They're back again…

Uhhhh - Dr. Paul said he didn't write nor read them - an article comes out with "sources" to discredit that - and you say it doesn't matter. It matters big-time.

Are ya drinking some Newt moon-juice?

People care about the newsletters - it's brought up in nearly every piece of media. It's an underhanded subliminal device used to create negative sentiment in the public's mind. When reported they're called "racist newsletters" - over and over, again - whenever they're mentioned now - the publics subconscious completes that sentence - Ron Paul's newsletters = racist in the minds of the public now.

It's conditioning propaganda at its best.

This matters. Period. End-of-story.

Seems like you and a couple of others sure do want it to matter.
 
they're not looking for answers. They just want to ask the question so that it is cemented in voters minds. So whenever they think of ron paul they think of the newsletters. This will go away after the caucus states though. They had to bring it out for the caucuses.

But asking the counter question shines the spotlight on their tactic, and associates it with false accusations.
 
Uhhhh - Dr. Paul said he didn't write nor read them - an article comes out with "sources" to discredit that - and you say it doesn't matter. It matters big-time.

Are ya drinking some Newt moon-juice?

People care about the newsletters - it's brought up in nearly every piece of media. It's an underhanded subliminal device used to create negative sentiment in the public's mind. When reported they're called "racist newsletters" - over and over, again - whenever they're mentioned now - the publics subconscious completes that sentence - Ron Paul's newsletters = racist in the minds of the public now.

It's conditioning propaganda at its best.

This matters. Period. End-of-story.

"People" don't care about this story. Liberals who have no intention of ever supporting a Republican care about this story.

Stop falling into this trap. The best way to handle these issues is to completely repudiate the offensive claims made and speak strongly against the material. Dragging through the slop and garbage accomplishes nothing.

How don't you realize that? Paul does. Why can't his supporters?
 
It's not about CARING it's about building a perception through conditioning. The substance doesn't matter - the tepetition of terms to create a reputation in the subconscious is the end goal.

So what are you going to do about it? Be mad and lose all the positive energy we've been building?
 
It's not about CARING it's about building a perception through conditioning. The substance doesn't matter - the tepetition of terms to create a reputation in the subconscious is the end goal.

Think of this as how you memorized your multiplication tables - repetition. It's the same device used for an evil purpose.

In 2008 the media made the immediate thing that comes to the public's mind when they thought of Obama to be CHANGE. They've crafted this to make the first thing that comes to mind when they think of Paul to be RACIST.


....and you think the best way to keep this out of the narrative and collective subconscious is to... make a bigger deal about it?

You're being silly.
 
So what are you going to do about it? Be mad and lose all the positive energy we've been building?

Nope - just been combatting it on Twitter. Breaking down the negative perceptions.

TO fight something you have to know what you're dealing with - we're dealing with conditioning. The battle we have is to undo it.
 
But no one cares about the NL's anymore. They just don't matter because the campaign handled them perfectly.

It's part of their propaganda that the 55+ year old electorate gets bombarded with and pitted against Ron. If you don't understand this you are totally oblivious to the reality.
 
Bwahahahaha man that corporate media propaganda machine sure knows it's stuff. Ron delivers in a debate, must knock him down a few notches with a bit of slander. :rolleyes:

I so told you this was going to happen, and you didn't listen. (and I will keep repeating this until I probably get banned)

Maybe if we ask them nicely they'll stop :rolleyes:
 
It's part of their propaganda that the 55+ year old electorate gets bombarded with and pitted against Ron.


And?

"They" do the same thing about Newt's past. "They" do the same thing about Romney's wealth. The media is a smear machine. Period. There's nothing that can be done about it.

All you can do is mitigate the effectiveness of attacks by downplaying them if there is no substance behind their claims. The campaign did the right thing.
 
I so told you this was going to happen, and you didn't listen. (and I will keep repeating this until I probably get banned)

Oh wise one!

No one but you had predicted they would bring up the newsletters again! We all naively thought the media would jump behind Ron, bury the past, and surge him to victory!! :rolleyes:
 
Nope - just been combatting it on Twitter. Breaking down the negative perceptions.

TO fight something you have to know what you're dealing with - we're dealing with conditioning. The battle we have is to undo it.

I'm a victim of 400 years of conditioning. The man has programmed my conditioning. Even my conditioning has been conditioned.
 
Oh wise one!

No one but you had predicted they would bring up the newsletters again! We all naively thought the media would jump behind Ron, bury the past, and surge him to victory!! :rolleyes:

They apparently want Ron to hold a major press conference in which he outs whoever wrote this stuff.

I'm sure that would go over well.
 
That seems to be his goal, in general.

Indeed, I've seen a number of posters lately, most of them newer members, suddenly posting morale-deflating comments non-stop. Is that the real psy-op going on, to finish off Paul?
 
Last edited:
Again - I just was posting this to bring light to what the media are trying to do - they're not reporting, they're building a subliminal mental connection between Dr. Paul and racist newsletters.

When we combat this make sure to never mention Dr. Paul and racism together - this furthers those mental connections. I'm not and admitting defeat - I'm suggesting we adapt to the tactics.

This is subliminal - the content doesn't matter - only the mental connections the words create.
 
Again - I just was posting this to bring light to what the media are trying to do - they're not reporting, they're building a subliminal mental connection between Dr. Paul and racist newsletters.

When we combat this make sure to never mention Dr. Paul and racism together - this furthers those mental connections. I'm not and admitting defeat - I'm suggesting we adapt to the tactics.

This is subliminal - the content doesn't matter - only the mental connections the words create.

We know. We know how narratives work. Don't you think Paul does?

Again, you aren't saying anything groundbreaking. You're just completely off base when it comes to handling the issue.
 
youmadq.jpg
 
They apparently want Ron to hold a major press conference in which he outs whoever wrote this stuff.

I'm sure that would go over well.

That would make the newsletters a current issue, and give the MSM new mileage to cover it as such, thus falling into their trap. Paul should just continue to dismiss the matter as he has, or counter 'condition' by bringing up the disproportionate punishment of blacks in the drug war and justice system, as he has in debates.
 
Back
Top