Wow.... almost 700 posts.
Who freakin cares? Small issue. Local trial. The MSM is making this a big deal and we are all buying it. There are bigger fish to fry around here.
The judge lady is obnoxious.
I won't pretend to know the temperament or attitudes of most judges, but from the start of the trial, I noticed that she seemed a little... well, like she just didn't want to be there I guess. I can't explain it. Maybe she's just bored of the defense dragging things on for obnoxious amounts of time, or a little annoyed. But she should be better prepared to handle these situations.
I believe that is for the jury to decide.Haven't been following at all; is there a manslaughter charge in play?
Wow.... almost 700 posts.
Who freakin cares? Small issue. Local trial. The MSM is making this a big deal and we are all buying it. There are bigger fish to fry around here.
I believe that is for the jury to decide.
They have the option of convicting him of Second Degree murder, which in my opinion is not going to happen, or convicting him of a lesser charge. (voluntary manslaughter and the like) At this point I'm not even sure if that will happen. I haven't been following the case much but I wouldn't be surprised if they acquit him.
Based simply on the fact that TM came back out of his house and a lack of witnesses.
Is there evidence that Martin came back out of the house? I was looking for that but didn't find anything.
At 5:14 she says he said he was at the back of his fathers fiancés house.
Back of the house but not in and then back out.
Piss off!72 pages guys. 72. Stop.
Frankly I don't know. I was going by what Dr.3D posted. (Martin's path in red, Zimmerman's in yellow)Is there evidence that Martin came back out of the house? I was looking for that but didn't find anything.
The only thing I know is that he was missing from the time he went out to the store and his dad finally called in a missing person report.
Thanks for that clarification.Back of the house but not in and then back out.
From what I understand this is a map of his path.
![]()
We are going for 100!72 pages guys. 72. Stop.
That's pretty much what the defense is claiming and no one knows if it's true or not. Since it can't be disproved it's certainly enough "reasonable doubt" that he should be found not guilty, but we'll never know what actually happened.
Holy shit. Since when does the MSM publish pictures of dead victims?