“The Truth About Vaccines”

I hope I’m not the only one to think this is interesting, but the inventor of vaccines, Edward Jenner, joined the masonic Royal Berkeley Lodge of Faith and Friendship on 30 December 1802.
Jenner even became “Worshipful Master” of this lodge in 1812 and 1813.
Edward Jenner attended his last lodge meeting on 4 July 1822, 6 months before his death.

Jenner was born in a family of freemasons. Edward’s nephew, Henry Jenner, was Master for the first 2 years of the Lodge and later Provincial Grand Master for Bristol. Edward’s son, Robert F. Jenner, was Master of the Lodge in 1827, 1828, 1847 and 1848. Another of Edward’s nephews, Rev. G.C. Jenner, was Lodge Secretary and Provincial Grand Chaplain for Bristol: http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/biography/jenner_e/jenner_e.html

Edward Jenner was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1789, for his research on the nesting habits of the cuckoo: http://www.freemasonrytoday.com/mor...ward-jenner-freemason-and-natural-philosopher
 
Firestarter said:
Ronald Reagan playing the role of US President for real, had the “National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act” passed, that effectively restricted compensation for the damage of vaccines.

I can never forgive him for that....
 
Doctor Blows the Whistle on Vaccines: If They’re So Healthy, Why Are They Forced On Us?

Suzanne Humphries, MD, is an accredited doctor who has been in the traditional medical system from 1989 to 2011—but now she’s come out to express her critical views on vaccines. (scroll down for full interview video).

According to Suzanne, the vaccine industry gives the general public an extremely biased and one-sided story.

After leaving the traditional medical system to start her own holistic practice, she felt implored to inform parents about the true dangers posed by such inoculations.

The medical world is constantly pushing for the general public to believe vaccines are not only safe, but necessary for good health.

Suzanne—who was a Nephrologist (kidney physician)—expressed how she “saw how often [conventional medicine] fails patients and creates new diseases” and how she left her profession to research “the many problems with mainstream medical theory.”

She continued, “Why must such a ‘wonderful product’ be forced on people? Inventors of vaccines have chosen a belief system whereby infants are all born with inadequate immune systems (and therefore need to be “saved” from diseases by vaccines).”
Collective Evolution reported:

“It’s a proven fact that vaccine manufacturers and health authorities have known about the dangers associated with vaccines for a very long time, but have chosen to withhold them from public knowledge in order to maintain ‘herd immunity’. This is scientific fraud and manipulation of scientific data that’s dished out to doctors worldwide.”

Vaccines are constantly promoted and pushed as something that is not only safe, but necessary for children, even when an increasing amount of evidence and professionals come out with contrary opinions.
Last month we reported how scientists from Oxford University bizarrely went ahead with an inoculation program in which hundreds of babies and young children in Africa were injected with tuberculosis (TB) vaccines—despite numerous failed tests on monkeys that caused them to “die rather rapidly”.

Yet even with the increase in evidence suggesting vaccines may not be safe, many people continue to blindly subjugate their children to the possible threat.

WATCH: Suzanne Humphries On Vaccines, here:


https://www.davidwolfe.com/doctor-blows-whistle-vaccines/?utm_referrer=https://zen.yandex.com
 
Massive Medical Cover-Up Revealed After Teen Dies From Controversial Vaccine

What greater case against vaccines do you need than the countless young women who are left incapacitated—and often dead—by the HPV inoculation?

Apparently, these lost lives aren’t enough to fully persuade the general public, even as another teen was left dead after taking the shot, this time passing away in her sleep.

19-year-old Jasmin Soriat was just one of many youngsters being instructed by their doctors and the medical establishment to take the HPV vaccine.

Placing her trust in the people who claim to make health their top priority, Jasmin accepted the inoculation…

Within a few weeks, the 19-year-old was found dead, passing away overnight in her sleep from respiratory failure.

But things start getting creepy when you learn about Dr. Johan Missliwetz, a forensic pathologist assigned by the court to perform a “second autopsy” on Jasmin’s body.

“I couldn’t find a reasonable cause of death but had two suspicions,” said Dr. Missliwetz, “One is a genetic disorder of the heart and the other one, it had to do with vaccination.”

But the medical mafia does not take kindly to “experts” in the field calling into question their highly-profitable products—and vaccines are no exception.

