Tired of RP Supporters' Economic BS

[krazy kaju]

You know, I'll tell you what I am tired of...

Copy and Paste "experts" like this clown with a Firefox browse and a few Cato papers on his tabs.

You can smoke them out of their holes with a few very simple questions that they seem absolutely incapable of answering...

"I'm a traveling assclown, and according to my definition of what a "free market" is, and my definition of "monopoly", I can't be touched, because they cancel each other out!"

Rothbardians can eat my ass. I tried to be reasonable. This fledgling blister of pseudo-intellectualism is a toolshed of stupid.

You have not challenged ONE of my refutations of your contentions. You refuse to debate, instead playing a game of definitions and throwing around insults. I have not copy and pasted one thing, I have not called myself an expert, but you challenged me to a debate and I stood up and refuted every single one of your contentions.

Then you switch to some odd "what do you propose in place of a free market model" bullshit. What is that even supposed to mean? Where have I proposed anything besides a free market? Furthermore, how is the free market an economic model?

Then you switch to asking me to define a monopoly. If you had the reading comprehension of a seven year old you would've comprehended what I was saying in numerous previous posts.

You're just one giant progressive tool, a socialist in sheep's clothing. You don't even know what you're talking about. Every single response you've made has been besides the point and filled with racial hatred, ignorance, and insults.

Just GTFO.

 

[Kade]

No, because you never shut up. All you do is open your mouth and talk trash.

Back your claims up with something. You've never provided one piece of evidence to support anything you say and then you insult people. Again, you should be banned.

You don't know what you're talking about here and google isn't going to educate you. You're ignorant and insulting and I'm not saying that to put you down. It's a fact.

If you're going to spew garbage everywhere and make ludicrous claims be prepared to back them up. Just because you say something doesn't mean it's true.

 

[krazy kaju]

DOES AN ENTERPRISE THAT HAS LESS THAN 100% OF MARKET SHARE EVER COUNT AS A MONOPOLY?

You are thick. And I mean really **cking thick man.

Did you pass first grade?

Read the damn thread.

 

[rockandrollsouls]

This could be one badass debate if you two would quit the namecalling and define some terms.

IRO, you clearly don't read through posts. In one post you criticized me, yet you didn't even read it fully. You might want to go take a look at how I responded if you never did. Kaju has been articulate and precise with his argument. All Kade does is stick his fingers in his ears and whine.

I suggest you post something productive or refrain from fueling the fire. Kaju could teach a class with his postings. He knows what he's talking about.

 

[rockandrollsouls]

Put up or shut up, Kade. You've never defended any of your positions. All you can do is argue aimlessly and blindly. It's obnoxious.

Posting rude pictures and insults doesn't validate any of your opinions. If anything, it discredits you more than you've done to yourself. Want to know why you have so many enemies on the board? Look at the ignorance you've shown. Are you still in high school, Kade?

 

[Kade]

You have not challenged ONE of my refutations of your contentions. You refuse to debate, instead playing a game of definitions and throwing around insults. I have not copy and pasted one thing, I have not called myself an expert, but you challenged me to a debate and I stood up and refuted every single one of your contentions.

Then you switch to some odd "what do you propose in place of a free market model" bullshit. What is that even supposed to mean? Where have I proposed anything besides a free market? Furthermore, how is the free market an economic model?

Then you switch to asking me to define a monopoly. If you had the reading comprehension of a seven year old you would've comprehended what I was saying in numerous previous posts.

You're just one giant progressive tool, a socialist in sheep's clothing. You don't even know what you're talking about. Every single response you've made has been besides the point and filled with racial hatred, ignorance, and insults.

Just GTFO.

Alright tooly, let's start over.

Real simple here... like a nice warm bath...okay chief? This ought to be easy for you...

You ready?

Is it conceivable that a monopoly can exist if it does NOT have 100% of the market share? In other words, is there a threshold for sufficient control over a product or service, or for that matter information?

 

[Kade]

Put up or shut up, Kade. You've never defended any of your positions. All you can do is argue aimlessly and blindly. It's obnoxious.

I haven't taken a position yet you troglodyte.

 

[Kade]

Kaju could teach a class with his postings. He knows what he's talking about.

 

[Kade]

Did you pass first grade?

Read the damn thread.

You don't get it. You don't refute someone by pointing them back towards your copy and paste jobs...

Sorry. This one you will have to think of on your own chief... you can do it.

 

[krazy kaju]

Kade, seriously. READ THE DAMN THREAD.

But since I don't want your idiocy filling another two pages with "define monopoly," I'll spare you the supposedly intellectually challenging process of reading a few posts.

