The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare

Bradley in DC

Member
Joined
May 18, 2007
Messages
12,279
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html?mod=djemEditorialPage

The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare
Eight things we can do to improve health care without adding to the deficit.

By JOHN MACKEY

"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out
of other people's money."

—Margaret Thatcher

With a projected $1.8 trillion deficit for 2009, several trillions more in deficits projected over the next decade, and with both Medicare and Social Security entitlement spending about to ratchet up several notches over the next 15 years as Baby Boomers become eligible for both, we are rapidly running out of other people's money. These deficits are simply not sustainable. They are either going to result in unprecedented new taxes and inflation, or they will bankrupt us.

While we clearly need health-care reform, the last thing our country needs is a massive new health-care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and move us much closer to a government takeover of our health-care system. Instead, we should be trying to achieve reforms by moving in the opposite direction—toward less government control and more individual empowerment. Here are eight reforms that would greatly lower the cost of health care for everyone:

• Remove the legal obstacles that slow the creation of high-deductible health insurance plans and health savings accounts (HSAs). The combination of high-deductible health insurance and HSAs is one solution that could solve many of our health-care problems. For example, Whole Foods Market pays 100% of the premiums for all our team members who work 30 hours or more per week (about 89% of all team members) for our high-deductible health-insurance plan. We also provide up to $1,800 per year in additional health-care dollars through deposits into employees' Personal Wellness Accounts to spend as they choose on their own health and wellness.

Money not spent in one year rolls over to the next and grows over time. Our team members therefore spend their own health-care dollars until the annual deductible is covered (about $2,500) and the insurance plan kicks in. This creates incentives to spend the first $2,500 more carefully. Our plan's costs are much lower than typical health insurance, while providing a very high degree of worker satisfaction.

• Equalize the tax laws so that employer-provided health insurance and individually owned health insurance have the same tax benefits. Now employer health insurance benefits are fully tax deductible, but individual health insurance is not. This is unfair.

• Repeal all state laws which prevent insurance companies from competing across state lines. We should all have the legal right to purchase health insurance from any insurance company in any state and we should be able use that insurance wherever we live. Health insurance should be portable.

• Repeal government mandates regarding what insurance companies must cover. These mandates have increased the cost of health insurance by billions of dollars. What is insured and what is not insured should be determined by individual customer preferences and not through special-interest lobbying.

• Enact tort reform to end the ruinous lawsuits that force doctors to pay insurance costs of hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. These costs are passed back to us through much higher prices for health care.

• Make costs transparent so that consumers understand what health-care treatments cost. How many people know the total cost of their last doctor's visit and how that total breaks down? What other goods or services do we buy without knowing how much they will cost us?

• Enact Medicare reform. We need to face up to the actuarial fact that Medicare is heading towards bankruptcy and enact reforms that create greater patient empowerment, choice and responsibility.

• Finally, revise tax forms to make it easier for individuals to make a voluntary, tax-deductible donation to help the millions of people who have no insurance and aren't covered by Medicare, Medicaid or the State Children's Health Insurance Program.

Many promoters of health-care reform believe that people have an intrinsic ethical right to health care—to equal access to doctors, medicines and hospitals. While all of us empathize with those who are sick, how can we say that all people have more of an intrinsic right to health care than they have to food or shelter?

Health care is a service that we all need, but just like food and shelter it is best provided through voluntary and mutually beneficial market exchanges. A careful reading of both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution will not reveal any intrinsic right to health care, food or shelter. That's because there isn't any. This "right" has never existed in America

Even in countries like Canada and the U.K., there is no intrinsic right to health care. Rather, citizens in these countries are told by government bureaucrats what health-care treatments they are eligible to receive and when they can receive them. All countries with socialized medicine ration health care by forcing their citizens to wait in lines to receive scarce treatments.

Although Canada has a population smaller than California, 830,000 Canadians are currently waiting to be admitted to a hospital or to get treatment, according to a report last month in Investor's Business Daily. In England, the waiting list is 1.8 million.

At Whole Foods we allow our team members to vote on what benefits they most want the company to fund. Our Canadian and British employees express their benefit preferences very clearly—they want supplemental health-care dollars that they can control and spend themselves without permission from their governments. Why would they want such additional health-care benefit dollars if they already have an "intrinsic right to health care"? The answer is clear—no such right truly exists in either Canada or the U.K.—or in any other country.

Rather than increase government spending and control, we need to address the root causes of poor health. This begins with the realization that every American adult is responsible for his or her own health.

Unfortunately many of our health-care problems are self-inflicted: two-thirds of Americans are now overweight and one-third are obese. Most of the diseases that kill us and account for about 70% of all health-care spending—heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes and obesity—are mostly preventable through proper diet, exercise, not smoking, minimal alcohol consumption and other healthy lifestyle choices.

Recent scientific and medical evidence shows that a diet consisting of foods that are plant-based, nutrient dense and low-fat will help prevent and often reverse most degenerative diseases that kill us and are expensive to treat. We should be able to live largely disease-free lives until we are well into our 90s and even past 100 years of age.

