Time for YOU to file criminal charges against your Senators and Reps. PLEASE READ

[freelance]

Contact Bugliosi. He might need a few assistants before this thing is done.

 

[tropicangela]

This is excellent. Bump for the law.

 

[ronpaulforprez2008]

Here's what I found for California:

GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 18200

18200. A person shall not be knowingly employed by any state agency
or court who either directly or indirectly carries on, advocates,
teaches, justifies, aids, or abets a program of sabotage, force and
violence, sedition, or treason against the Government of the United
States or of this state.
Any person employed by any state agency or court shall be
immediately discharged from his employment when it becomes known to
his appointing power that he has, during the period of his
employment, committed any such act.
Money appropriated from the treasury shall not be expended to
compensate any person whose employment is forbidden by this section.

If the provisions of this section are in conflict with the
provisions of a memorandum of understanding reached pursuant to
Chapter 12 (commencing with Section 3560) of Division 4 of Title 1,
the memorandum of understanding shall be controlling without further
legislative action, except that if such provisions of a memorandum of
understanding require the expenditure of funds, the provisions shall
not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the
annual Budget Act.

Search on Treason came-up with more options than this, check here if you wanna see more.

 

[Sarge]

I say more power to you if it can get done. Here is what you are likely to face.

http://www.anthonykeyter.com/mccain.html

A chilling read on deleting the SC implications.

If it is going to be tried, you would want to make sure the allegations are within the statute of limitations.

Even if you luck out and get the right State Judge, you can see what happened at the SC.

M and O should be filed before they get elected if your going to try this.

Not trying to dampen the idea but, you need to be aware of this case.

 

[RonPaulCentral]

I say more power to you if it can get done. Here is what you are likely to face.

http://www.anthonykeyter.com/mccain.html

A chilling read on deleting the SC implications.

If it is going to be tried, you would want to make sure the allegations are within the statute of limitations.

Even if you luck out and get the right State Judge, you can see what happened at the SC.

M and O should be filed before they get elected if your going to try this.

Not trying to dampen the idea but, you need to be aware of this case.

I can not do anything about M or O as they are not in my State. I am talking with an attorney friend of mine this afternoon at the tavern as we watch a couple games. I ran it by him on the phone and he mentioned something called "Civil Criminal". Something along the lines that YOU as an individual can force the state to file charges instead of leaving it up to the State to do themselves.

If what I think is possible I see no reason there will not be 100's of thousands of charges filed by individuals soon.

I am interested in just O and M either. I think that once these dirt bags realize they are not above the law and that citizens in their area are willing to bring Treason charges against them, in mass at that, for their intentional violations in an effort to destroy the rule of law (our constitutional republic) they might start to weigh things a little differently.

A few of these bastards being sent to prison much wake up the entire chicken coup.

This is going to move forward. Since last night I have talked to 10 people or so about it and all but one said they would file the complaint as well. This is looking good.... people are fed up.

 

[IPSecure]

I wonder if the Terror-ism laws apply to these thugs?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....

 

[RonPaulCentral]

I wonder if the Terror-ism laws apply to these thugs?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....

LOL. Now wouldn't that take the prize....

 

[1000-points-of-fright]

How do these laws square with the 2A which is essentially a right to rebel and the DoI which states "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness"?

Kinda contradictory don'tcha think?

 

[DXDoug]

We should get ALLLLLL OUR MONEY BACK from these asshole politicianns

 

[IPSecure]

We should get ALLLLLL OUR MONEY BACK from these asshole politicianns

With Interest, compounded daily...

 

[BarryDonegan]

laws contradict themselves all the time. it is up to the general public to decide which version of the laws to recognize as a people.

 

[sratiug]

How do these laws square with the 2A which is essentially a right to rebel and the DoI which states "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness"?

Kinda contradictory don'tcha think?

No. Our representatives were elected to serve and uphold the constitution, not rebel against it. The people can rebel and abolish the government. The government can't rebel against the people and abolish them. They are trying to anyway, so they should be in jail or at least expelled from office.

 

[RockEnds]

The government can't rebel against the people and abolish them.

Good one. I like that.