This is a Snowjob!!!

Electrostatic

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
672
Anyone else notice that Mitt Frickin "Is not Running Anymore" Romney is only trailing Paul by 156 votes???

This is NOT right. Anyone who went to the Wa state caucuses can confirm this.
 
Just goes to show how uneducated the average voter is. They don't even know who's still in the race.....just voting on name recognition....or voting for "that one guy cuz he looks presidential."
 
Just goes to show how uneducated the average voter is. They don't even know who's still in the race.....just voting on name recognition....or voting for "that one guy cuz he looks presidential."

I think voters know a lot about the candidates. Many are really familiar with how Ron Paul is an isolationist liberal who blames America for 9-11.
 
I feel sad for America to give the election to McCain because 36% of the vote could be going to candidates who won't run us into the ground. Oh well, I hope these people are stocking up on food and water because when the shit hits the fan they will be the ones starving in the street and blaming the government for their troubles. Too bad they will never realize it was them who created this government.
 
Give the Romney votes the benefit of the doubt - they may really hate McCain so much that they'd rather vote for someone that has dropped out. Romney's better states were in the west. It's plausible.
 
I took Romney's speech thursday to sound like if people want to keep voting for him and nominate him - he'll take it, he's just not gonna actively campaign anymore.
 
Give the Romney votes the benefit of the doubt - they may really hate McCain so much that they'd rather vote for someone that has dropped out. Romney's better states were in the west. It's plausible.


Intentionally voting for a no-longer-running Romney is equally as stupid as voting for a still-running Romney. They deserve no benefit, imho.
 
To be fair if the ballot ends up Clinton vs McCain...How many of us will be writing in Ron Paul? They could be just as diehard as we are we dont know why the voted for him.
 
I took Romney's speech thursday to sound like if people want to keep voting for him and nominate him - he'll take it, he's just not gonna actively campaign anymore.

I have a problem with Romney and that message. If you stand for something then stand for something. Don't play these well I don't like McCain ideas but I hate the Dems worse so I'm going to kind of bow out crap. Ron stands for something and is getting that out there. Huck stands for something and is getting that out there. These other guys are worthless, they have nothing to offer America because they don't have any principles.

I just cannot understand why the people can't see that? I'm probably more mad at the constant posts I read of people not voting for Paul because they think he can't win or voting for McCain because they think he can. Voters need to start standing on principles as well.

Sorry about the rant, just one of those nights.
 
To be fair if the ballot ends up Clinton vs McCain...How many of us will be writing in Ron Paul? They could be just as diehard as we are we dont know why the voted for him.

Again, Romney vote=stupid vote, under any circumstance.
 
WTF! 87% done on the Democrat's, still 16% for the morons, just like in every single fn state
 
Back
Top