Technically speaking, a monopoly cannot exist unless it has 100% market share. But as I've stated time and time again, it is impossible for a company to have "monopoly control" (i.e. controlling prices) without 100% market share. This leaves us in the same exact place we've been 10 or so pages ago, so I guess I'll have to ask you the same exact question I've been asking you all along.

Can you provide one example of a single business, corporation, etc. being able to corner the market and unfairly dictating prices in a free market?

 

[krazy kaju]

You don't get it. You don't refute someone by pointing them back towards your copy and paste jobs...

Sorry. This one you will have to think of on your own chief... you can do it.

Where have I copy and posted anything?

Stop spewing shit out of your mouth, it's unhygienic.

 

[Kade]

Where have I copy and posted anything?

Stop spewing shit out of your mouth, it's unhygienic.

Sigh.

 

[rockandrollsouls]

Alright tooly, let's start over.

Real simple here... like a nice warm bath...okay chief? This ought to be easy for you...

You ready?

Is it conceivable that a monopoly can exist if it does NOT have 100% of the market share? In other words, is there a threshold for sufficient control over a product or service, or for that matter information?

All you need to do is look up the definition of monopoly to answer that question, Kade. You're just being ignorant. You're throwing around terms dealing with monopoly, but you don't even know what it means.

Monopoly - a market in which there are many buyers but only one seller
Monopoly - Exclusive control by one group of the means of producing or selling a commodity or service
Monopoly - A monopoly is when a business, usually a large corporation, is the only provider of a good or service. Monopolies are usually bad for an economy because they restrict free trade, which allows the market itself to set prices.

If you are the only one who produces and sells a computer, don't you have 100 percent of that market share? I mean, come on. It's one thing to not understand, but you're being blatantly ignorant...or you can't read. It's in the darn definition if you take the time to look it up.

 

[IRO-bot]

IRO, you clearly don't read through posts. In one post you criticized me, yet you didn't even read it fully. You might want to go take a look at how I responded if you never did. Kaju has been articulate and precise with his argument. All Kade does is stick his fingers in his ears and whine.

I suggest you post something productive or refrain from fueling the fire. Kaju could teach a class with his postings. He knows what he's talking about.

If I have I have forgetten it. Link it for me if you could be so kind. You are fueling the fire too with your insults to Kade and manloving to Kaju.

I haven't made a claim about Kaju not Kade. I know they both are highly intellegent. They both need to calm down. I know Kade has a bad temper. I want to see a REAL debate so I can get educated. I would like a "reset" button. Define the terms of what this and that means and start the debate. One sided arguements are boring.

 

[krazy kaju]

So are you finally going to give in and debate are you going to continue being a bitch, Kade?

 

[Kade]

Kade, seriously. READ THE DAMN THREAD.

But since I don't want your idiocy filling another two pages with "define monopoly," I'll spare you the supposedly intellectually challenging process of reading a few posts.

Technically speaking, a monopoly cannot exist unless it has 100% market share. But as I've stated time and time again, it is impossible for a company to have "monopoly control" (i.e. controlling prices) without 100% market share. This leaves us in the same exact place we've been 10 or so pages ago, so I guess I'll have to ask you the same exact question I've been asking you all along.

Can you provide one example of a single business, corporation, etc. being able to corner the market and unfairly dictating prices in a free market?

I cannot provide an example, given your constraint of what entails a monopoly of one ever have existing.

I also can't give you an example of a true free market economy either....

 

[krazy kaju]

So you can't show how a monopoly could exist in a free market?

Why did you post in this thread in the first place?

 

[rockandrollsouls]

If I have I have forgetten it. Link it for me if you could be so kind. You are fueling the fire too with your insults to Kade and manloving to Kaju.

I haven't made a claim about Kaju not Kade. I know they both are highly intellegent. They both need to calm down. I know Kade has a bad temper. I want to see a REAL debate so I can get educated. I would like a "reset" button. Define the terms of what this and that means and start the debate. One sided arguements are boring.

1. If you read from page one as opposed to the last page of the thread you'd see kaju is trying to have a real debate. 2. It's intelligent. 3. If you definite intelligence by insults and opinions without evidence to support them, then yes. Kade is intelligent.

 

[krazy kaju]

BTW, Kade, your signature is really cute. I didn't even know you're that immature.

 

[Kade]

So you can't show how a monopoly could exist in a free market?

Why did you post in this thread in the first place?

Because I believe your definition of a monopoly is insufficient. I believe that an enterprise can be monopolistic if it controls a sufficient amount of control over prices, goods, services, or information.