Upon reporting his findings to “drug regulation authorities”, Missliwetz says he began receiving numerous phone calls from “senior members of the medical establishment” attempting to “intervene” and prevent him from speaking publicly about his autopsy on Jasmin—specifically to avoid implicating the HPV vaccine in her death.



According to Collective-Evolution, Dr. Missliwetz has coincidentally taken an “early retirement” since the whole ordeal.

As the evidence—and the lives—continue to pile up in the case against the HPV vaccine Gardasil, some experts are already convinced that this shot is not only ineffective in treating cervical cancer but that it is, in certain cases, lethal.

“The full extent of the Gardasil scandal needs to be assessed,” says Dr. Bernard Dalbergue, a former physician working with Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, “everyone knew when this vaccine was released on the American market that it would prove to be worthless.”

Dr. Dalbergue adds:

“Diane Harper, a major opinion leader in the United States, was one of the first to blow the whistle, pointing out the fraud and scam of it all.

“I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all time because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine, technical and scientific feat that it may be, has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers.
“Gardasil is useless and costs a fortune! In addition, decision-makers at all levels are aware of it! Cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, paralysis of the lower limbs, vaccine-induced MS and vaccine-induced encephalitis can be found, whatever the vaccine.”

According to the Independent, countless cases of young girls debilitated or left dead by the HPV vaccine have surfaced.

In one of their articles, they describe the 131 women who revealed their own personal HPV inoculation horror stories, describing how their lives were “turned upside down.”

How many lives must be lost before a critical mass is reached to finally blow the lid of the Gardasil scandal?

Hopefully, not many more….

Sources:
Collective-Evolution
Independent

https://www.davidwolfe.com/medical-...-vaccine/?utm_referrer=https://zen.yandex.com
 
McBean - The poisoned needle

@Firestarter I appreciate you bringing in the history, but Angela is not interested in the history, she is only interested in the propaganda that vaccines saved us!

I have found another (historic) book on vaccines, published in 1957; Eleanor McBean - The Poisoned Needle (1957): http://www.whale.to/a/mcbean.html
The book shows that 60 years ago the anti-vaxxer movement mostly used the same arguments as in 2017. Big pharma has never provided evidence, but has simply claimed that every “anti-vaxxer” is an unscientific quack.
I agree with most of the book, but some of the conclusions go too far for me. In particular I disagree with “fasting” for a health treatment and the section on cancer…

Other than general believe, it isn’t the freemason Edward Jenner, who bought his “Doctor” title for a mere 15 pounds, that invented vaccines.
Dhanwantari, the earliest known Hindu physician, who lived about 1,500 BC, is reportedly the first to practice inoculation for smallpox. It has been claimed that the ancient Hindus even employed a vaccine, by the transmission of the smallpox virus through a cow.
Even if the Hindu medical malpractices aren’t considered to be vaccines, the farmer Benjamin Jesty (I hope for Angelatc - not a pig farmer...), years before Jenner’s first inoculation, discovered cow-pox inoculation. After Jesty, came teacher Plett, and another farmer Jensen, who were experimented with cow-pox vaccination – all 4 before Jenner…

I won’t do a full summary of the book, but will present the statistics for “evidence” that vaccines don’t work.

Chapter 1
The following diseases increased “in the past 70 years” (that’s from 1887-1957).
Insanity increased 400%
Cancer increased 308%
Anemia increased 300%
Epilepsy increased 397%

Bright’s Disease increased 65%
Heart Disease increased 179%
Diabetes increased 1800% (In spite of or because of insulin)
Polio increased 680%
Most of these diseases have continued to increase in the following (past) 70 years (from 1957-2017)...


Chapter 2
In 1902 when vaccination was endorsed by the majority, the death-rate from smallpox was 2,121. By 1910, vaccination disasters had caused it to lose favour to such an extent that the smallpox death-rate dropped to 202.
The pharmaceutical industry worked up a nationwide vaccination campaign that raised the smallpox death-rate to 358 (1919) and 642 (1921).
When the people noticed that the vaccinated were the ones who suffered most from smallpox and flu, they lost faith and by 1927 the deaths had dropped to 138 where it has been fluctuating since.

