Time-The Gentlemen from Kentucky: Inside the Partnership of Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell

supermario21

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
4,060
Getting some more coverage from Time, good stuff.

http://swampland.time.com/2013/03/2...-rand-paul-and-mitch-mcconnell/#ixzz2OeHnmNj9



Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell was watching a basketball game on TV at around 10 p.m. on March 6 when he flipped the channel to C-Span for an update from the Senate floor. At 11:47 that morning, McConnell’s Kentucky compatriot, Republican Senator Rand Paul, had launched an old-school filibuster to protest Barack Obama‘s nomination of counterterrorism official John Brennan as CIA chief. The soliloquy exploded across cable news and ricocheted around the echo chamber of Twitter. But 10 hours of holding forth had taken its toll, and now Paul was flagging. So McConnell slipped on a suit and headed back to the Capitol, where he took a turn spelling his junior colleague and praising Paul for “his tenacity and for his conviction.”

By the time Paul finally ceded the floor after midnight, he had become the Republican Party’s man of the moment. Libertarians lit up message boards with praise, heralding his principled stand. GOP message mavens marveled at his ability to wring every drop of publicity out of the event. Pundits began mentioning Paul’s name as a top-tier presidential candidate. Ten days later he won the presidential straw poll at the Conservative Political Action Conference. It took 13 hours of rhetoric on behalf of a doomed cause (Brennan was confirmed in a bipartisan vote hours later) to cement Paul’s transformation from Tea Party bomb-thrower to ascendant force within the party.

(MORE: Rand Paul Embraces Immigration Reform)

When he burst onto the political scene three years ago, few people expected Paul to become a savvy practitioner of the inside game. But since entering the Senate, he has soaked up the ways of Washington, learning to leverage Senate procedure and to channel ideas into influence. Behind the scenes, one of the key figures in his heady climb has been McConnell, the master tactician who tried to kill Paul’s political career before it began. Their improbable partnership has become one of the most important within the Republican Party, providing Paul the seasoning and connections he needs to broaden his coalition and offering McConnell political cover with conservatives vying to oust him in a 2014 primary.

The partnership got off to a bruising start. Back in 2010, the two men were on opposite sides of the GOP primary to replace outgoing Kentucky Senator Jim Bunning, whom McConnell had nudged into retirement. Paul was an unknown ophthalmologist from sleepy Bowling Green, lobbing bombs at his own party from under the Tea Party banner. His opponent was Trey Grayson, Kentucky’s sitting secretary of state. McConnell, like nearly every other member of Kentucky’s Republican establishment, endorsed Grayson. But local cachet proved no match for a Tea Party movement that had rumbled to life and adopted Paul as a national leader. He won going away.

By then McConnell had realized his mistake. “Mitch recognized early on, probably before the vast majority of people in this town, that Rand Paul had tapped into something,” says one senior Paul adviser. On the heels of the nasty primary, McConnell corralled Paul, Grayson, and every elected member of the Kentucky delegation for a “unity rally” at the state capitol in Frankfort. He dispatched key aides to provide guidance and beef up Paul’s campaign infrastructure during the rocky period that followed Paul’s disastrous interview with talk-show host Rachel Maddow. The two camps patched up their frayed ties. Meanwhile, Paul and McConnell began nurturing a relationship that has since paid off for both men.

On the surface, the two are an improbable pair: the libertarian political neophyte and the canny cloakroom operator. Paul, 50, earned his seat by railing against the apostasies of Washington stalwarts like McConnell, 71. ”You’ve got one who obviously needs to keep the trains running on time, and the other whose identity in large part is to make sure the trains don’t run,” says a senior Republican Senate aide.

