The "TikTok ban" goes beyond TikTok. It is another huge step toward total control.

[69360]

I still feel the same about this as I did last year. I'm actually ok with banning tik tok specificlally by name for the stated reason that it's Chinese owned and there are spying concerns. As far as the rest of the language that is in this bill, go fuck your self, not ok.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

https://twitter.com/bigmadcrab/status/1768004610935902546

https://twitter.com/DanielLMcAdams/status/1767942523563934005

 

[unknown]

 

[acptulsa]

 

[Snowball]

The truth is worse.

The Republican House passing the TikTok ban is all about shutting down support for Palestine right now, it is backed by The Lobby. TikTok is free speech, even more than "X" or the lesser platforms. Rubio and Warner push it because they don't want independent coverage of the UFOs and military movements. Warner and Rubio are in charge of the UFO stuff, with Warner being the true manager, and Rubio the go-along student. They are Deep State all the way. The Deep State does not want Americans to be able to broadcast and share real events in real time, or organize assemblies, or have the ability to make important, challenging truths go viral to millions in minutes. That's too much power in the people's hands. When the Tyranny Grid goes full swing, it needs to control all social media so that people cannot point out and resist implementation.

If there is a False Flag, whether it be fake weather like Maui and "wildfires" or a mass shooting or bomb, they don't want average people to be able to capture and share reality. They want full control over perceived reality, as part of their full spectrum domestic operations.

Schumer is in no hurry but is probably going along with it, but that's really about not banning TikTok but getting it into managed hands, so that the Chinese can't decide who to sell it to if they are forced to divest of it. This means getting it into certain hands, not allowing Kevin O'Leary to buy it. Trump is doing a 180 on the issue, while he was Potus, he was Pro-Ban and/or putting it in "American" hands. Now, he's just trying to be Mr. Popular, because it's easy, he is not in power, it's a win-win to appear defending free speech, whereas the truth is far different.

If he was in power, he'd be right there with the Deep State puppets, crying "China Bad", like before. Trump happens to get donations from powerful Israelis in Oracle like CEO Safra Catz, and Jeffrey Yass the Israeli billionaire who owns 15% of ByteDance, TikTok's parent co. And it's Trump who got them that, by forcing the Chinese to take on "American" firms. Basically, Oracle cloud hosts TT in the US thanks to Trump, who set it up for Ellison. Which means Israel and The Lobby runs cloud operations right now. Trump is still 100% property of the Israelis. He just took millions from Miriam Adelson. His Israeli donors already have a foot in the door with Bytedance/ TT (thanks to him in 2020 pushing its US ops into Ellison's co), and he wants to wait until he is Potus, then he will transfer it into Israeli hands totally, as soon as he can pay them off, he will flip and say it has to be "American", meaning Israeli. Everything I just wrote is 100% searchable, just search the terms and it's right there, but people still don't understand. I mean seriously, it's all right there, but nobody talks about it. These are extremely crafty, sly and educated people running circles around a juvenile, simpleton population.

 

[Occam's Banana]

I'm actually ok with banning tik tok specificlally by name for the stated reason that it's Chinese owned and there are spying concerns. As far as the rest of the language that is in this bill, go fuck your self, not ok.

Sorry, but if you're "actually okay" with letting the camel's nose in the tent, then you've got no business bitching about it when the rest of the camel follows.

The government shouldn't be banning shit - except for (more) government.

 

[69360]

Sorry, but if you're "actually okay" with letting the camel's nose in the tent, then you've got no business bitching about it when the rest of the camel follows.

The government shouldn't be banning $#@! - except for (more) government.

Sorry, I think the reasoning behind banning just tik tok, by name for the reason given is fine. The rest is crap. In other words, I don't support this bill as written. There is nothing inherently wrong with that position.

 

[CCTelander]

Sorry, I think the reasoning behind banning just tik tok, by name for the reason given is fine. The rest is crap. In other words, I don't support this bill as written. There is nothing inherently wrong with that position.

So, authoritarianism is A-OK so long as it’s your brand of authoritarianism?

SMGDH

Wanna know one big reason why the political wing of the so-called “liberty movement” suffers one humiliating defeat after another, and has done for the too many decades to even bother counting? Because so many of its nembers aren’t even aiming atvanything resembling liberty to begin with.

 

[unknown]

//

What doesn't Izrael control at this point.

If not directly, like tiktok, indirectly.

People are praising the Argentinian, Chile, guy for privatizing a bunch of stuff, it was all basically sold to Izrael...

 

[dannno]

TikTok is free speech, even more than "X" or the lesser platforms.

Absolute bullshit..

Just because they allow pro-Palestinian content doesn't mean they are "more free speech", they just boosted speech on that one issue.

X allowed pro-Palestinean content and they allow free speech to a very large extent, what is X banning currently that Tik Tok doesn't??

Tik Tok banned a channel for posting a video where they showed data that the most depressed demographic of American society is working women.. free speech my ass.. they boost/promote all kinds of transgender and socialist nonsense and videos that break young people's brains. It's not just what a platform bans that makes it a bad platform, it's what they boost.