Although in 1929 the League of Nations reported India as the greatest centre of smallpox in the world, it has improved since gaining its freedom from Britain and relaxing its vaccination enforcement program.
Vacc-_Mc_Bean-poison-chapter_2.png


France had rejected immunisation after the previous disasters, but was pressured into submitting to it after German occupation. By 1941 most of the French children had been inoculated after which the diphtheria incidence rose to 13,795 by the end of that year. By 1943, diphtheria had increased to 46,750.


Chapter 4
From the report of Dr. William Farr, Compiler of Statistics of the Registrar-General, London:
Smallpox attained its maximum mortality after vaccination was introduced…..The mean annual (smallpox) mortality to 10,000 population from 1850 to 1869 was at the rate of (only) 2.04, whereas (after compulsory vaccination) in 1871 the death rate was 10.24 and in 1872 the death rate was 8.33, and this after the most laudable efforts to extend vaccination by legislative enactments.

Re-vaccination experiments published by the German Vaccination Commission in 1884, showed that smallpox vaccination was unsuccessful in about 2 out of 3 cases. I believe that McBean didn’t describe this experiment accurately…
The experiments were performed on 30 boys aged 8 to 14. Five of them had had smallpox within the previous two years; 4 of them had been vaccinated. The vaccinations were repeated every 8 days.
From the (first) 30 boys, 23 (77%) were unsuccessfully vaccinated.
From the remaining 23, 14 (61%) were unsuccessful.
From the remaining 14, 9 (64%?) were unsuccessful.
From the remaining 9 (?), 6 (67%) were unsuccessful.
From the remaining 6, 2 (33%) were unsuccessfully vaccinated.

Between 1886 and 1892, there were 25,474,370 vaccinations and re-vaccinations performed in Japan, which meant that about two-thirds of the entire Japanese population, already vaccinated by the law of 1872, were re-vaccinated. During that 7-year period (1886-1892) of thorough re-vaccination, there were reported 165,774 cases of smallpox with 28,979 deaths.

Chapter 10
In Australia, after several children died from smallpox vaccination, the government abolished compulsory vaccination and smallpox declined to the vanishing point. Australia had only 3 cases of smallpox in 15 years; compare this to Japan...


Chapter 5
In 1907, cancer was unheard of among children. But in 1957, a substantial amount of children dies from cancer.
The cancer death rate has more than doubled from 65 persons per 100,000 in 1900 to 134.8 persons per 100,000 in 1948.


Chapter 7
The common diseases mentioned by Morgan, more than doubled after the annual June vaccination campaign (measles more than tripled).
Vacc-_Mc_Bean-poison-chapter_4.png


For more information on polio (vaccines), see the following thread (including more on polio from the McBean book): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...lio-vaccines&p=6538870&viewfull=1#post6538870
 
Last edited:
Depopulation agenda in Mexico

I’ve found an interesting story about the depopulation agenda in Mexico, which involves vaccines.
In 1973, the Mexican birth rate was unashamedly described as a “Population Bomb” in the state media.
mexicopopulationbomb1973.jpg


In 1974, a group of Mexicans found out (or at least suspected) that a group disguised as inoculation teams “who looked like foreigners” gave shots at schools to sterilise their children. The teams were escorted by the police.
Vaccination was never done at Mexican schools, so the parents had a good reason to be suspicious.

The “rumours” began in the north in Nuevo Leon, and then reached Mexico City, where thousands of angry parents “in slum areas” stormed and barricaded schools, and removed their children from them. Some 35-40% of elementary kids were absent Wednesday of that week.
According to the National Action party: “The rare vaccine, until now never used, much less as part of a campaign which appears to cover many parts of the republic, is given to each child in three places: the umbilicis, the chest, and the spinal column”.
The government denied the “rumours”, claiming that sterilisation vaccines don’t exist.
CUTThe_Bakersfield_Californian_Thu__Dec_12__1974_.jpg


Coercive sterilisations under the banner of “family planning” were taking place all over the globe in 1974. In April 1974, it was reported that the government had sterilised some 1,204 girls and boys under the age of 21 at federally funded clinics across the country. This included a ten year old, an eleven year old, and ten 13 year olds.
The US government had funded sterilisations on: poor women, the mentally ill, deaf, blind, with Epilepsy, and others who were considered “unfit” to have babies.

