This is why libertarians are losers.

[Lord Xar]

max,

create a pac and lets get this ball rolling....

radio ads... get two scripts together attacking two frontrunners for the next two primaries..

select 3 or 4 persons to review your ad and lets do it. Take donations.

Lets put 10K into the next two states, or two states after the next one....

I believe that you might get alot of donations since the campaign will not run "TRUTH ADS", perhaps we shall.

Nothing but the truth. NO LYING. JUST THE TRUTH.

We can state facts, and hit two or three major points each... then tell them that the elite do not want you to hear about freedom.. ala Ron Paul.

 

[abers076]

HERE HERE

Totally agree the gloves need to come off, RIGHT NOW! I have never seen Galloway before, blew my mind. Take these bastards down, get in the trenches and FIGHT! No more mister nice guy from us, too much blood has been spilled and forgotten about for us to take this lying down, and it has been done in OUR COUNTRY'S NAME. NO MORE! LET'S DO THIS!!!!!!1

 

[rrcamp]

I agree 100%

I say... at this point... broadcasting a bunch of attack ads... I'm talking hardcore, kick in the nuts ads is our best shot

 

[rrcamp]

I think it's time for the grassroots to devise an anonymous swift-boat strategy. Integrity is not being a loser. I would imagine that Ron Paul has far more integrity than most of us. I am not above supporting a swift-boat movement against Huck, McCain and Obama, our three rivals.

What's more, ads discussing their records are not really unseemly anyway.

+1

 

[Nash]

George Galloway is the man! He won't take any crap from those hired whores on the embedded media. He can do a lot better than that, too!

" The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything."

Stalin

He's also a socialist.

That reporter was ridiculous though. Pretty cool interview.

Anyways yeah I don't know if attack ads are going to do us much good at this point. Although I am kinda fascinated that Buchanan managed to pull 15% above his polling averages in 96 and we couldn't manage even 1% higher. Disappointing.

If anything they should have studied the Buchanan campaign in great detail and repeated it. It's not like they didn't have the resources available both from a monetary perspective and by just asking Pat himself.

I think the bottom line is that people simply don't like the whole message. They like parts of it but all at once is hard to swallow. The reality is that while I agree with RP's views he's a radical and radical change is scary to a lot of people.