For $50k, can't the campaign fund this?
Well, I'd hurry and go ahead and make it so people can start donating given how little time we have. If we don't raise enough in time we can always use what we raise now for a New Years Eve ad.
I need to write a refund policy, if this doesnt fly they money will have to go to other
grassroot support efforts or New Years or other bombs Times Square projects, I will not be able to refund all hundreds of donors, so lets just hope we can raise these money by tomorrow night.
A poultry $50,000? $50,000 worth of chickens? You guys are funny.
More seriously, you want to blow $50,000 for an ad on Times Square, of which there are thousands, on a Sunday? Do you have any idea how many news reporters live in Times Square? zero (well basically). Times Square is for tourists, and that $50,000 would be much better spent donated to the campaign, getting people to the early primary states to canvas, basically anything. How about supporting this blimp with your $50K so that it can stay in New Hampshire until Jan. 8?
Neat idea but cost-prohibitive and not a good value. And you'll get no press out of this - where's the story? The bilmp is a story (an odd one). ANOTHER sign in Times Square is not a story anyone would cover.
I'd just simply say that if the $50,000 isn't reached in time that it will go towards a New Years or other Time Square ad project at a later date.
I do not think that this project would result in increased revenues in excess of the cost.
That is my subjective opinion so I will use my available funds elsewhere. If others disagree they should donate as they see fit. So I will post this once only and not be a naysayer.
The difficulty of projects like this is that it is difficult to measure your results. Without that, you don't know if it is a worthwhile proposition or not.
If this idea gains traction, I predict that there will be a lot of debate, but neither side will be able to marshall a compelling argument based on facts.