Three things that make Donald Trump an honest President

dude58677

Member
Joined
May 29, 2007
Messages
5,078
1) He has never held any public office nor any military background. Only president-elect/president to do so.

2) Won't take a Presidents salary. JFK and Herbert Hoover did this. George Washington considered it.

3) Proposing term limits for Congressman. Ron Paul and Rand Paul proposed this.

So what's wrong with that?
 
Trump...honest

SYGwA97.gif
 
I don't want honesty. I want vengeance. D.C. is a cesspool and must be purified by any means necessary.
 
1) He has never held any public office nor any military background. Only president-elect/president to do so.

2) Won't take a Presidents salary. JFK and Herbert Hoover did this. George Washington considered it.

3) Proposing term limits for Congressman. Ron Paul and Rand Paul proposed this.

So what's wrong with that?

I don't see how any of the 3 makes him an honest president. In fact it's pretty easy to, by doing your own research, find him taking multiple stances on every issue from when the campaign started until now. I don't know what you want to call that, but here in reality, we sure the fuck don't call it honest.
 
I don't know why you guys are so mad at this Trump guy.

1.) He never had polio
2.) He won't bite kids
3.) He knows how to take a shower if you know what I mean.
 
Ron Paul is the rate exception to that rule but most with that background are lining their pockets while in office.

A Statesman doesn't guarantee a libertarian platform but it is guaranteed to be a sincere platform. Plus it opens up a much larger pool of libertarians to become President instead of only a few in Congress and the Senate. There could be a lot of Ron Paul's out there that we don't know about that never ran for office.
 
Last edited:
1) He has never held any public office nor any military background. Only president-elect/president to do so.

2) Won't take a Presidents salary. JFK and Herbert Hoover did this. George Washington considered it.

3) Proposing term limits for Congressman. Ron Paul and Rand Paul proposed this.

So what's wrong with that?


My take is that Trump is the alpha male that was ridiculed by those arrogant liberals and decided to Run for President. Like a smart man, like a great general, he plotted a strategy.
He saw Ron Paul being ignored by the media. He saw how Romney doesn't give a shit about Trump or Ron Paul. Trump saw that.
He trial a run in 2012 but because he is smart, he didn't see an opening. It was too soon. After 2012, he plotted some more and registered MAGA brand.
He polled the electorate and came up with immigration, security, obamacare.
He exposed the Media as corrupted shills.
He destroyed the Bushes.
He saw the Light.
He wants to drain the Swamp.
He triggered so many Liberals.
He is an alpha male who wants to write his name in the history books.

He is honest in his desire to do good. His ego requires it.
 
My take is that Trump is the alpha male that was ridiculed by those arrogant liberals and decided to Run for President. Like a smart man, like a great general, he plotted a strategy.
He saw Ron Paul being ignored by the media. He saw how Romney doesn't give a shit about Trump or Ron Paul. Trump saw that.
He trial a run in 2012 but because he is smart, he didn't see an opening. It was too soon. After 2012, he plotted some more and registered MAGA brand.
He polled the electorate and came up with immigration, security, obamacare.
He exposed the Media as corrupted shills.
He destroyed the Bushes.
He saw the Light.
He wants to drain the Swamp.
He triggered so many Liberals.
He is an alpha male who wants to write his name in the history books.

He is honest in his desire to do good. His ego requires it.

Does he taste salty?
 
My take is that Trump is the alpha male that was ridiculed by those arrogant liberals and decided to Run for President. Like a smart man, like a great general, he plotted a strategy.
He saw Ron Paul being ignored by the media. He saw how Romney doesn't give a $#@! about Trump or Ron Paul. Trump saw that.
He trial a run in 2012 but because he is smart, he didn't see an opening. It was too soon. After 2012, he plotted some more and registered MAGA brand.
He polled the electorate and came up with immigration, security, obamacare.
He exposed the Media as corrupted shills.
He destroyed the Bushes.
He saw the Light.
He wants to drain the Swamp.
He triggered so many Liberals.
He is an alpha male who wants to write his name in the history books.

He is honest in his desire to do good. His ego requires it.

he said that a vote for Ron Paul would be a wasted vote and that he would run third party if Ron Paul was the nominee because "he doesn't even think in terms of Iran."
 
My take is that Trump is the alpha male that was ridiculed by those arrogant liberals and decided to Run for President. Like a smart man, like a great general, he plotted a strategy.
He saw Ron Paul being ignored by the media. He saw how Romney doesn't give a $#@! about Trump or Ron Paul. Trump saw that.
He trial a run in 2012 but because he is smart, he didn't see an opening. It was too soon. After 2012, he plotted some more and registered MAGA brand.
He polled the electorate and came up with immigration, security, obamacare.
He exposed the Media as corrupted shills.
He destroyed the Bushes.
He saw the Light.
He wants to drain the Swamp.
He triggered so many Liberals.
He is an alpha male who wants to write his name in the history books.

He is honest in his desire to do good. His ego requires it.

I've been looking for a good stain remover. What would you suggest?
 
he said that a vote for Ron Paul would be a wasted vote and that he would run third party if Ron Paul was the nominee because "he doesn't even think in terms of Iran."

Trump was talking strategically, as in he honestly didn't think Ron could have won the election if he got the nomination. Thus given his unelectability (in Trump's opinion), and his "weak" position on Iran, would make voting for him a wasted vote. He was sizing him up as a viable national candidate, not dismissing him as a person. We can disagree with him on the merits, but the point is to keep all the facets of evaluating political candidates in mind, not just the positions.
 
None of the 3 things listed is about his honesty. All it shows is he may not be as corruptible as most other politicians.

Ok that is my point. He is NOT as corruptable. I never said that this is the ultimate goal but we are selling ourselves short by only looking for libertarians in public office. If non-politicians are going to start running for office don't we have a much larger pool to choose from?
 
Back
Top