Time's 'Person of the Year' Biden and Harris were chosen

[AngryCanadian]

Biden and Harris were Biden and Harris were chosen as Time's Person of the Year
Time's had said Biden and Harris won the honour for "changing the American story, for showing that the forces of empathy are greater than the furies of division, for sharing a vision of healing in a grieving world."

To claim that Biden and Harris would bring a of healing in a grieving world is just pathetic knowing who sites at the Biden/Harris cabinet..

 

[Anti Globalist]

Only a complete and utter retard would think Biden and Harris are going to heal this nation. They'll do the opposite and line their own pockets instead while continuing to sell out America.

 

[Todd]

What a complete Joke.

I remember when I used to think that these big magazines had really thought long and hard about the world when they chose their big awards.

 

[FunkBuddha]

 

[Invisible Man]

What a strange and surprising decision. Is there something that happened this year that would make Biden and Harris especially important all of a sudden?

 

[Anti Federalist]

What a complete Joke.

I remember when I used to think that these big magazines had really thought long and hard about the world when they chose their big awards.

They did...there was a time when real journalism was a serious subject, and taken seriously, by serious men. You could certainly disagree with their pov, no doubt, but it was not the Punch and Judy show it is today.

The Marxist media organs of today have as much credibility as "Granma".

They are to be utterly scorned and laughed at, when even considered about anything at all.

 

[KEEF]

Very nice, only missing something in Kamel-toe’s mouth along with some man-juice spilling out. Sucking her way to the top!

 

[enhanced_deficit]

More indication that MSM has gone pro commie-libs-with-segregationist ties.
If media were just pro progressive-socialist values, POTY would have been Trump or Jarvanka or perhaps even Giuliani.

 

[Occam's Banana]

[Time said] Biden and Harris won the honour for "changing the American story, for showing that the forces of empathy are greater than the furies of division, for sharing a vision of healing in a grieving world."

What a complete Joke.

I remember when I used to think that these big magazines had really thought long and hard about the world when they chose their big awards.

They did...there was a time when real journalism was a serious subject, and taken seriously, by serious men. You could certainly disagree with their pov, no doubt, but it was not the Punch and Judy show it is today.

Even back in the day, the corporate press were gatekeepers for the establishment and the curators of "acceptable" public opinion.

But while they commonly employed shallow platitudes and frequently indulged sins of omission (among many other shenanigans), at least the more "respectable" among them did not often stoop to peddling such disgustingly saccharine homilies. They may have had perverse standards, but at least they had standards. (OTOH, maybe my nostalgia glasses are too rose-tinted ...)

No professional user of the English language who is in possession of the slightest shred of self-respect could unironically emit such cloying verbiage, and no reader of the English language who is in possession of the slightest shred of self-respect could encounter it without gagging. Yet this obsequious tripe is considered "journalism" by many.

SMGDMFH.