They are Pushing for a War With Iran.

Graham Meets Netanyahu Wants War With Iran..

This is who South Carolina a dangouers interventionist, war monger.
Of course he has meet with his boss.

U.S. Senator Graham basically told his boss "Netanyahu" war with Iran to happen.



U.S. Senator Graham tells Netanyahu that he wants "to push forward to make Iran's worst nightmare real. The Arabs and the Israelis move toward the light."

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1742949969940656295

 
"toward the light" of Lucifer.

Hardcore stuff there.

It's coming. It really is, and war with Russia and China also. US will go down in flames.
Biden will order all of it. He is president another 5 years. I believe this has already been settled.
Graham there also says "working with the Biden Administration" to make it happen.
 
Last edited:
So true.

This story is very Sun Tzu.

An Emperor lines up 100 ladies in 10 rows with 10 in each = 100. He then asks the ladies in front to make the others stand at attention. The ladies whom were picked gather and giggle but when they ask the others to come to attention nobody does. The emperor then orders the ladies in front to be executed.

He then asks the next ladies standing in front of each row to make the others come to attention, and then they all do.

And, misleading your enemy with false propaganda. Like making them believe you are disorganized and weak when you are strong. Or strong when you are weak…. ;)
 
U.S. & IRAN battle through proxies

Guess its a proxy war between USA & Iran.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-iran-battle-proxies-warily-124311756.html

Same can be said between U.S. & Russia no?

Yet, in Ukraine, nearly two years in, a similar, unspoken set of restraints has worked — somewhat to the amazement of even President Joe Biden’s closest aides. Early on, Biden directed the military to do anything it could to support Ukraine — as long as U.S. forces did not take on Russia’s directly, whether on land, in the air or on the Black Sea. He also mandated that Ukrainians not use U.S. weapons against targets inside Russian territory, although there remains a constant worry about what will happen if a Russian missile hits a neighboring NATO country.
 
[no-embed]On its face it is insulting and degrading for mainstream "news" in the US to report that 1,500 more American troops are going to the Middle East to fight "ISIS" or "Daesh", when in reality, they are going to fight the Iraqi PMC's and try to stop Turkey from attacking the Kurdish/American oil facilities.

America's program to overthrow Assad in Syria and have operational control over all Iraq never ended. It has been continuous since the Iraq War, through a total of 4 Presidential administrations, 2 of each party, and that includes Trump.

What they won't tell you is the real reason WHY the government has to say they are still fighting "ISIS", a group that never existed indigenously, but rather arose from American and Israeli (and sometimes Saudi) sponsorship, which was branded as the Syrian Democratic Forces or ISIS. That is why Russia's military support of Syria was necessary to keep Assad in power, otherwise, Assad would have been overthrown and Syria would be another Iraq.

The legal reason is the same that the US uses to commit executive-level acts of war without Congressional approval, such as the ongoing attacks in Yemen and all its operations in the Middle East, including Israel. - the 2001 Authorization for use of Military Force, enacted 7 days after September 11th 2001, is the actual bill that authorizes the President to order attacks without consulting Congress against "terrorism".

Therefore, any war can start without Congress. All the ruling administration has to do is LABEL a group as a "terrorist organization", and it's war. The AUMF has been used to authorize military operations in at least 10 different countries. (link: Anti-war and human rights groups have long pressured Congress to repeal both authorizations as a succession of presidents have used them to justify launching military operations in at least 10 countries without going to Congress first.

The same 2001 AUMF can and might be used to go to war against the Islamic Republic of Iran, which, I'm sure you've heard, is "the world's largest state-sponsor of terrorism" - a term invented by the neocons for the above purpose - war without direct Congressional approval. It should be noted that although there have been successful repeal and replace efforts in both houses,

This being said, multiple attempts to overturn the 2002 AUMF against Iraq bill have passed both Houses of Congress, but for either intentional or "concidental" reasons, these have never made it to a presiden't desk. The Democrat-controlled House passed one in 2021, and the Democrat-controlled Senate this past year in 2023, but the Democrats lost the House in 2022. The current GOP House bill in Committee has not been voted on yet - but it NOTABLY makes exception for war against Iran or "Iranian-backed" militias, which the Republicans insist on keeping a target of the "new" 2002 AUMF - so that a president does not need congress to go to war against the whole region, if it can be labelled as "Iran-backed".