Jurriaan Maessen noted, that Rockefeller had already conceived sterilisation vaccines way back in the 1930s:
Rockefeller Foundation minion Max Mason, who acted as president in the mid-1930s, on multiple occasions expressed his master’s desire for an “anti-hormone” that would reduce fertility worldwide. Now keep in mind, this is more than 35 years before the Foundation actually mentioned funding “anti-fertility vaccines” in subsequent annual reports from 1969 onward.
http://truthstreammedia.com/2015/05...exican-school-children-with-vaccines-in-1974/
(archived here: http://archive.is/zxQ34)

In 1972, the United Nations, World Health Organization (WHO) and World Bank collaborated on the “Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)” to “coordinate, promote, conduct, and evaluate research in human reproduction”.
In 1972, the WHO founded the “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation” to produce an hCG-laced anti-fertility vaccine.
This has continued to produce vaccines for “fertility regulation”, see the following report from 1991: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1874951
(archived here: http://archive.is/HG8pN)

In 1973, Stevens and Chrystle published a report on anti-fertility vaccines, which showed that hCG can be used to sterilise women.
Here’s the abstract of “Effects of Immunization with Hapten-Coupled HCG on the Human Menstrual Cycle” (1973): http://journals.lww.com/greenjourna...mmunization_with_Hapten_Coupled_HCG_on.1.aspx

In 1976 another study on hCG was published by A. Pala et al “Immunization with hapten-coupled hCG-β subunit and its effect on the menstrual cycle” (1976), only the abstract: http://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/0010-7824(76)90009-3/pdf


And then there’s the infamous 1974 National Security Council Document 20506: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. Written by none other than Nobel Prize winner for peace, Henry Kissinger...
They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia as problematic: http://schillerinstitute.org/strategic/NSSM200.htm
29. While specific goals in this area are difficult to state, our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two-child family on the average), by about the year 2000. This will require the present 2 percent growth rate to decline to 1.7 percent within a decade and to 1.1 percent by 2000.
(…)
In less developed countries growth rates average about 2.4 percent. For the People's Republic of China, with a massive, enforced birth control program, the growth rate is estimated at under 2 percent. India's is variously estimated from 2.2 percent, Brazil at 2.8 percent, Mexico at 3.4 percent, and Latin America at about 2.9 percent. African countries, with high birth as well as high death rates, average 2.6 percent; this growth rate will increase as death rates go down.
(…)
Steady increases in the number of acceptors at family planning facilities indicate a likelihood of some fertility reduction in Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, Colombia, and other countries which have family planning programs. On the other hand, there is little concrete evidence of significant fertility reduction in the populous countries of India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, etc.1
(...)
concentrating on the education and indoctrination of the rising generation of children regarding the desirability of smaller family size.
(…)
Considerable reduction in infant and child mortality is possible through improvement in nutrition, inoculations against diseases, and other public health measures if means can be devised for extending such services to neglected LDC populations on a low-cost basis. It often makes sense to combine such activities with family planning services in integrated delivery systems in order to maximize the use of scarce LDC financial and health manpowder (sic.) resources (See Section IV). In addition, providing selected health care for both mothers and their children can enhance the acceptability of family planning by showing concern for the whole condition of the mother and her children and not just for the single factor of fertility.
(…)
Research indicates that female wage employment outside the home is related to fertility reduction. Programs to increase the women's labor force participation must, however, take account of the overall demand for labor; this would be a particular problem in occupations where there is already widespread unemployment among males. But other occupations where women have a comparative advantage can be encouraged.
(…)
d. Sterilization of men and women has received wide-spread acceptance in several areas when a simple, quick, and safe procedure is readily available. Female sterilization has been improved by technical advances with laparoscopes, culdoscopes, and greatly simplifies abdominal surgical techniques. Further improvements by the use of tubal clips, trans-cervical approaches, and simpler techniques can be developed. For men several current techniques hold promise but require more refinement and evaluation. Approx. Increased Cost $6 million annually.
 
Wallace – Vaccination delusion

I’ve found another historic book that shows that vaccines are a fraud; Alfred Wallace – VACCINATION A DELUSION (1898): http://www.whale.to/vaccine/wallace/comp.html

My only problem with this book, are the graphs that are presented only at the end. It would be easier for the reader if the arguments were presented with the graphs...
The following is a summary of the most important evidence from the book.

