They can't articulate why the foreign policy is "dangerous"

Just watching... Man, they are nuts. This is not Christianity, but some religion they have invented for themselves. :confused:

And I love Israel.

It is a CIA psychological warfare "religion", which works with military "counterinsurgency" experts to crush indigenous rights and "guerilla" groups. To crush freedom in the name of freedom (Patriot Act), and to starve people in the name of humanitarian relief.
 
The issue I have (being the crazy neo-con that I currently am) is that if Iran gets nuclear, all it takes is one crazy mullah to order it sent over to America, possibly killing millions. Paul doesn't care if they get a nuke and won't do anything to stop it. Therefore, Paul's position is dangerous. I tried to simplify this as much as possible.

Understandable, the thing is there are other countries with nuclear weapons where that could happen.

Pakistan has nuclear weapons and parts of their government are Taliban sympathizers. All it takes is the right radicals getting into power and they could give one away.

North Korea would sell a nuclear weapon, or the technology, if the price was right I'm sure.

Saudia Arabia is currently building several nuclear reactors. We don't say anything because they're on our good side. The thing is this is a country with Sharia Law and in case anybody forgot, all of the hijackers on 9/11 are from there as well as many of the suicide bomber we faced in Iraq. They're good now but what would happen if this country was like Egypt where we had our puppet installed but a popular overthrow put everything into the hands of radicals? They'd then have access to all the nuclear technology we allowed them to get. With the Arab Spring this past year, that's not entirely out of the picture.


Also, with Iran, we radicalized them. We overthrew their government in '53 that they elected. The Shah we installed was oppressive and the people didn't like it. The Ayatollah Khomeini was against the Shah and the people loved him for it. The thing was he was an Islamic radical but the people were willing to back him because he was against the Shah and they wanted him out. We don't get involved, they might not have a nut in power right now.

Another thing is Iran's population is young. A little over half of all of their population under 30. In case we forgot, these same people were protesting a couple of years ago at the election results of Ahmadinejad winning. Iran's younger population doesn't want to get nuked and are a little more "Westernized" in their views. I see a type of counter revolution happening there soon like what we saw here in the 1960's. The "old traditional conservatives" will clash with the "young hip liberals" in a way.
 
The issue I have (being the crazy neo-con that I currently am) is that if Iran gets nuclear, all it takes is one crazy mullah to order it sent over to America, possibly killing millions. Paul doesn't care if they get a nuke and won't do anything to stop it. Therefore, Paul's position is dangerous. I tried to simplify this as much as possible.

Think Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). In any case the war with Iran started a good while ago.

We have already attacked them many times over this past year.

M.A.D. is what supposedly kept the peace throughout the "Cold War". Although I have other ideas about that personally.

Lets face it. The fact that these weapons exist in as many countries as they do and in the quantities they have them is more than enough proof that CRAZY people are running all these countries.

Ask yourself if we are more, or less likely to go to war with North Korea now that they have a bomb?

Ask yourself why we are doing everything possible to be friends with Pakistan which is a country that evidently hates us far more than Iran at this point. Bachman and Santorum admitted in the debate we had to be friends with Pakistan because they have the bomb.

My thinking is that if Iran does get the bomb it would have the effect of normalizing relations eventually. The Globalist agenda would have to accomadate Islamic culture rather than irradicate it which is what they want to do. So to justify it they accuse Islam of trying to create a global Caliphate. That is such hogwash.

Iran has resources and the Bilderbergers and their Transnational Corporations want access to it on their terms. Therefore they prefer to keep Iran defensless. It really is that simple. The icing on the cake is that part of the agenda is to destroy religion including Christianity and replace it with Gaia worship eventually. That is at least part of the reason China and Russia will stand down as they are full partners in creating this centralised global technocracy.

The Centerpeace of Mercantalism/Globalisation has always been to pit your enemies against each other and let them destroy each other.

In this case it is engineering the clash of civilizations. Islam vs. Christianity. To have them destroy each other when the reality is in times of peaceful coexistence both religions are very similar in far more ways than they are different.

Its very difficult to get populations to go along with forced abortions when religion teaches against it. Gaia worship would call for it to save Mother Earth. (Translation: Keep down the slave population and get rid of the useless feeders.)

 
Last edited:
The issue I have (being the crazy neo-con that I currently am) is that if Iran gets nuclear, all it takes is one crazy mullah to order it sent over to America, possibly killing millions. Paul doesn't care if they get a nuke and won't do anything to stop it. Therefore, Paul's position is dangerous. I tried to simplify this as much as possible.

And then what happens to Iran? They are not that stupid... But if the USA threatens or attacks them and they are cornered, some "crazy mullah" could be motivated to do exactly that. It is not "stopping" them, quite the opposite.
 
It's DANGEROUS 'cuz we're SCARED, man! We're scared of everything, man. Look, I just p!ssed myself...again! Please don't let the scary men in the caves get us. We'll do whatever you want. We'll be your b!+¢hes forever. Rights? Who cares about rights? Not us! No, sir. Just keep us safe, please, daddy? We wuv you.
 
Last edited:
It's DANGEROUS 'cuz we're SCARED, man! We're scared of everything, man. Look, I just p!ssed myself...again! Please don't let the scary men in the caves get us. We'll do whatever you want. We'll be your b!+¢hes forever. Rights? Who cares about rights? Not us! No, sir. Just keep us safe, please, daddy? We wuv you.

The object of the media campaign is to make the people easily suggestible through the psychology of “learned helplessness.” The mixture of hyped patriotism, guilt, fear and helplessness makes Americans true sheeple, who can only trust their new Authoritarian Police State government to shepherd them to safety past all those scary Muslims and the dangers of Nuclear and Biological attack.

According to psychologist, Martin Seligman, the author of “Learned Optimism” (the alleged psychological antidote to learned helplessness), human minds can be trained to passively accept unpleasant situations such as the imposition of a Police state and the loss of their freedoms and liberties.

“...nullifying the natural reactions, which normally cause attempts to escape or to control the situation. It is a state of deep depression, brought on by prolonged immersion in a reality of learned helplessness...A person with learned helplessness easily gives in her/his goals if s/he fails few times in achieving them. Such persons show apathy, no motivation, depression and pessimism.

"The long range penetration strain.” The art of subjecting a very large group of people to continued long range penetration strain was developed by scientists working out of the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations and their U. S. subsidiaries, Stanford Research and Rand Corporation, and at least another 150 research institutions here in the U.S.

Dr. Kurt Lewin, the scientist who developed this fiendish warfare, has caused the average American patriot to fret over various conspiracy theories, leaving him or her with a feeling of uncertainty and insecurity, isolated and perhaps even afraid, as he searches, but fails to understand the decay and rot caused by “THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MANKIND,” unable to identify or combat the social, moral, economic and political changes he deems undesirable and does not want, yet which increase in intensity on every hand.

Dr. Lewin’s name will not be found in any of our establishment history books which, in any event, are a record of events mostly from the side of the ruling class or the victors of wars. Therefore, it is with pride that I introduce his name to you. As mentioned before, Dr. Lewin organized the Harvard Psycho-logical Clinic and the Institute for Social Research under the auspices of the Tavistock Institute. The names do not give much indication of the purpose of the two organizations.

Kurt Lewin gave the Tavistock Institute, the Club of Rome and NATO unlimited power over America, to which no organization, entity or society is entitled. These institutions have used the usurped powers to destroy the will of the nation to resist the plans and intentions of the conspirators to rob us of the fruits of the American Revolution and steer us on a course leading directly to a New Dark Ages under a One World Government.
 
Back
Top