The two different AUMF's should not be confused, and they overlap. Both 2001 and 2002 are currently in-force.
------------------------------------------------------------
The Islamic Resistance in Iraq has carried out a missile strike on the US military base in the Koniko oil field, eastern Deir Ezzor region of Syria
https://t.me/WW3INFO/32424

Turkish shelling and airstrikes have targeted dozens of infrastructure facilities in northeast Syria over the past days, wounding at least 10 people and cutting out electricity and water supplies in wide areas held by the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces in the war-torn country, Kurdish-led authorities in northeast Syria said Monday.

https://abcnews.go.com/Internationa...ructure-facilities-wound-10-cut-off-106379009

New Jersey soldiers prepare to join fight against ISIS in Iraq and Syria

https://news.yahoo.com/jersey-soldiers-prepare-join-fight-234100372.html

he U.S. media reported that some 1,500 soldiers will be deployed to Syria and Iraq to "fight against terrorist group Daesh." The move will likely anger Ankara, which complains of Washington's support for the terrorist group PKK, ostensibly to help their "fight against Daesh." A local branch of CBS reported that the New Jersey Army National Guard will dispatch its 1,500 members to two Middle Eastern countries in one of the largest military deployments in the region by the U.S. in more than a decade.

Troops will be part of Operation Inherent Resolve, a U.S. military campaign against Daesh from Iraq and Libya to Syria. Last year alone, the U.S. sent more than 3,000 soldiers to Syria and Iraq for the campaign. The website Axios reported that U.S. military presence in the region reached about 45,400 as of October 2023 and most are stationed in Kuwait.

https://www.dailysabah.com/politics...a-despite-turkish-outcry-for-pkk-support/news
 
To no one's surprise.
Graham, Tom Cotton, even Trump are calling Biden weak for not attacking starting a war with Iran.
Trump is no anti war.
 
Base that got hit was in Syria. Not Jordan

So every news media site that says otherwise is already lying

(All of them are lying)
 
The US must strike Iran, and take out its terrorist commanders

The British telegraph had become the new Hawkish news network it seems.

In the past two weeks there had being several articles raging from Ukraine is losing, we must still support Ukraine. To "WW3 is fast approaching"

Now you have their biggest war mongering trash pile of a article.

We will only have peace when America uses force to defend its interests.

Iran isn't yesterday Iraq..
Those who are so obsessed of wanting to attack and start war with Iran shows us one thing.

gen wesley clark was right of the seven countries in seven years.
Iran is in the way of this.



The US must strike Iran, and take out its terrorist commanders


General Wesley Clark "We're going to take-out 7 countries in 5 years."

 
"They" have been trying to get us to attack Iran for decades.

Looks like their time's up.

 
Last edited:
image.png


I see two options here:

(a) 3 US soldiers have actually been killed in Jordan. The timing of this event makes it obvious that this event is, at best, a LIHOP sacrifice of US military personnel by the DC overlords for political purposes.

(b) 3 US solders have not actually been killed in Jordan. This entire event is manufactured fake news to whip up public sentiment for WW3.

It could also be some complex combination of (a) and (b). Elementary logic dictates that the scenario which we are supposed to believe has happened -- that 3 US soldiers were going about their lawful duties for lawful purposes and were killed perchance by cowardly enemies in Jordan -- has almost certainly not happened. The planets can align. They do not align every single day of the week, every week of the year, and exactly whenever it happens to be useful to the DC overlords for them to align.

Whether it's (a) or (b), somebody (plural) in DC is playing the traitor. Warm up the gallows...
 
Oh wow, striking Iranian commanders? That's super neocon thinking.

Can you imagine someone doing that? Crazy.
 
The current escalation in the Middle East is happening because the Zionist attempt to ethnically cleanse Gaza, the West Bank and south Lebanon. The U.S active support for this aim has led to more U.S. wars in Yemen, Iraq and now in Syria. While the U.S. has claimed that it did not want an all out war in the Middle East it has done its best to further one.

The dystopian decision by the U.S. and its European vassals to deny all support for UNRWA as response for the International Court of Justice decision against Israel's genocide of Palestinians was a further escalation. That a dozen or less of the 30,000 UNRWA worker were probably involved in the October 7 events was known for weeks. To roll this out just after the ICJ dictum happened is a clear act of revenge against the whole UN system.
 
Looks like Biden tapered down the expectations.

He wants to avoid a wider war, supposedly.

The questionable nature of the Tower 22 incident is probably why.
 
RELATED:
Lindsey Graham: 'Hit Iran!'



Yesterday's attack on US troops in Syria/Jordan gave Sen. Lindsey Graham the opportunity to repeat his favorite chorus "Attack Iran!" While Republican hawks profess admiration for President Ronald Reagan, they suspiciously ignore one of his most important foreign policy decisions: to pull US troops from Lebanon where they were sitting ducks for attack. Also today: Texit for Texas?
 
Back
Top