There has never any proof that vaccinated people are more healthy than the unvaccinated.
All the evidence shows that, if the whole population of a country lived under healthy conditions - pure air, pure water, and wholesome food – all infectious disease would die out as completely as the plague and leprosy have died out.

Falsifying the numbers
Only 6 years after the announcement of small pox vaccination, in 1804, Dr. B. Moseley, reported many cases of properly vaccinated persons but contracted small pox anyway and even death resulting from vaccination.
In 1805, Dr. William Rowley and Dr. Squirrel published similar bad results of vaccination.
In 1809, Thomas Brown, wrote that many of his patients caught the disease 2 to 8 years after vaccination.
In 1810, William Tebb brought before the Commission a paper by Dr. Maclean, with 535 cases of small pox after vaccination, of which 97 were fatal.

In 1802, Dr. Lettsom estimated the small pox deaths of Great Britain and Ireland before vaccination at 36,000 annually; by taking 3,000 as the annual mortality in London and multiplying by 12.
In 1812, and again in 1818, it is stated that the average number of deaths by small pox in London was 2,000 annually. In the last 2 decades before vaccination, there were 1,751 and 1,786 on average.
But in the Reports for 1826 and 1834, to advertise vaccination, it is stated that the London death toll (before vaccination) by small pox “was annually about 4,000”.
In 1836 and 1838, they further increased the London annual death toll before vaccines by small pox to “exceeded 5,000”, while claiming that the “last year only 300 died of the distemper.”
In 1839, based on these falsified numbers, the conclusion was drawn "that 4,000 lives are saved every year in London since vaccination”.

In 1881, Dr. W. B. Carpenter claimed that:
a hundred years ago the small-pox mortality of London alone, with its then population of under a million, was often greater in a six months’ epidemic than that of the twenty millions of England & Wales now is in any whole Year.
The highest annual small pox mortality for London in the 18[SUP]th[/SUP] century was 3,992 (in 1772), while in 1871 it was 7,912 (almost double).
In 1871, the annual small pox mortality in England and Wales was 23,000 (5.8 times 3,992).

In 1880, Ernest Hart reported that in the years 1728—1757 and 1771—1780, the average annual small pox mortality of London was about 18,000 per million living.
The actual average mortality, was a little more than 2,000 . Even when the worst periods were chosen, with the lowest population estimates, the mortality per million was lower than 3,000.

From 1803 to 1851, among 31,705 well-vaccinated boys in the Asylum, there were 39 cases and 4 deaths – an average mortality rate of 126 per million. This was reported by Balfour and John Simon as: "most conclusive proofs of the value of vaccination".
Because there is no comparison with other unvaccinated boys of the same age and similar living conditions, this isn’t sound evidence.
In the period of optional vaccination (1847-1853) the death rate from small pox of children from 10-15 years (similar to the ages of the boys who are admitted into the asylum) was 94 per million.
I note that this comparison by Wallace isn’t proper either, as the time period isn’t the same (from 1803 to 1853 the small pox death rate declined)...


Graph 1 - small pox death rate London
The lower line shows the small pox death rate.
The middle line shows the zymotics death rate.
The upper line shows the death-rate from all causes.
The left part, from 1760 to 1836, is from the "Bills of Mortality" which is less complete as the right part, from 1838 to 1896.
diag1.jpg


From 1760 to 1820, amid great fluctuations and some epidemics, a steady decline is seen - a difference of about 2,000 per million living.
The decline from 1820 is much slower.
The right part starts with the great epidemic of 1838. Until 1885 the decline is very slow; while, if we average the epidemic of 1871 with the preceding 10 years, there is no decline at all.
From 1886 to 1896, there is a rather sudden decline to a very low death-rate.
Since 1854 vaccination was compulsory and almost universal; yet from 1854 to 1884 there is almost no decline of small pox perceptible, and the severest epidemic of the century occurred in 1871.
The clearly marked decline of small pox in the 10 years from 1886 to 1896 occurred, when there was a falling off in vaccination.

From 1838 to 1870, the zymotics death rate actually rose.
From 1871 to 1875, the zymotics death rate is lower.
In that last period the vaccination rate had diminished.