Health-care reform is very important. Whatever reforms are enacted it is essential that they be financially responsible, and that we have the freedom to choose doctors and the health-care services that best suit our own unique set of lifestyle choices. We are all responsible for our own lives and our own health. We should take that responsibility very seriously and use our freedom to make wise lifestyle choices that will protect our health. Doing so will enrich our lives and will help create a vibrant and sustainable American society.

Mr. Mackey is co-founder and CEO of Whole Foods Market Inc.
 
Last edited:
Beautiful! Health reform not ObamaCare. Wish there was a Wholefoods in my town.
I like the way they think outside the box by combining HSAs w/ high deductible insurance.
 
bump. Lets come up w/ some more reform ideas. The Socialists are always asking for alternatives so lets give them some that involve less government.

To Mr. Mackeys suggestions I would add: Personal tax deductions for doctors that provide indigent care. Less money for big government more incentive for doctors.
 
I think if we could tie dollar amounts to the Whole Foods plan and then compare them to what the average person is getting from their company. This would go a long way in opening eyes. It would also make a good flyer to distribute EVERYWHERE!
 
That's the standard combination and how mine works.

Sounds like a great alternative to the high cost insurance. These are the alternatives I am talking about in a forums right now. The Obamanots are of course countering w/ Bush this and that and if you conservatives were truly Christians then you would want to insure everyone. Then you get the Republican rhetoric and the discussion to actually make serious change goes nowhere. Well one day soon I think the members of both parties are going to wake up. More and more it seems to come to a rude awakening on the part of citizens and politicians.
 
Jim DeMint and Paul Ryan have both proposed allowing people to buy any type of insurance they want through their HSA, and giving employer tax parity to individual HSAs. Basically, if you wanted standard insurance in addition to your HSA coverage, you could take that money out of your HSA without facing tax penalties.

DeMint and Paul Ryan are both quite good on health care overall, in fact.

DeMint:
YouTube - DeMint Speaks on Health Care Freedom Plan

Ryan:
http://www.cato.org/events/healthcarereform/index.html
(Fast forward a bit into the first video)
 
I know why don't we kill the FDA and their money grubbing poisoned food and drug ways that might make the population much healthier....

Ban aspartame, fluoride, and mercury being added to foods,water and drugs oh yea and kill the FDA!!!
 
Perhaps Mackey could be instrumental in getting more conservatives/libertarians into the organic/local foods movement--that would be fantastic!

By the way, the "progressives" are up in arms about this and are attempting to organize a boycott of Whole Foods because of this.

I hope that those of you who can counter this boycott will do so. Spread the word!
 
I reported this article to [email protected], because the right doesn't actually have any plans.


Reporting to MSM would be much more affective.

You have to remember the Hacks in the Executive branch report to their corporate masters.

I say... well there's Anti Trust laws for all other industries except the BIG 3 TRIAD of Health: Corporate Hospitals, Medical Insurance Industry, & Big Pharmaceutical.

Why is that?

If health and living are so important and it is a very moral issue, then why isn't non-profit and anti-trust law apply?

Remember right now... there are 3300 Health Care Lobbyist inside the DC beltway. That's 6 lobbyists for every single politician in Congress. The biggest spender of the 3 on the politicians for health care is the Pharmaceuticals.
 
Bingo! But I have to wonder why. :(

To sell their own product. These are great ideas and I will support Whole Foods because of it. I switched to a diet high in rabbit food a few months ago and I have seen the difference even though I do indulge every so often. I really need to get up on the exercise more. That is my next step.
 
Perhaps Mackey could be instrumental in getting more conservatives/libertarians into the organic/local foods movement--that would be fantastic!

By the way, the "progressives" are up in arms about this and are attempting to organize a boycott of Whole Foods because of this.

I hope that those of you who can counter this boycott will do so. Spread the word!

This would backfire on them I'm sure. Even though the hard core lefties will do anything Obama says. A lot of yuppie Democrats are very health conscious and if they start attacking Whole Foods I feel they would loose support.
 
Perhaps Mackey could be instrumental in getting more conservatives/libertarians into the organic/local foods movement--that would be fantastic!

By the way, the "progressives" are up in arms about this and are attempting to organize a boycott of Whole Foods because of this.

I hope that those of you who can counter this boycott will do so. Spread the word!

As was posted in another thread:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=116527991450

On August 12, 2009, Whole Foods CEO John Mackey wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal entitled "The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare." The op-ed pointed out some of the perils of the healthcare legislation being pushed by the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats, and outlined many alternatives being proposed by free-market advocates. The WSJ op-ed can be read here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB2000...072865070.html

In reaction to Mackey's exercise of free speech and realistic observations, many progressives - a key clientele for the Whole Foods chain - are up in arms. This group is to show support for Mackey and Whole Foods and to show gratitude to John Mackey for risking his bottom line to tell people the truth about healthcare.

You can send a message to Whole Foods main office telling them you support the free market and free speech: http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/company/service.php
 
I am confused. If you kill the FDA, who would ban those things, exactly?

Well since the FDA approved them can we expect them to back track and call them poison? The people could demand a ban.

As long as we have an organization like the FDA in charge of our food supply how can we expect to be healthy?
 
Back
Top