The United Nations; UN to take over THE ALAMO

presence

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2011
Messages
19,330
Wait, What? The Alamo May Soon Fly The Blue United Nations Flag?


united_nations_flag_grunge_by_think0-d350lkk.jpg






I shit you not:




In other news, San Antonio has the opportunity for its five Spanish Colonial Missions to be nominated to be the first UNESCO World Heritage site in the State of Texas andthe 22nd World Heritage designationin the United States. Please click herefor more information on the nomination, and for more informationon U.S. involvement in UNESCO,click here. Keep reading for more information on these and other events this month has to offer.


Happy fall to all!



http://www.sanantonio.gov/historic/Docs/Newsletters/October_2013.pdf



Happy fall to all? Fuck you,
800px-Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg.png


the four remaining missions and the Alamo, the first of five missions built here, are being nominated by the Obama Administration for World Heritage Site status by the federal government, U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced Friday morning at Mission Concepción

[]

He predicted that official approval by UNESCO would come in 2015
http://therivardreport.com/san-anto...-one-of-the-most-special-places-in-the-world/


once again, 177 years after the historic battle for liberty, the Alamo is under siege.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/united-nations-to-take-over-the-alamo.html


flagindistress.jpg

The militia uses this symbol for a nation in distress.


United Nations To Destroy Property Rights of Thousands Around Alamo


Is the United Nations set to take over the Alamo?


Officials bash rumors that Alamo, other missions will be run by UN
 
Last edited:
UN recognizes the historic significance of sites around the world. Naming a site to the list does not mean the UN owns it. The UN flag does not fly over UNESCO sites.

Until the end of 2004, there were six criteria for cultural heritage and four criteria for natural heritage. In 2005, this was modified so that there is only one set of ten criteria. Nominated sites must be of "outstanding universal value" and meet at least one of the ten criteria.[8]

Cultural criteria

(i) "represents a masterpiece of human creative genius"
(ii) "exhibits an important interchange of human values, over a span of time, or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town-planning, or landscape design"
(iii) "bears a unique or exceptional testimony to a cultural tradition or to a civilization which is living or which has disappeared"
(iv) "is an outstanding example of a type of building, architectural, or technological ensemble or landscape which illustrates a significant stage in human history"
(v) "is an outstanding example of a traditional human settlement, land-use, or sea-use which is representative of a culture, or human interaction with the environment especially when it has become vulnerable under the impact of irreversible change"
(vi) "is directly or tangibly associated with events or living traditions, with ideas, or with beliefs, with artistic and literary works of outstanding universal significance"

Natural criteria
(vii) "contains superlative natural phenomena or areas of exceptional natural beauty and aesthetic importance"
(viii) "is an outstanding example representing major stages of Earth's history, including the record of life, significant on-going geological processes in the development of landforms, or significant geomorphic or physiographic features"
(ix) "is an outstanding example representing significant on-going ecological and biological processes in the evolution and development of terrestrial, fresh water, coastal and marine ecosystems, and communities of plants and animals"
(x) "contains the most important and significant natural habitats for in-situ conservation of biological diversity, including those containing threatened species of outstanding universal value from the point of view of science or conservation"

Legal status of designated sites

UNESCO designation as a World Heritage Site provides prima facie evidence that such culturally sensitive sites are legally protected pursuant to the Law of War, under the Geneva Convention, its Articles, Protocols and Customs, together with other treaties including the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and international law.

Thus, the Geneva Convention treaty promulgates:

"Article 53. PROTECTION OF CULTURAL OBJECTS AND OF PLACES OF WORSHIP. Without prejudice to the provisions of the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict of 14 May 1954,' and of other relevant international instruments, it is prohibited:[9]

(a) To commit any acts of hostility directed against the historic monuments, works of art or places of worship which constitute the cultural or spiritual heritage of peoples; (b) To use such objects in support of the military effort; (c) To make such objects the object of reprisals."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Heritage_Site
 
Last edited:
Back
Top