The decline of the total death-rate from 1760 to 1820 is relatively great, and it continues somewhat slower to 1830.
Then from 1830 to 1870 there is hardly a perceptible decline.
From 1871 to 1896 the death rate declines.
In that last period vaccination was greatly diminished.


Graph 4 - small pox, measles, scarlet fever (zymotics) death rate Ireland and Scotland
diag4.jpg


Ireland obviously had a much lower death rate than Scotland.
Since 1883, small pox death has been almost absent from Ireland, Scotland, and England. In the 20 years of repeated epidemics from 1864 to 1883, we find the average small pox death-rate of Scotland to be about 139, and of Ireland 85 per million.
Of the 2 countries, Scotland is better vaccinated against small pox, while the small pox mortality in Ireland is much lower.

But even Scotland had a much lower small pox mortality than England - in the years 1871-1873 (including the epidemic):
Ireland had a death rate of 800 per million.
Scotland had a death rate of 1,450 per million.
England had a death rate of 2,000 per million.
A possible explanation for this difference in mortality rate is that: in Ireland only 11 % of the population live in towns of more than 100,000 inhabitants; in Scotland 30%; and in England and Wales 54%.


Graph 5 - small pox and total death rate Sweden
d5.jpg


Vaccination was introduced in Sweden in 1801, probably first in the rural districts. Sweden was reported as a striking example of the value of vaccination.
Like in England, there was a great and sudden decrease of small pox mortality after 1801; by 1812 the whole reduction of mortality had already been completed.
Since 1823, for more than 50 years, there were epidemics every decade (with the exception of the 1840s).
In Stockholm the first vaccinations were at the end of 1810. The earlier Stockholm epidemics in 1807, before vaccination, and in 1825, were less severe than the 6 later ones, when vaccination was more common.
The 1874 epidemic of Stockholm had a much higher death rate, of more than 50%, than in Britain.
The medical establishment explained the enormous small pox mortality in Stockholm as the result of deficient vaccination; but the Swedish Board of Health states that "the low figures for Stockholm depend more on the cases of vaccination not having been reported than on their not having been effected".


Graph 9 - small pox and total death rate Leicester
d9.jpg


Starting in 1872, after the great epidemic, Leicester vaccinated their children less and less. By 1888 almost no children were vaccinated.
There is a clear to see, strong decline in death rate since refusing vaccines.

Following are tables that compare not-vaccinated Leicester with well-vaccinated populations.
In the “great epidemic” of 1871, both Leicester and Birmingham were well-vaccinated, and both suffered severely by the epidemic.
Vacc-_Wallace-tables.png

The last column should have read “Navy”...
 
Last edited:
Zippyjuan said:
Vaccines (and science) have changed a lot since the 1880's.

But the science is now settled today, correct?
Before I started criticising vaccines, I really did try to find "scientific" evidence for the value of vaccines.

According to the medical industry, we are to believe all of their claims - because they only act in our best interests.
When people openly doubt big pharma's products, the least of the attacks against them is calling them pseudoscientific quacks.

I've not only been called an "anti-vaxxer" and a "bad" scientist, I've even been accused of being a Nazi; for demanding evidence on the value of vaccines, and saying that the only acceptable scientific evidence is a proper placebo-controlled trial.
 
Before I started criticising vaccines, I really did try to find "scientific" evidence for the value of vaccines.

According to the medical industry, we are to believe all of their claims - because they only act in our best interests.
When people openly doubt big pharma's products, the least of the attacks against them is calling them pseudoscientific quacks.

I've not only been called an "anti-vaxxer" and a "bad" scientist, I've even been accused of being a Nazi; for demanding evidence on the value of vaccines, and saying that the only acceptable scientific evidence is a proper placebo-controlled trial.

Just like everything around us today, that is political, the accusers are the very ones who accuse others of things they are doing with impunity.

It's like a real life version of the movie, "Invasion of the Body Snatchers."

serveimage
 
Interesting......

Hawking: a victim of a vaccine-related virus?

And it may have been a virus that confined Hawking to a wheelchair rather than that motor neuron disease (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or ALS, aka Lou Gehrig’s disease) that befell him, beginning at age 21. He lived too long (76 years) for him to have ALS, which has a 2-year survival rate.

