The TRULY ***Official*** 2024 Election Season thread

[Anti Federalist]

Battlefield Expands as Trump Takes Lead in New Hampshire Poll

Former President Donald Trump leads incumbent Vice President Kamala Harris in New Hampshire, a state considered safely in her column a week ago.

“Amid signs that former President Donald Trump is slowly gaining momentum in the race for the White House,” writes the New Hampshire Journal, “a new New Hampshire Journal/Praecones Analytica poll released Sunday night finds he’s leading Vice President Kamala Harris in the Granite State.”

“Trump’s slim 50.2 to 49.8 percent lead is insignificant, well within the margin of error.”

 

[Brian4Liberty]

https://x.com/harmless_human/status/1850944937896124772

 

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/AntiFeder1776/status/1851012726308679871

 

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1851052214770340165

 

[PAF]

https://x.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1851052214770340165

Sure, let's work our @sses off to get him elected. For the sake of our nation

The analysis released Monday by the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget suggests a Harris presidency could increase the national debt over 10 years by $3.5 trillion. That’s even though the vice president’s campaign insists her proposed investments in the middle class and housing would be fully offset by higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy. Her campaign policy guide states that Harris is “committed to fiscal responsibility — making investments that will support our economy, while paying for them and reducing the deficit at the same time.”

The same analysis says former President Trump’s ideas could heap another $7.5 trillion onto the debt and possibly as much as $15.2 trillion.

Thread

Scott has a long anti-gun track record. Back in 2018, after the Parkland High School massacre in Florida, a Republican trifecta passed SB 7026, which implemented a bump stock ban, an increase in the age to buy a firearm, and a red flag gun confiscation order.

Everything that the prior president insisted on time and time again.

That, combined with Trump's signing into law the Fix NICS Act of 2017, his proposed Agenda47 Nationalized [Rudy Giuliani] "Stop and Frisk" and Militarized LEO Immunity, sure makes him a "lesser threat" than Harris. Trump even stated that he wants to use Federal Funding for all of this.

Will the next Sen Majority Leader push a federal red flag law?

All you see are 2 letters of an alphabet. Not records or numbers.

 

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/i/status/1851048926197006378

 

[Anti Federalist]

All you see are 2 letters of an alphabet. Not records or numbers.

You told me RFK Jr. was a man worthy of my support.

You said you'd participate in voting, for the first time in decades, to vote for him.

Why are you upset I'm listening to you and taking you at your word?

I have no idea how effective RFK Jr. would be.

I know many of his positions I do not agree with.

But I also know that I am convinced the single greatest danger that mankind faces right now is the release, unintentional or deliberate, of a manmade airborne viral pathogen with a mortality of +90 or greater.

There are three men in, or close to being in, government that I trust to even come close to addressing this issue and doing something about it:

Thomas Massie.

Rand Paul.

Robert Kennedy Jr.

And that is one of the five reasons why I'll vote Trump.

In the meantime I'm more than happy to talk about wings and bikes, but I thought you were heading out west for one last ride...I was waiting to hear about that.

 

[PAF]

https://x.com/i/status/1851048926197006378

While I don't care to see that crap [I simply ignore it until it goes away], I will pose the question, referring to Post #230... How much in Federal Tax Dollars or new Federal Agencies did Walz's walk across the street cost me?

You are pushing Fear Porn in order to implement the most draconian nationalized/federalized measures that every Republican Administration is known to do. I'll bet you even voted for "Patriot" Act TSA Bush W twice just because R.

 

[PAF]

You told me RFK Jr. was a man worthy of my support.

I already answered that at least a couple of times.

In the meantime I'm more than happy to talk about wings and bikes, but I thought you were heading out west for one last ride...I was waiting to hear about that.

I leave the 2nd week of November ;-)

 

[Anti Federalist]

While I don't care to see that crap [I simply ignore it until it goes away], I will pose the question, referring to Post #230... How much in Federal Tax Dollars or new Federal Agencies did Walz's walk across the street cost me?

You are pushing Fear Porn in order to implement the most draconian nationalized/federalized measures that every Republican Administration is known to do. I'll bet you even voted for "Patriot" Act TSA Bush W twice just because R.

I do not care about the national debt or government spending anymore.

It's all monopoly money and debt that will never be paid.

It's never going to stop and never going to go away, until this government collapses like the USSR did 35 years ago.

I don't think little kids should get dragged off to "Pride" parades, to march in favor of queeers while grown men walk around with their dicks hanging out.

You think that's OK?

I voted Harry Browne in 2000 and abstained in 2004.

 

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1850988488830898370

 

[Anti Federalist]

 

[PAF]

I do not care about the national debt or government spending anymore.

That's the common quote when it is a republican who outspends democrats. But, and you know that it is 1000% true, AS SOON as a democrat outspends a republican, it is right back to evil satanist globalist scum of the earth.

Will you agree that unprincipled hypocrites do that?

It's all monopoly money and debt that will never be paid.

Of course $19.99 gal of milk is not a problem at all under an R. You only won't be able to afford it if it's $8.99 gal under a D. That's the honest difference.

It's never going to stop and never going to go away, until this government collapses like the USSR did 35 years ago.

I just outlined the reason why in my previous sentences.

I don't think little kids should get dragged off to "Pride" parades, to march in favor of queeers while grown men walk around with their dicks hanging out.

You think that's OK?

No I don't think it's ok. But people do what they want to do and I'm not going to become the Morality Police that "republicans" are known for. My take is, if gays want to be gay and they can't have kids, it'll be less people to worry about down the road. I understand, though, that when Obummer convinced 'Merikan's "if you see something say something", today republicans are yesterdays democrats. Even though you may be, I'm not a democrat.

