Paul Or Nothing II
Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2011
- Messages
- 2,288
+1 for OP
It's not that Ron doesn't talk about interests on savings, he does but he does so passingly so may be he needs to expand on it & spend more time on it to reach out to the masses who probably can't keep up with him.
PLEASE, I beg of you, DON'T spread such videos, it's like those "money masters" videos that fools people into thinking that govt (which is just politicians & bureaucrats) controlling the money will be any better than banks controlling it. The idea of "govt-issued-money" fools people into believing that everybody will be well-off if govt created money & used it for "social good"; this is like pushing them towards communism & socialism; we DON'T need that. We should try to let people know about banking but then push them in the direction of sound commodity-money like gold, silver & such.
How should he "steer clear"? If they ask him about those issues then he MUST defend his position & explain why he believes it should be that way, he can't just avoid the topic or curtail it too much, that'd just make people think that Ron is just another politician who dodges uncomfortable questions without offering sufficient explanation for his positions.
As I've said, may be he should spend more time on interest rates on savings if possible but I'm tired of hearing that he shouldn't dwell on drugs, prostitution, etc as if he has any choice but to defend his position when interviewers ask him about it.
It's not that Ron doesn't talk about interests on savings, he does but he does so passingly so may be he needs to expand on it & spend more time on it to reach out to the masses who probably can't keep up with him.
I still think a simple approach to explain what the fed reserve does to undermind every American incl a powerful senior voter group would result in a tea party sweep ... Consider explaining it like this ( but with American context ) ~ http://www.youtube.com/v/WPSoQfumzQ0&hl=en&fs=1
if our ads hit this home ~ we win imo
scroll down for additional video
'time for constitutional credit & dividends'... we won the war and lost the peace in free enterprise ... stifling socialist welfare system could be replaced by making each person a plough share holder of USA and with a dividend ... the banksters use compounding interest against you ... This would allow it to work for you ... then like a trust company or ma bell , you are a shareholder in America !
(look at ND and it's approach with it's own bank = prosperity )
PLEASE, I beg of you, DON'T spread such videos, it's like those "money masters" videos that fools people into thinking that govt (which is just politicians & bureaucrats) controlling the money will be any better than banks controlling it. The idea of "govt-issued-money" fools people into believing that everybody will be well-off if govt created money & used it for "social good"; this is like pushing them towards communism & socialism; we DON'T need that. We should try to let people know about banking but then push them in the direction of sound commodity-money like gold, silver & such.
Point taken, guess I meant just trying to steer clear of non-starter issues that create huge negatives.
How should he "steer clear"? If they ask him about those issues then he MUST defend his position & explain why he believes it should be that way, he can't just avoid the topic or curtail it too much, that'd just make people think that Ron is just another politician who dodges uncomfortable questions without offering sufficient explanation for his positions.
As I've said, may be he should spend more time on interest rates on savings if possible but I'm tired of hearing that he shouldn't dwell on drugs, prostitution, etc as if he has any choice but to defend his position when interviewers ask him about it.
Last edited: