Time to go negative on Hunstman ?

[barth]

Here is how I see it: just like Santorum was pushed days before Iowa, Huntsman will recieve support just before the NH primary.
We didn't have the time to counter the Santorum surge, but perhaps we should prepare material to go against Huntsman, like a website or something, and be ready to run facebook ads if he begins to surge.
Your thoughts?

 

[Student Of Paulism]

Huntsman will be done in 5 days, his campaign is even more worse off than Frothy's is, when it comes to support and money, and i really dont think the media is going to bother with him, it's pointless. They already know Ron will place 2nd in NH, and most of us here know that as well. They didnt care if Ron got 2nd in IA, they just didn't want him taking first, and wanted to stop that by whatever means necessary. Frothy taking 2nd was just a bonus. I think its best Ron and the campaign team start putting out some more positive ads about FP/NDAA and Medicare/Social Issues, and spend the remaining time giving speeches at places in NH, rather than worrying about some candidate in the basement and who will be a non-factor soon.

 

[papajohn56]

No.

 

[asurfaholic]

Id say yes. If theres one thing I learned from Iowa, is you MUST vet ALL your opponents, because the media may pump any of them up at any time, and when it does, it may be too late to react. We need to show the voters that ALL the other candidates are frauds, and Ron Paul is the only choice. I wouldn't worry about punching down, especially after what happened to Frothy.

 

[fatjohn]

Yes, politico just ran something about a 200K ad buy that claims he is the only candidate that will end the war and rebuild america. Tie that in with the Ron Paul attacks his pack is doing. He has a much more fervent campaign than santorum thanks to daddy and the media will pump him absolutely. Attack him and romney in NH, attack Romney in SC.