Tik Tok is horrible. This bill is total crap, but if they made a case in court, like Rand Paul says, and forced them to divest to a company like Rumble it would probably be for the better. If the divest to Facebook, I don't know that it would make all that much difference.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1768380032479551699

 

[Snowball]

What doesn't Izrael control at this point.

If not directly, like tiktok, indirectly.

People ate praising the Argentinian, Chile, guy for privatizing a bunch of stuff, it was all basically sold to Izrael...

privatization is how they gobble up the world. heck, it's what they did to our national currency itself. privatized it.
then it was just a matter of time, and we have arrived.

 

[69360]

So, authoritarianism is A-OK so long as it’s your brand of authoritarianism?

SMGDH

Wanna know one big reason why the political wing of the so-called “liberty movement” suffers one humiliating defeat after another, and has done for the too many decades to even bother counting? Because so many of its nembers aren’t even aiming atvanything resembling liberty to begin with.

It's controlled by the Chinese government, nobody disputes that. I believe that could be a real security and spying risk.

I don't have a problem with that specific action, but the bill as a whole is crap and shouldn't be passed as written.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Sorry, I think the reasoning behind banning just tik tok, by name for the reason given is fine. The rest is crap.

And like I said (and which you, of course, failed to address) is that it WILL NOT stop with just the "camel's nose" of TikTok.

In fact, it won't even start with just TikTok (as you yourself acknowledge when you say "the rest is crap").

There is nothing inherently wrong with that position.

Of course there is.

Don't like TikTok? Then don't use it - and butt the hell out of other peoples' business while you're at it.

Problem solved.

 

[WarriorLiberty]

It's controlled by the Chinese government, nobody disputes that. I believe that could be a real security and spying risk.

I don't have a problem with that specific action, but the bill as a whole is crap and shouldn't be passed as written.

As if NSA,CIA,FBI arent spying on the American people without any court warrants...

 

[Occam's Banana]

It's controlled by the Chinese government, [so] I don't have a problem with [banning it].

First up: banning any apps deemed by the feds to be "controlled by the Chinese government".

Next up: banning any apps deemed by the feds to be "controlled by the Chinese Russian government" ... and then any apps deemed by the feds to be "controlled influenced by the Chinese government" ... and then apps deemed by the feds to be "controlled influenced by the Chinese Russian government" ... and so on ... and so on ... and on ... and on ...

And there you and the feds will be, telling everyone "this is fine".

 

[Occam's Banana]

Meanwhile:

BREAKING INSIDE THE PENTAGON: Associate Director in the Office of the Secretary of Defense says, “Why not just have an open border?” “Tear down the wall.”

“I think we should repeal the Second Amendment and take the guns all away!” says Jason Beck, who has a classified security clearance and works for the Department of Defense. Beck, who uses a fake name Aiden Grey in his meetings with a disguised James O’Keefe, describes his extremist policies, including “mobilizing the national guard” to confiscate guns from people’s homes. Beck says he wants a “monopoly on state violence,” a concept he describes as “‘We {the government), are the only ones with guns.”

Jason Beck works in Total Force Requirements & Sourcing Policy in the Office of @SecDef Lloyd Austin. This office oversees the @DeptofDefense and acts as the principal defense policy maker and adviser to the President of the United States. Beck says he helps “writes answers for testimony” of “the department’s senior leadership – basically they go over to the Hill for hearings on the department’s posture.”

In this shocking footage we get an INSIDE look as Jason Beck tells James O'Keefe, “we need to pack the Supreme court,” ban the United States Senate, and abolish the electoral college. He also discusses his “bottom surgery’ being painful and the changes to his plumbing.

FULL STORY BELOW

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1768009862963728480

But for some reason, I'm supposed be concerned about a "Chinese controlled" (boogity-boogity!) social media app that no one is forced to use?

Yeah, no.

Fuck that.

Fuck that with a rusty spike.

 

[WarriorLiberty]

First up: banning any apps deemed by the feds to be "controlled by the Chinese government".

Next up: banning any apps deemed by the feds to be "controlled by the Chinese Russian government" ... and then any apps deemed by the feds to be "controlled influenced by the Chinese government" ... and then apps deemed by the feds to be "controlled influenced by the Chinese Russian government" ... and so on ... and so on ... and on ... and on ...

And there you'll be, telling everyone "this is fine".

They will be banning apps from India, Russia,China because those countries are "adversary" to the "American International based orders"

 

[Occam's Banana]

I'm actually ok with banning tik tok specificlally by name for the stated reason that it's Chinese owned and there are spying concerns. As far as the rest of the language that is in this bill, go fuck your self, not ok.

Sorry, but if you're "actually okay" with letting the camel's nose in the tent, then you've got no business bitching about it when the rest of the camel follows.

The government shouldn't be banning shit - except for (more) government.

Speaking for myself, I think people should probably be much more concerned about "Chinese controlled (or influenced)" politicians that everyone is forced to obey than "Chinese controlled (or influenced)" social media apps that no one is forced to use.

But maybe that's just me.

 

[unknown]

privatization is how they gobble up the world. heck, it's what they did to our national currency itself. privatized it.
then it was just a matter of time, and we have arrived.

Don't get me wrong, I'm no socialist but something seems intuitively wrong when the same few handful of people continue to strengthen their grip over the entire planet.