(WATCH: Mitch McConnell’s Campaign Office Made a ‘Harlem Shake’ Video)

But each offers the other important benefits. “I see two people who kind of need one another,” says Grayson, who is now the director of Harvard University’s Institute of Politics. For Paul, McConnell is a valuable sherpa, steeping him in the Senate’s peculiar rituals, helping him navigate a fractious caucus and teaching him to make his stands without alienating colleagues. With the chamber controlled by Democrats, Republicans are allowed a limited number of amendments on legislation. McConnell grants Paul his fair share or more, which in turn leads to earned media and exposure and the chance to score political points. For a political rookie with presidential ambitions, Paul’s ability to win McConnell’s imprimatur is a crucial step to convincing the GOP establishment that he is more than a wild-eyed radical. “Having the Republican leader, who openly fought you in your primary bid, now showing he can work with you is an important step,” says Grayson.

On the other side of the ledger, Paul’s support helps shore up McConnell’s credentials ahead of what could be a difficult re-election campaign in 2014. For all his swat in the Senate, McConnell is on shaky footing in his home state; one survey, taken in December by the liberal firm Public Policy Polling, put his approval rating at just 37%. His relationship with Kentucky Tea Party groups has been uneven. David Adams, the Kentucky strategist who managed Paul’s 2010 campaign, is working to recruit a conservative to challenge McConnell from the right in next year’s Senate primary, with attacks cribbed from Paul’s old playbook. “A lot of blood will pour out as we peel that scab off,” Adams says. Paul’s support for McConnell, and his willingness to explain to the Tea Party why McConnell’s leadership position requires him at times to stray from pure conservative doctrine, is a valuable asset to the five-term senator.

To Adams, the alliance between Paul and McConnell smacks of political opportunism. “Mitch’s approach to ingratiating himself toward Rand and the liberty movement goes beyond the usual amount of political brazenness,” he says. As for Paul, “he’s in a bit of a box in terms of the grassroots effort to throw Mitch out on his ear.”

Allies of both senators stress the mutual respect between the two men, and by all accounts their working relationship is thriving. McConnell is a “mentor” of sorts, says one senior Paul aide. The two sit together at caucus lunches. Their staffs swap multiple emails a day. Their wives are friends. They have worked together on issues ranging from industrial hemp to national right-to-work legislation to the fate of a gaseous diffusion plant in Paducah, Kentucky.

From a political perspective, it is also a classic symbiotic partnership in a town where all relationships are in some way transactional. “It’s a pragmatic relationship, and it’s also a personal relationship. The two are inseparable from each other,” says Jesse Benton, a strategist who worked for both Rand and Ron Paul before McConnell tapped him to manage his re-election campaign.

It was Benton who served as the conduit when Paul sought McConnell’s approval to launch his filibuster. About two weeks before taking the floor, he broached the subject with Benton — who is married to Paul’s niece — during dinner at Paul’s home in Bowling Green. Benton conveyed the idea. The two staffs stayed in communication, and McConnell gave the green light. His approval gave Paul “a lot of cover,” Benton says. “Rand made sure this wasn’t just coming out of left field, and that made it a lot easier for allies all over the Republican spectrum to ride in and support him.”

It was, in other words, the kind of savvy gambit few would have expected of a man whose father was famous for ignoring the inside game of politics. Suddenly Paul was no longer just a Tea Party sensation. The hashtag #standwithrand began trending on Twitter. Politico anointed him “one of the two most potent forces in GOP politics today.” As for McConnell, he capitalized on Paul’s newfound publicity in his own clever way. Within days, he was fundraising off his colleague’s filibuster, urging supporters to “stand with Rand and Mitch.”
 
God I cant wait for McConnell to lose in 2014. "Stand with Rand and Mitch"....how clueless are these guys? Best take away from this article.....at least these establishment f**ks know they cannot get re-elected without the liberty movement. That is serious progress.
 
God I cant wait for McConnell to lose in 2014. "Stand with Rand and Mitch"....how clueless are these guys? Best take away from this article.....at least these establishment f**ks know they cannot get re-elected without the liberty movement. That is serious progress.

We could certainly have a far better person in Kentucky. But McConnell should be the last person we go after. His influence helps us probably as much or more than a true liberty senator.

Sucks to say it, but it may be true.

Slutter McGee
 
Remember when Ron said we'd be the tent at his rally? This exemplifies that. McConnell is hitching on to Rand, not so much the other way around.
 
