Thousands of Iranians Tweet #IraniansDetestSoleimani And May Face Punishment From Regime

[dannno]

https://twitter.com/chawshin_83/sta...-they-love-trump-but-iraniansdetestsoleimani/

https://twitter.com/Z0RVAAN/status/...-they-love-trump-but-iraniansdetestsoleimani/

Common, everyday Iranians and their supporters jumped to Twitter on Monday with a hashtag telling the world that they “detest” assassinated Iranian terror General Qassem Soleimani. But they love Trump and the Americans.

The hashtag “#IraniansDetestSoleimani,” began trending on Monday afternoon as millions of Iranians began to cut through the media mourning and Democrat Party terror support to tell America that common Iranians despise the Mullahs and their troops of terror.

Thousands of tweets appeared on Monday revealing just what the average Iranian feels.

One Iranian Twitter user noted that if they protest against Soleimani in public, they will be arrested, tortured, and murdered

https://godfatherpolitics.com/irani...-they-love-trump-but-iraniansdetestsoleimani/

 

[dannno]

bump

 

[dannno]

The people in Iran are HAPPY, that this man, who was responsible for the slaughter of so many people is gone..

Like, where was your outrage last month when the regime slaughtered 1,600 kids for peaceful protests? Where's your outrage for the thousands of political prisoners in Iran right now?

Where is it, @pcosmar ???

From everything I heard, a lot of the domestic political violence was being spurred on by Soleimani.. You're trying to say this guy was some kind of hero?

 

[angelatc]

1. They're probably USA propaganda puppet accounts

2. Pretty sure we could get thousands of 'merikan socks to tweet #AmericansDetestTrump without too much effort.

3. Even if he was literally worse then Hitler, the president has no constitutional authority to assassinate anybody anywhere. This is a crime.

 

[pcosmar]

Where is it, @pcosmar ???

Damn you are easily misled.

Twitter users in Iran..? where Twitter does not exist,,, BANNED years ago.

Anyone in Iran using Twitter is Likely a Foreign Intelligence Operative..

Tweets from Iran ain't from Iran.

 

[dannno]

1. They're probably USA propaganda puppet accounts

2. Pretty sure we could get thousands of 'merikan socks to tweet #AmericansDetestTrump without too much effort.

3. Even if he was literally worse then Hitler, the president has no constitutional authority to assassinate anybody anywhere. This is a crime.

Damn you are easily misled.

Twitter users in Iran..? where Twitter does not exist,,, BANNED years ago.

Anyone in Iran using Twitter is Likely a Foreign Intelligence Operative..

Tweets from Iran ain't from Iran.

So you are REALLY denying that Soleimani was behind the torturing and killing of 1,600 Iranians who were protesting their government recently??

Please actually watch the damn video, this isn't rocket science..

The Iranians didn't like him. The Mullah's didn't like him!!! He had too much power. He was using their military as his own personal mercenary force. He was wasting the country's money on the military.

The only people who liked him.. the only people who are upset are the neocons who were complaining that Trump didn't inform them, because he took out their CIA operative, and the CIA run mainstream media..

Look, below is Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert saying that he believes Ayatollah was crying crocodile tears at the funeral, but was actually happy to see him go.. and that the attack by Iran was fake. We have another thread with pictures of the missiles that did NOT explode, did NOT contain warheads and looked plastic. Plus they missed their target. They were just fireworks to put on a show..

When they attacked Saudi Arabia they were pretty fucking accurate...and used real weapons.... HMMMMMMMMM...

I said as the attack was happening this was a WWF attack, and I am being proven CORRECT by the evidence, and YOU people are spouting off CIA talking points by defending him!!




Another one of my sources is now saying that Trump and the Mullah's had a backroom deal to take him out, and have a fake attack against the Iraqi base, and then come to the table and make a deal.

I predict in the coming months Iran agrees to a nuclear deal and we ultimately remove the sanctions.

 

[pcosmar]

Another one of my sources is now saying

Q$hit

 

[dannno]

Q$hit

Ok, so I have all this like, evidence, plus I have a source who is consistently accurate.. and all you have is some bullshit comeback.. Do you expect me to be convinced??? Why not address my evidence and countless other points?

Stop supporting terrorists who murder thousands of protesters in their own country!!

 

[pcosmar]

Ok, so I have all this like, evidence, plus I have a source who is consistently accurate.. and all you have is some bull$#@! comeback.. Do you expect me to be convinced??? Why not address my evidence and countless other points?

Stop supporting terrorists who murder thousands of protesters in their own country!!

Freakin' Un-Hinged.

 

[pcosmar]

Ok, so I have all this like, evidence,

You have Q$hit

and that ain't good shit

 

[angelatc]

So you are REALLY denying that Soleimani was behind the torturing and killing of 1,600 Iranians who were protesting their government recently??

