The 'Yes' to Sex App

[Suzanimal]

How romantic but I can certainly understand why men would use it.

New mobile phone device films people giving consent to protect users from assault claims - but health workers condemn 'contracts' as 'evil'

By Caroline Graham and Hannah Flint
Daily Mail
July 20, 2015

‘No Doubts': The app uses an Apple iPhone’s video camera to make a 20-second recording of both partners agreeing to sex. The video is then saved in a cloud or server

They’re already used for everything from ordering your groceries to checking your bank balance and booking a table at a restaurant.

So it was only matter of time before a mobile phone app was launched that lets people say yes to sex.

The app is designed to make sure there’s no trouble between partners the morning after the night before, as they film themselves giving consent. But while some health workers have backed so-called ‘sex contracts’, rape victims and student union leaders have condemned them as ‘evil’ and ‘dangerous’.

The WeConsent app is available for £3.20 and is the creation of former Wall Street banker turned philosophy professor Michael Lissick. It uses an Apple iPhone’s video camera to make a 20-second recording of both partners agreeing to sex.

A breathy female British voice asks participants to state their name and to agree to sex. Once the video has been completed the voice says: ‘Consent confirmed. Have fun.’ The video is then saved in a ‘cloud’ or server.

Mr Lissick, 57, said: ‘The videos are twice encrypted and can only be accessed by law enforcement, by a written judge’s order or as part on an ongoing sexual investigation by a college.’

More than 100 people in the UK have already downloaded it.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/07/no_author/false-rape-app/

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Well hell, that's not what I expected at all.

 

[thoughtomator]

and you never seen a tech support line with such angry, impatient callers

 

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

So this is what it's come to. I hope you're happy, feminists.

 

[Suzanimal]

So this is what it's come to. I hope you're happy, feminists.

The feminists in the article didn't like it. They claimed it prevented women from withdrawing consent if they changed their mind.

 

[euphemia]

I don't need an app. Do you need an app Suzianimal?

 

[Suzanimal]

I don't need an app. Do you need an app Suzianimal?

Nope.

Thank goodness, getting laid wasn't this complicated when I was single.

 

[phill4paul]

Pretty soon sex will have to be performed in the presence of a licensed sex referee. If the female revokes her consent the referee will throw the yellow flag. Of course if the male wishes to contest the ref's call he may throw a red flag. However, the final say lies with the official referee.

 

[Suzanimal]

Pretty soon sex will have to be performed in the presence of a licensed sex referee. If the female revokes her consent the referee will throw the yellow flag. Of course if the male wishes to contest the ref's call he may through a red flag. However, the final say lies with the official referee.

That scenario reminds of the chaperones at HS dances giving ya a tap of the shoulder when ya got too frisky on the dance floor.

 

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

I feel bad for all those men who pick up women at bars just to hang out and then the women rape them

I think we should take this a step further, make the potential partner list any recent changes to their sexual health and sign a form for liability if you accidentally give them the herps

 

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

The feminists in the article didn't like it. They claimed it prevented women from withdrawing consent if they changed their mind.

The ability to withdraw consent should have a three year statute of limitations.

 

[Carlybee]

Pretty soon robots will replace women so y'all will be in the clear.

 

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

Pretty soon robots will replace women so y'all will be in the clear.

I can't wait

 

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

The feminists in the article didn't like it. They claimed it prevented women from withdrawing consent if they changed their mind.

Oops I didn't actually read the article. This is a real thing?

LOLOLOLOLOL

 

[Suzanimal]

Pretty soon robots will replace women so y'all will be in the clear.

I can't wait

You don't have to wait, there's Roxxxy - she even comes with "skank" mode.

 

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

You don't have to wait, there's Roxxxy - she even comes with "skank" mode.

Meh it says she has to have her limbs moved. I don't want a cripple robot girlfriend. How is she going to walk into the kitchen? It's pointless if I have to help her make the sandwich she is supposed to be making for me. Can make a robot that has a realistic vagina, but not a robot that can stack cold cuts? Pleeeease.

 

[Suzanimal]

Meh it says she has to have her limbs moved. I don't want a cripple robot girlfriend. How is she going to walk into the kitchen?

Sounds like you want a sex robot with "sammich" mode. That's gonna cost ya.

 

[Danke]

Pretty soon robots will replace women so y'all will be in the clear.

Will it have a mute button?

 

[JK/SEA]

i dunno why the song Back Door Man played in my head reading this thread...

meh...moving on.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Pretty soon sex will have to be performed in the presence of a licensed sex referee. If the female revokes her consent the referee will throw the yellow flag. Of course if the male wishes to contest the ref's call he may throw a red flag. However, the final say lies with the official referee.

Sex will be illegal in the future.