Didnt jesse benton go to work on mcConnells re-election?

Edit, hired for 2014.


I see the ship is turning around. I can support McConnell if he keeps signalling interest in the true conservatives. He may not be perfect, but he is a very very strong ally to have.

And Benton haters, id love to hear your take on this....
 
Last edited:
God I cant wait for McConnell to lose in 2014. "Stand with Rand and Mitch"....how clueless are these guys? Best take away from this article.....at least these establishment f**ks know they cannot get re-elected without the liberty movement. That is serious progress.

Then enemy of my enemy is my friend. You realize without McConnell, Rand wouldn't be the national GOP darling that he is? Did you read the freaking article?

My God. This is forum is supposed to be high brow.
 
Didnt jesse benton go to work on mcConnells re-election?

Edit, hired for 2014.


I see the ship is turning around. I can support McConnell if he keeps signalling interest in the true conservatives. He may not be perfect, but he is a very very strong ally to have.

And Benton haters, id love to hear your take on this....

My take is, that Rand is making headway where his Father couldn't (or wouldn't). And if McConnell, or any other entrenched establishment bloak wants to climb on the bandwagon, then all I have to say is: ALL ABOARD!
 
Then enemy of my enemy is my friend. You realize without McConnell, Rand wouldn't be the national GOP darling that he is? Did you read the freaking article?

My God. This is forum is supposed to be high brow.

Yea, I read the article. Is that the first political article you have ever read? Rand got elected in spite of McConnell. Rands popularity has NOTHING to do with Mitch McConnell. Mitch McConnell is the "enemy of our enemies" huh. Take a look at our national debt under his reign as a LEADING REPUBLICAN and tell me he is not OUR enemy. Where has he been on the spending? How about his foriegn policy.....can we really make any real cuts without dramatically changing that? The republican party need to rid themselves of everyone in the party who's political beliefs flap with the wind. Watch, its either McConnell goes......or rand will continue to drift to them by taking weaker positions. imho.
 
Last edited:
Yea, I read the article. Is that the first political article you have ever read? Rand got elected in spite of McConnell. Rands popularity has NOTHING to do with Mitch McConnell. Mitch McConnell is the "enemy of our enemies" huh. Take a look at our national debt under his reign as a LEADING REPUBLICAN and tell me he is not OUR enemy. Where has he been on the spending? How about his foriegn policy.....can we really make any real cuts without dramatically changing that? The republican party need to rid themselves of everyone in the party who's political beliefs flap with the wind. Watch, its either McConnell goes......or rand will continue to drift to them by taking weaker positions. imho.

You completely missed the point. Obviously yes Rand became Senator in spite of him, nobody argues that. But a lot of people become Senators, it's not a big deal. What happens AFTER is. Not every Senator becomes national center stage GOP media darling. Running for Senate and becoming a national figurehead are two vastly different things. I'm talking about the latter. The article is mainly talking about the latter.

With McConnell's help and his green light Rand Paul became a national GOP hero. It's not what you know, it's who you know. Ron Paul and Rand Paul's stories tell this all too clearly.
 
Last edited:
Yea, I read the article. Is that the first political article you have ever read? Rand got elected in spite of McConnell. Rands popularity has NOTHING to do with Mitch McConnell. Mitch McConnell is the "enemy of our enemies" huh. Take a look at our national debt under his reign as a LEADING REPUBLICAN and tell me he is not OUR enemy. Where has he been on the spending? How about his foriegn policy.....can we really make any real cuts without dramatically changing that? The republican party need to rid themselves of everyone in the party who's political beliefs flap with the wind. Watch, its either McConnell goes......or rand will continue to drift to them by taking weaker positions. imho.

How myopic. Still cynical and doubting Rand? Fine, but you should at least slow down and listen to what they are actually arguing.

No one disputes his shitty record. From a policy standpoint, you can't be much worse. What they are pointing out is that if Rand controls McConnel or has a large influence on him, he has access to the Keys to the Kingdom. I know it's hard for people who don't understand the inner workings of politics, but Rand's method is not his dad's.