Stephen Hawking may have been misdiagnosed and was actually a victim of polio, a US medical expert has suggested.

Christopher B Cooper, Professor Emeritus of Medicine and Physiology at the University of California, Los Angeles, says the likelihood the physicist’s debilitating condition was in fact amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) was “low.” Hawking’s young age at diagnosis and 55-year survival is not typical of ALS.

There is speculation that Hawking may have developed his nerve paralysis as a side effect from a genetically engineered virus which “possesses significant unpredictability and a number of inherent harmful potential hazards,” says a published report.

He may actually have been a victim of vaccines.

Non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) is a condition that became a widespread problem in India following mass vaccination against polio. The Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (IJME) explains that NPAFP is indistinguishable from polio paralysis.

Vaccine-induced polio is now the predominant form of polio in the world now. For example, approximately eight people acquire poliomyelitis in the U.S annually and virtually all of these cases are vaccine-related. As early as 1936 vaccine-induced polio was reported.

Vaccine-related polio is said to emanate from “rare strains of poliovirus that have genetically mutated from the strain contained in the oral polio vaccine.” It is possible Hawking discovered this himself, but only after he had become a poster boy for ALS.

An even more hidden trigger of polio may be vaccination of any kind. In 1948 as documented in the Archives of Pediatrics, susceptibility to polio was associated with immunization for typhoid-paratyphoid vaccine. In 1952 it was reported polio was associated with any form of injected medicine.

A study published in 1952 found a relationship between inoculation for tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough) and diphtheria with the development of paralytic poliomyelitis.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/04...-may-have-been-a-polio-victim-from-a-vaccine/
 
For more on the (censored) William Thompson study that shows that vaccines cause autism in Afro-American boys and the retracted report on the (real) findings: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...lio-vaccines&p=6543416&viewfull=1#post6543416

In August 2014, CDC senior vaccine safety scientist, William Thompson, blew the whistle on a study, which showed that black boys got autistic because of the MMR vaccine, a 250% increase in autism diagnoses for black boys.
A high CDC official, Frank DeStefano, ordered Thompson and his team to destroy that data in a large garbage can and omit the damning findings from the published study. That (censored) study forms the cornerstone of the CDC's orthodoxy that vaccines don't cause autism

Staff level scientists,
are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right," and that, "Senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors.
(…)
questionable and unethical practices, occurring at all levels and in all of our respective units, threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.
https://www.ecowatch.com/cdc-corruption-robert-kennedy-jr-2096438139.html
(archived here: http://archive.li/Ksydy)

Brian S. Hooker wrote the report of the (real) findings after getting raw data on the study. This report for some reason was retracted (but is still on the internet)…
4) Brian S. Hooker – Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young African american boys: a reanalysis of CDC data (2014): https://translationalneurodegeneration.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2047-9158-3-16
(archived here: http://archive.fo/Z7F4B)
When comparing cases and controls receiving their first MMR vaccine before and after 36 months of age, there was a statistically significant increase in autism cases specifically among African American males who received the first MMR prior to 36 months of age.
(…)
The relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism was first hypothesized by Wakefield et al. [7] in 1999 after the observation of a regressive phenotype of autism that appeared in general after the administration of the first MMR vaccine. Although several studies have affirmed such a relationship between the MMR vaccine and neurodevelopmental disorders including autism [8, 9], many other studies purport no statistical relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism incidence.
(…)
Within this study, the age at the first MMR vaccine was assessed as a factor in the incidence of autism. Using conditional logistic regression, with first MMR age as the independent variable and autism incidence as the dependent variable, the study authors assessed relative risk for obtaining an autism diagnosis for those children receiving the first MMR vaccine before and after 18 months, 24 months and 36 months of age. Destefano et al. [14] found a statistically significant relative risk of 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 – 2.14) at the 36 month cut-off (i.e., in a comparison of children receiving the MMR before versus after 36 months). Rather than concluding that the first MMR vaccine could be playing a causal role in autism in these children, the study authors instead attributed the increased risk to greater numbers of autistic children receiving timely vaccinations in order to participate in State of Georgia special education services.
(…)
When looking specifically at African American children (Table 2), the relationship between MMR timing and autism incidence became more profound (RR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.25-4.22, p = 0.0060) at 36 months of age. Again, this result was exclusively found in boys who showed statistically significant effects at both 24 months (RR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.09-2.77, p = 0.0200) and 36 months (RR = 3.36, 95% CI: 1.50-7.51, p = 0.0019) of age. This effect again was not seen in females.
a6c34191462a0663dd722c25e99493ee9010cec9.png

