This just in, Sandy Hookers getting sued for Christmas.

[Zippyjuan]

Dr. James Fetzer, whose 35 articles on Sandy Hook for Veteran’s Today qualify him for the highest investigative journalism awards, and School Safety Consultant, Wolfgang Halbig, whose investigative expertise as a former Florida State Police officer, and loving attention as a former principal, makes this case’s particulars comprehensible to all, will be called as expert witnesses.

Veterans Today as their authorative source? The publisher of VT Gordon Duff himself says more than half of what they publish is made up http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com...on-duff-admits-to-veterans-today-disinfo.html . (I can find no investigative journalism awards Fetzer has won or even been nominated for). Veterans Today has never won any journalism awards.

.I have as good access to information as anyone, probably - anyone I know of - about 30% of what's on Veteran's Today is patently False. At least 40% of what I write is at least purposefully partially false

 

[ClydeCoulter]

Veterans Today as their authorative source? The publisher of VT Gordon Duff himself says more than half of what they publish is made up http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com...on-duff-admits-to-veterans-today-disinfo.html . (I can find no investigative journalism awards Fetzer has won or even been nominated for). Veterans Today has never won any journalism awards.

No as their source. He, Dr. Fetzer, wrote the articles for them.

 

[Zippyjuan]

He is cited as an "expert witness"- not source. You are right on that detail. But Veterans Today is notoriously unreliable. Even their editor has said so.

 

[PRB]

Is this originally from the Onion?

who writes better comedy, theOnion or Infowars? (or infowars wannabes like naturalnews, theeconomiccollapseblog, cracked)

 

[PRB]

He is cited as an "expert witness"- not source. You are right on that detail. But Veterans Today is notoriously unreliable. Even their editor has said so.

VeteransToday is everything BUT unreliable, unless you're a paid shill by the NWO to deny any conspiracy theories before even looking at the EVIDENCE. care to share where and when the editor has said so?

 

[devil21]

You mean to tell me there are people that still believe the official story of Sandy Hook? Jeez I thought everybody knew it was a drill and faked by the media by now.

Suing media won't get very far though since courts have already ruled that media outlets have no legal responsibility to report truth whatsoever.

 

[PRB]

You mean to tell me there are people that still believe the official story of Sandy Hook? Jeez I thought everybody knew it was a drill and faked by the media by now.

Suing media won't get very far though since courts have already ruled that media outlets have no legal responsibility to report truth whatsoever.

Yeah, free speech is a bitch, lying is not a crime. And yes, people outside the liberty movement general believe every official version story, only liberty minded people are smart enough to see through the smoke.

 

[Zippyjuan]

The New York Times, the Associated Press, the Hartford Courant, and the Newtown Bee are being sued for 10 billion used, punitive damages, in a separate Complaint.

Ten billion used what? Tampons? Newspapers?

 

[pcosmar]

Well this would be the second Lawsuit..

The other one is aimed at the rifle manufacturer..

Either one of them will require evidence.
It will be interesting to see if any is produced.

 

[devil21]

Yeah, free speech is a bitch, lying is not a crime. And yes, people outside the liberty movement general believe every official version story, only liberty minded people are smart enough to see through the smoke.

I am curious at what point do media lies cross that line into the proverbial "screaming FIRE in a crowded theater" scenario? When do the lies start becoming actionable because they cause others to act in a potentially dangerous manner? If a person can be prosecuted for inciting an adverse reaction, where is the line for the media? It could be argued that making people act, through fear, as if there's a mass shooter on every corner waiting to kill them or their loved ones is approaching that line. I have no doubt that the agenda is heading that direction.

 

[donnay]

Well this would be the second Lawsuit..

The other one is aimed at the rifle manufacturer..

Either one of them will require evidence.
It will be interesting to see if any is produced.

What do you want to bet they'll settle out of court?

 

[AngryCanadian]

Since They are getting sued that means they are scared of them spreading the truth. Why would you otherwise would sue them? they have every right to say what they want about the event.


As much as 9/11 truthers.

 

[Zippyjuan]

The suit is being filed to simply draw attention. It is silly- especially the $1 trillion part. It won't be settled- it will be dismissed.

 

[donnay]

The suit is being filed to simply draw attention. It is silly- especially the $1 trillion part. It won't be settled- it will be dismissed.

I was referring to the lawsuit against the gun manufacturer.

 

[PRB]

I am curious at what point do media lies cross that line into the proverbial "screaming FIRE in a crowded theater" scenario?

Keyword : "falsely".

My guess would be if it turned into something like a bank run or actual crime was advocated.

When do the lies start becoming actionable because they cause others to act in a potentially dangerous manner?

Whenever you can prove a connection and/or show that absence such a provocation, the act would not happen.

If a person can be prosecuted for inciting an adverse reaction, where is the line for the media?

The media is hardly above the law, so the standard is the same.

It could be argued that making people act, through fear, as if there's a mass shooter on every corner waiting to kill them or their loved ones is approaching that line. I have no doubt that the agenda is heading that direction.

It's not that simple, or else Alex Jones would be executed by now.

 

[Trimbeaux]

Well this would be the second Lawsuit..

The other one is aimed at the rifle manufacturer..

Either one of them will require evidence.
It will be interesting to see if any is produced.

What evidence, I have not seen one picture or security video of that shot up school which had cameras or a dead body at Sandy Hook Elementary.
In fact they destroyed the school as fast as possible so a good majority of what happened is now gone forever.
I certainly do not trust the main stream media (Do we even consider them reputable sources anymore) or the authorities which bungled this story from the beginning.
Heck for me Connecticut Chief state medical examiner H. Wayne Carver's press conference was so surreal and ridiculous I didn't believe anything he said.
The weapons changed a few times too, until they settled on that evil black rifle again.
(which Carver kept mentioning the long weapon unconvincingly over and over in his press conference)
That's all I needed, what ever happened there did not go down as the authorities or the press reported.
I am with you, what evidence will be shown at the Bushmaster suit certainly not the bungled mess the authorities put together?

 

[pcosmar]

What evidence, I have not seen one picture or security video of that shot up school which had cameras or a dead body at Sandy Hook Elementary.
In fact they destroyed the school as fast as possible so a good majority of what happened is now gone forever.
I certainly do not trust the main stream media (Do we even consider them reputable sources anymore) or the authorities which bungled this story from the beginning.
Heck for me Connecticut Chief state medical examiner H. Wayne Carver's press conference was so surreal and ridiculous I didn't believe anything he said.
The weapons changed a few times too, until they settled on that evil black rifle again.
(which Carver kept mentioning the long weapon unconvincingly over and over in his press conference)
That's all I needed, what ever happened there did not go down as the authorities or the press reported.
I am with you, what evidence will be shown at the Bushmaster suit certainly not the bungled mess the authorities put together?

No one has seen any evidence. and some of the media coverage was staged and questionable.

Any trial will only highlight this.

 

[Noob]

A lawsuit about 9 11 media cover-up was won in court.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...vader-refused-pay-BBC-covered-facts-9-11.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI5lEZaHCaI

 

[ghengis86]

A lawsuit about 9 11 media cover-up was won in court.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...vader-refused-pay-BBC-covered-facts-9-11.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hI5lEZaHCaI

You are required to purchasing a license to own a TV in the UK?!?? WTF

 

[Weston White]

Oh good, another raft of nuisance lawsuits to kludge up our already overburdened court system. I suppose they'll be thrown out fairly quickly, but even a summary dismissal takes up valuable court time.

...I'm sorry, I wasn't listening.