For the love of God, nobody denied any such thing.

I predict in the coming months Iran agrees to a nuclear deal and we ultimately remove the sanctions.

If that happens, it will still not negate the chilling fact that Trump ordered an assassination with no constitutional authority to do so.

 

[angelatc]

Stop supporting terrorists who murder thousands of protesters in their own country!!

The War Against Terror. This is a neocon bullying technique. We didn't cave to it when Giuliani tried it against Ron Paul,and we certainly aren't going to cave to it against you.

 

[dannno]

For the love of God, nobody denied any such thing.

You said these were fake accounts, insinuating that Iranians couldn't possibly have any bad feelings toward the guy..

If John Bolton lead the operation that murdered 1,600 Americans who were protesting our country's foreign policy, including somebody you knew a loved, and some foreign leader took him out, would you cry?

 

[dannno]

The War Against Terror. This is a neocon bullying technique. We didn't cave to it when Giuliani tried it against Ron Paul,and we certainly aren't going to cave to it against you.

Uh, ya, you mean when we went over and bombed a bunch of innocent people and Iraqi soldiers, instead of the actual terrorists? Because we were funding the actual terrorists? Because the terrorists were CIA funded??

Sorry, that is not comparable to this situation, at all..

 

[dannno]

You have Q$hit

and that ain't good shit

I have Q and the facts on my side... All you have are CIA talking points about how some dude who murdered and tortured 1,600 Iranian protesters was some great hero!!

I said the attack against the Iraqi airbase was WWF while it was happening, and I said Trump wouldn't respond militarily.

First, Trump didn't respond militarily - then we find out, the attack was fake!!

And all you have are CIA talking points straight from CIA run fake news CNN..

 

[angelatc]

You said these were fake accounts, insinuating that Iranians couldn't possibly have any bad feelings toward the guy..

Nope. I said they could be fake accounts, and even if they weren't, we could easily get an AmericaDetestsTrump hashtag trending without too much effort.

If John Bolton lead the operation that murdered 1,600 Americans who were protesting our country's foreign policy, including somebody you knew a loved, and some foreign leader took him out, would you cry?

We both know how Scott Adams feels about using metaphors and analogies when trying to make a point, in that it isn't persuasive and signals a weak position.

i don't need a ''what if'' statement here. We have a fact. The fact remains that the president had no constitutional authority to order the assassination.

 

[AngryCanadian]

Uh, ya, you mean when we went over and bombed a bunch of innocent people and Iraqi soldiers, instead of the actual terrorists? Because we were funding the actual terrorists? Because the terrorists were CIA funded??

Sorry, that is not comparable to this situation, at all..

Good lord some of you supposed Trump supporters are getting unhinged to claim that Iranian general was CIA and they killed him as one is almost believable as Saddam having ties with AQ.

Trump strong defenders like Mark Dice and Prison Planet need to be careful by defending Trump on the Iranian assassination know Prison Planet they were agaisnt the Iraqi war!

 

[angelatc]

Uh, ya, you mean when we went over and bombed a bunch of innocent people and Iraqi soldiers, instead of the actual terrorists? Because we were funding the actual terrorists? Because the terrorists were CIA funded??

Sorry, that is not comparable to this situation, at all..

The point is that pointing at someone and screeching terrorist does not, in fact, make him a terrorist especially if we subscribe to Ron Paul's assertion that terrorism is the result of occupation . He even gave Giuliani a book on it.

Are you on the verge of telling us that the US troops need to liberate the Iranians from their evil overlords?

And just for the record, we are still bombing innocent people as well as Iraqi soldiers.

We have no business meddling in the affairs of the Middle East. None, zero, zip. And the president had no constitutional authority to order the assassination.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

There are probably millions of Israeli ( he helped Lebanon defeat Israel in the 2006 war that killed over 100 Israeli soldiers) and Saudis in same boat, if they all started tweeting, could become a twitterstorm.

 

[dannno]

The point is that pointing at someone and screeching terrorist does not, in fact, make him a terrorist especially if we subscribe to Ron Paul's assertion that terrorism is the result of occupation . He even gave Giuliani a book on it.

Are you on the verge of telling us that the US troops need to liberate the Iranians from their evil overlords?

And just for the record, we are still bombing innocent people as well as Iraqi soldiers.

We have no business meddling in the affairs of the Middle East. None, zero, zip. And the president had no constitutional authority to order the assassination.

We have an evil and corrupt CIA, and the CIA has an asset in another country who is murdering people in that country and other countries.

One could argue we have a moral responsibility to help Iran in that situation, because it is OUR CIA asset, we put him there.

One of my sources, who is consistently right about world events, claims that Trump had a backroom deal with the Mullah's to get rid of Soleimani, who was a CIA asset. Again, I don't see this as immoral or egregious. I see this as solving problems.