(…)
The results show a strong relationship between child age at the administration of the first MMR and autism incidence exclusively for African American boys which could indicate a role of the vaccine in the etiology of autism within this population group. This particular analysis was not completed in the original Destefano et al. [14] (CDC) study. Although the previous study considered MMR timing and African Americans in general, no statistically significant effect was observed. This is in contrast to our result for African Americans in general, because the CDC study limited the total African American cohort to include only those individuals who possessed a valid State of Georgia birth certificate which decreased the statistical power of their analysis.
(…)
It should be noted that a recent publication has shown that the prevalence of autism in African Americans is nearly 25% higher than that of whites [15]. This value was obtained when CDC data were appropriately analyzed based on socioeconomic status. This could be due to issues regarding vitamin D status with African Americans as it has been estimated that vitamin D sufficiency among whites is between 30-60% but is only 5-10% among African Americans [16].
 
Last edited:
For more on the (censored) William Thompson study that shows that vaccines cause autism in Afro-American boys and the retracted report on the (real) findings: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...lio-vaccines&p=6543416&viewfull=1#post6543416

The African American boys were enrolled in a school for autistic children. To be allowed into that school, they were required to be vaccinated. They were diagnosed in many cases before their vaccines meaning that the vaccine could not have caused it if it occurred before the child was vaccinated. Once that cohort was removed, there was no link.

The paper was retracted:

“The Editor and Publisher regretfully retract the article as there were undeclared competing interests on the part of the author which compromised the peer review process. Furthermore, post-publication peer review raised concerns about the validity of the methods and statistical analysis, therefore the Editors no longer have confidence in the soundness of the findings. We apologise to all affected parties for the inconvenience caused.”

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/now-retracted-autism-study-viral/story?id=25248179
 
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4639493/

The monitoring of vaccine adverse events during the 10 days of mass vaccination campaigns and over the next 42 days following the end of the mass campaign did not reveal any safety issues [11]. The only negative vaccine-related event occurred in Gouro, Chad, in December 2013, where a small group of vaccinees developed a range of unusual symptoms after vaccination that were later identified as an instance of mass hysteria, an unusual phenomenon that has been well described in the context of mass immunization campaigns [12–14]. The episode is described in more detail in an accompanying communication article [15]. Initially, a Chadian reporter described paralysis in PsA-TT vaccine recipients. Careful clinical examinations by physicians and a neurologist revealed that there were no cases of paralysis and that all affected individuals fully recovered over the ensuing days.


https://www.rawstory.com/2013/01/ch...etween-meningitis-vaccines-and-sick-children/

Chad officials: No link between meningitis vaccines and sick children

Chad’s government on Tuesday said a team of international experts have not been able to find any links between the hospitalisation of 38 children and their recent vaccinations against meningitis.

The children fell ill in the northern village of Gouro and were admitted to hospital after being vaccinated in a government campaign against the disease between December 11 and 15.

In a statement, the country’s health ministry said tests “failed to establish a causal link between the clinical manifestations observed in the patients and the MenAfriVac vaccine.”

Health Minister Mamouth Nahor N’Gawara said tests by experts at the World Health Organisation showed there was “no manufacturing fault” in the vaccine produced by the Serum Institute of India.

According to the statement, one child who never received the meningitis shot “complained of suffering from the same symptoms” found in the other children.

A local administration official said some of the children began to moan shortly after receiving their meningitis shot and then went into convulsions.

N’Gawara, who on Monday said the children’s state of health “is not worrying,” added they are now leading “normal lives”.

Meningitis outbreaks are frequent in the poor, landlocked Sahel country. “During the past 15 years, Chad has recorded more than 50,000 cases of meningitis with more than 5,000 deaths,” N’Gawara said.

In total, more than 100 million people in 10 African countries have been vaccinated against the disease.

500 were vaccinated in that one town alone.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top