Ron has already had that label attached to him...

 

[Carehn]

All ye dissenters...

You should really give Alex a chance. I just started listening to him a couple of months ago. Though i do cringe when he goes on rants, he never really goes on about baseless things that you would imagine he usually is able to present sources for all information he gives out. Only on occasion have i heard him present information without a hard source like when he talks about "Mr. L" who is a credible source within the elites, and the stuff "Mr. L" says isn't even that hard to believe such as oil prices rising, etc. Overall I have found Alex to be a very credible source of news and honestly a quite entertaining host.

As far as contend goes I think Alex is the best ever.
I give him an A- as far as being entertaining.
And a D+ on how he treats callers.
C on interviews.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Welcome aboard.

So many people say the same thing about his rants.

That's precisely why I listen to and enjoy the show.

All ye dissenters...

You should really give Alex a chance. I just started listening to him a couple of months ago after years of writing him off. Though i do cringe when he goes on rants, he never really goes on about baseless things that you would imagine he usually is able to present sources for all information he gives out. Only on occasion have i heard him present information without a hard source like when he talks about "Mr. L" who is a credible source within the elites, and the stuff "Mr. L" says isn't even that hard to believe such as oil prices rising, etc. Overall I have found Alex to be a very credible source of news and honestly a quite entertaining host.

 

[donnay]

Here it is one more time:



Thanks for the interview. Just got done listrening to it. It was a first class interview. Seriously top notch. I'm still stunned there was any mention of the moneybomb though.

I tried, I sat on hold hoping he would take some calls but he didn't.

Maybe I will try back tomorrow.

 

[JulioForPaul]

Sorry. Alex Jones is a total nut. The only real problem I have with Ron Paul are the segment of followers that are nuts who like Alex Jones. I really think it will prevent Ron Paul from having a real chance to get the nomination. I felt this way in 2007 and I feel it's true now. I don't think some of you people really understand the impact you have when you support Paul and have ...these insane conspiracy bullshit "bilderburg" ideas. It's off putting to put it politely.

 

[Tinnuhana]

Alex: "I really, really REALLY am going to get to your calls..."