I voted Harry Browne in 2000 and abstained in 2004.

The reason I'm abstaining is because there ain't no way in hell I'm going to be complicit in electing a fascist-democrat into the R party. But, so far it has been infiltrated because of the likes of you, so why stop now

 

[TheTexan]

Sure, let's work our @sses off to get him elected. For the sake of our nation

I'm curious where you stand on RFK's point on free speech and the shutting down of Elon's X/Twitter.

Do you think that:
1) the Republican and Democrat party is the same in terms of free speech, and/or
2) the Democrat party isn't really that bad on free speech and free speech will be fine, and/or
3) if free speech is destroyed it's ultimately a good thing because destruction of nation is a good thing, and/or
4) free speech is just not an important issue for you, and/or
5) Republican party is better on free speech but it doesn't justify giving them any support, and/or
6) Something else?

 

[PAF]

I'm curious where you stand on RFK's point on free speech and the shutting down of Elon's X/Twitter.

Do you think that:
1) the Republican and Democrat party is the same in terms of free speech, and/or
2) the Democrat party isn't really that bad on free speech and free speech will be fine, and/or
3) if free speech is destroyed it's ultimately a good thing because destruction of nation is a good thing, and/or
4) free speech is just not an important issue for you, and/or
5) Republican party is better on free speech but it doesn't justify giving them any support, and/or
6) Something else?

I think Elon is going to sell X at some point and time now that his objective has been met.

I believe that psyops are designed behind closed doors for both parties to roll out, though, at that level there really isn't such thing as parties - it's only an illusion for the voting masses. I read an article not too long ago [I can't seem to find it at the moment] where there are an independent group of 15 people who decide which and how policies are to be rolled out for "both" parties during elections. They are higher up than the lobbyists and the names are not published. I'll keep digging to see if I can stumble across it again.

When the masses of people stand up for things like 1st and 2nd Amendments, not much can be done to restrict the people. Similar to the mandated vax which is no longer mandated. I'm not concerned about which party says this or that, I'm more concerned about newly established agencies which cost ton-load more money which will be rolled out nationwide using federal tax dollars. That's all that I care about and not much about anything else.

 

[susano]

With such a tight race, I'm worried that that jerk "comedian" blew it for Trump.

 

[PAF]

With such a tight race, I'm worried that that jerk "comedian" blew it for Trump.

I certainly hope he blew it for Trump. But that's just me because I'm actually principled.

Maybe you're worried because deep down, you're a fascist-democrat who can't wait for him to take office [again]. The R party has been infiltrated for quite some time, it has exponentially moved further left of center since Trump D I mean R I mean D.

 

[TheTexan]

I think Elon is going to sell X at some point and time now that his objective has been met.

I believe that psyops are designed behind closed doors for both parties to roll out, though, at that level there really isn't such thing as parties - it's only an illusion for the voting masses. I read an article not too long ago [I can't seem to find it at the moment] where there are an independent group of 15 people who decide which and how policies are to be rolled out for "both" parties during elections. They are higher up than the lobbyists and the names are not published. I'll keep digging to see if I can stumble across it again.

When the masses of people stand up for things like 1st and 2nd Amendments, not much can be done to restrict the people. Similar to the mandated vax which is no longer mandated. I'm not concerned about which party says this or that, I'm more concerned about newly established agencies which cost ton-load more money which will be rolled out nationwide using federal tax dollars. That's all that I care about and not much about anything else.

So basically, the machine is gonna keep doing its machine thing, you just want it to run as cheap as possible. I can respect that.

Pretty much everyone, myself included, just has their own preferences on how they want their slavery to be as comfortable as possible. We just disagree on what those preferences are sometimes. Which leads me to think, we as a forum/movement/whatever, might be arguing about the wrong stuff lol.

 

[TheTexan]

I certainly hope he blew it for Trump. But that's just me because I'm actually principled.

Follow up question:

If you primarily just care about government expenditure, why do you care if Trump wins or loses? From an expenditure standpoint both parties are indeed pretty much identical.

 

[PAF]

So basically, the machine is gonna keep doing its machine thing, you just want it to run as cheap as possible. I can respect that.

Pretty much everyone, myself included, just has their own preferences on how they want their slavery to be as comfortable as possible. We just disagree on what those preferences are sometimes. Which leads me to think, we as a forum/movement/whatever, might be arguing about the wrong stuff lol.

Well, all indications are that the folks waaayyyy above lobbyists and not part of the WH have already decided that the full-blown Police-State is ready to be rolled out.

Percentage-wise, the gay community is still tiny in numbers, and unlike [MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION] I couldn't care less if they have a sex change operation or not. Those gay-pride marches are nothing but a fad, and as long as I don't cross the same street it doesn't affect me one way or the other. Eventually, just in time for the next election season, it will no longer be a fad, but something else that they can generate Fear Porn for the voters.

Trump himself has written and announced his Police-State agendas funded by federal tax dollars. But people are so much in arms about "he/she/it is a q-u-eer!" that they are going to vote for said Police-State and not think anything of it. In 4 or 8 years Giuliani's massively expensive and anti-BoR Nationwide "Stop & Frisk" and militarized LEO and Immunity will be as commonplace as Patriot Act and TSA and folks will think nothing of it.

By that time, they will come up with another oh-poor-baby-it-irritates "republicans" *again* and they will be happy to shred the last remnants of the BoR until they no longer matter/exist anymore. Harris' $3 Trillion versus Trumps projected $15 Trillion seems like a sensible trade among "conservative republicans" who no longer care about spending. Spending which is necessary to roll this garbage out.

Every. Republican. Administration. The. Same. Thing. Happens.