Rand is thinking and always has been farther ahead. Controlling the fate of the Senate Majority Leader is a good place to be when you are President of the United States. McConnel wins in 2014 and owes it to Rand. A Rand 2016 would ensure a Republican majority in the Senate. Rand will control the Senate. I hope you understand the value of that.

Rand is playing chess. You are playing checkers.
 
Last edited:
How myopic. Still cynical and doubting Rand? Fine, but you should at least slow down and listen to what they are actually arguing.

No one disputes his shitty record. From a policy standpoint, you can't be much worse. What they are pointing out is that if Rand controls McConnel or has a large influence on him, he has access to the Keys to the Kingdom. I know it's hard for people who don't understand the inner workings of politics, but Rand's method is not his dad's.

Rand is thinking and always has been farther ahead. Controlling the fate of the Senate Majority Leader is a good place to be when you are President of the United States. McConnel wins in 2014 and owes it to Rand. A Rand 2016 would ensure a Republican majority in the Senate. Rand will control the Senate. I hope you understand the value of that.

Rand is playing chess. You are playing checkers.

LOL. Ok wow, yet it took his father to create the movement. What game is that ? Chesskers ?
 
Yea, I read the article. Is that the first political article you have ever read? Rand got elected in spite of McConnell. Rands popularity has NOTHING to do with Mitch McConnell. Mitch McConnell is the "enemy of our enemies" huh. Take a look at our national debt under his reign as a LEADING REPUBLICAN and tell me he is not OUR enemy. Where has he been on the spending? How about his foriegn policy.....can we really make any real cuts without dramatically changing that? The republican party need to rid themselves of everyone in the party who's political beliefs flap with the wind. Watch, its either McConnell goes......or rand will continue to drift to them by taking weaker positions. imho.

No but this hooker has special AIDS that will get rid of your crabs. So at least now you don't have crabs right?
 
We could certainly have a far better person in Kentucky. But McConnell should be the last person we go after. His influence helps us probably as much or more than a true liberty senator.

Sucks to say it, but it may be true.

Slutter McGee

McConnell's influence helps us? Sounds like you got suckered by the article's implications.

Here's the most of what came of the reality of that article: If McConnell did offer his support early on, it's no longer needed because his early support was basically just making sure that Rand could defeat the Democrat in the general election. After that point he was useful in a few ways getting Rand connected throughout the Senate. I guarantee you McConnell he made these propositions for his own survival and has diminishing returns to offer for the benefit of either Rand or the liberty movement in a 2014 or 2016 bid, whenever his Senate bid returns for reelection.

We do not need this guy for anything, don't be fooled. We would be better off with a new liberty candidate in the next election, as his progress may return 2 and then 4 the next time around. We can't make concessions because of perceived political connections that are no longer relevant.
 
LOL. Ok wow, yet it took his father to create the movement. What game is that ? Chesskers ?

Ron never even sat down at the table. This isn't two dimensional. I'm talking only about maneuvering in the political arena. What Ron did was something far more important, but it was not playing a game.
 
McConnell's influence helps us? Sounds like you got suckered by the article's implications.

Here's the most of what came of the reality of that article: If McConnell did offer his support early on, it's no longer needed because his early support was basically just making sure that Rand could defeat the Democrat in the general election. After that point he was useful in a few ways getting Rand connected throughout the Senate. I guarantee you McConnell he made these propositions for his own survival and has diminishing returns to offer for the benefit of either Rand or the liberty movement in a 2014 or 2016 bid, whenever his Senate bid returns for reelection.

We do not need this guy for anything, don't be fooled. We would be better off with a new liberty candidate in the next election, as his progress may return 2 and then 4 the next time around. We can't make concessions because of perceived political connections that are no longer relevant.

You know the Senate Minority/Majority Leader have special powers right? You know the Senate Majority Leader decides what bills to introduce? 2014 will be a Republican election and 2016 will have to be for Rand to win.

You rightly point out that McConnell offers no value to Rand with regard to election, but that's disregarding one important aspect of the plan to focus only on the part that we have experience with.
 
Back
Top