The "Secret" PATRIOT Act (NSA CIA UFIA)

Carson

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
6,812
I'm pretty sure I heard about this years before the PATRIOT Act so the article may have other facts sort of mixed up. But who am I kidding? It is the best article on some of the unconstitutional spying I've come across.

Then again we no longer control our government, our war department, or our borders. I would imagine, whoever or whatever, new world order they are working for, it is probably just the way they do what ever they please. After all. They can afford it. They use our money.



The "Secret" PATRIOT Act


Written by Thomas R. Eddlem
Thursday, 14 July 2011 00:00


During the U.S. Senate debate over the PATRIOT Act renewal on May 24, Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) told his fellow Senators: "There is secret law where, in effect, the interpretation of the law, as it stands today, is kept secret. So here we are, Senators on the floor, and we have colleagues of both political parties wanting to participate. Certainly, if you are an American, you are in Oregon or Colorado, you are listening in, you want to be part of this discussion. But yet the executive branch keeps secret how they are interpreting the law."

Secret PATRIOT Act? What was Wyden talking about?

The American people aren’t allowed to know. But they got a taste of how it could be used to suppress freedom a month later, when the New York Times reported on June 16 that former CIA supervisor Glenn L. Carle accused senior Bush administration officials of trolling secret CIA files for negative information about one of its public critics, University of Michigan Professor Juan Cole. Cole is the author of a popular blog that had criticized the Bush administration’s Iraq policy. The Times reported that David B. Low, the National Intelligence Officer (NIO) for Transnational Threats at the National Intelligence Council, asked Carle in 2005: “What do you think we might know about him, or could find out that could discredit him?” After being rebuffed for making an inappropriate request, Low continued:

“But what might we know about him?... Does he drink? What are his views? Is he married?”

Carle rebuffed the request again, stressing that it was illegal. But the next day, the New York Times explained, when Carle was “on his way to a meeting in the C.I.A.’s front office, a secretary asked if he would drop off a folder to be delivered by courier to the White House. Mr. Carle said he opened it and stopped cold. Inside, he recalled, was a memo from Mr. Low about Juan Cole that included a paragraph with ‘inappropriate, derogatory remarks’ about his lifestyle.”

“I couldn’t believe this was happening,” Carle told the Times. “People were accepting it, like you had to be part of the team.”


Snip...


Nothing to Ignore


But there’s nothing laughable about a naked attack on political critics using secret intelligence. U.S. intelligence agencies currently have the capacity to download everything “from” or “through” the Internet, including private e-mails, web traffic, and telephone records. According to a May 23 New Yorker article by Jane Mayer, the NSA has indexed private Internet data in a “Google-style” searchable database for intelligence agencies to use. The Juan Cole incident is the first public case where the office of the President allegedly used U.S. intelligence agencies to gather dirt on its critics in the media or of rival politicians since Richard Nixon’s “enemies list” in the 1970s.

Snip...


Wiretapping Without Warrants

The gap Wyden is describing is vast; it’s the size of the entire Internet. The amount of data that the NSA is pulling from the American people can be culled from budget documents for the multi-billion-dollar data centers the NSA is building around the world. The NSA is now building multi-billion-dollar data storage facilities in Maryland, Utah, Texas, and even the United Kingdom (where the NSA culls Internet data generated abroad). The 1.5-million-square-foot Utah facility alone, which broke ground in January, will store data in the yottabyte range.


Snip...


Here is a link for the article in its juicy entirety;

http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/8175-the-qsecretq-patriot-act
 
Is anyone else wondering what I am? - What on earth are they using for data storage???

A trillion is a 1 followed by 9 zero's. A Yottabyte is a 1 followed by 15 zero's. - and that's the number of GigaBytes! Just to keep the math easy, lets say a GB costs $1, that means just the storage for one facility would cost one million trillion dollars.... and the country is underwater because it's 14.6 Trillion in debt. Then consider that there are 6 of these data centers... :eek:

What’s a yottabyte? According to Devin Coldewey of CrunchGear.com:

There are a thousand gigabytes in a terabyte, a thousand terabytes in a petabyte, a thousand petabytes in an exabyte, a thousand exabytes in a zettabyte, and a thousand zettabytes in a yottabyte. In other words, a yottabyte is 1,000,000,000,000,000GB. Are you paranoid yet?

-t
 
Last edited:
Is anyone else wondering what I am? - What on earth are they using for data storage???

A trillion is a 1 followed by 9 zero's. A Yottabyte is a 1 followed by 15 zero's. - and that's the number of GigaBytes! Just to keep the math easy, lets say a GB costs $1, that means just the storage for one facility would cost one million trillion dollars.... and the country is underwater because it's 14.6 Trillion in debt. Then consider that there are 6 of these data centers... :eek:



-t

Good point.

What ever it is, they are using our money to pay for it. Even then the cost still seems unsurmountable.


Hard drives for working data? Some type of disk for archive?
 
Last edited:
Some readers might be inclined to say: “I’m not doing anything wrong, so I’m not worried about government wiretapping.” But the real power of surveillance is not just discovering illegal acts. Rather, it’s in the ability to blackmail and intimidate both the great masses and political opposition leaders. Warrantless surveillance allows the government to find out anything embarrassing about anyone on the Internet. It allows the government to know — and blackmail — people with embarrassing medical histories (substance abuse, mental illness, incontinence, STDs, etc.), Internet traffic (in pornography, foul language, wasted time at work on Facebook, etc.), people who have made negative or angry remarks about bosses (or colleagues, family members, etc.), poor grades in school, disciplinary measures or negative reviews at work, and an almost limitless list of perfectly legal but embarrassing measures.

Even a citizen without any sin (if such a thing exists), who possesses a perfect health, work, and school record, can be impacted by the wide accessibility for blackmail by government officials with such unfettered access to Americans’ private data. Even if the perfect person is immune from blackmail, his elected officials, judges, lawyers, or news persons may not be. That “perfect” man or woman should be able to see that the whole of society could be bullied and blackmailed by a government that sees all of its citizens’ personal data. Moreover, even completely innocent actions such as purchasing nail polish remover or hydrogen peroxide at the local pharmacy may put a citizen on a federal terrorist watch list, or no-fly list, according to some reports, because the NSA retains such sales records from bank and credit card records.

Okay, that has got to be one of the most horrifying things I've ever read.

And theoretically, a search with the right parameters could create a list of "undesirables." Imagine what Hitler would have done with this technology.
 
Last edited:
It certainly gives them the ability to sell you down the river. No matter where your headed they can see your fixed right up when you get there.
 
I'm surprised more people aren't talking about this.


Or trying to do something about it.

I first head about it from Leo Laporte on The Screensavers decades ago. He was saying how something like a black box or a black box rooms were being installed at all of the ISP's. Everything that went in or out had to go through it. I was thinking that it was before 9-11-2001. From the dates I see on my computer maybe The Screensaver story came out in 2002.

It was a heavy duty sounding story that they tried to get more information on. The story was never picked up by any news agencies. None seem to care about the constitution or an honest government. It just sort of died out with TechTV. They did go all the way back east after being invited to visit the NSA. When they did the show it was the NSA that is responsible for measurement standards. Something like that.?
 
Last edited:
Moreover, even completely innocent actions such as purchasing nail polish remover or hydrogen peroxide at the local pharmacy may put a citizen on a federal terrorist watch list, or no-fly list, according to some reports, because the NSA retains such sales records from bank and credit card records.


Charges on your bank card or credit card aren't itemized. It's merely an amount and the business that charged it. Not minimizing anything here, but little things like this show the author's paranoia and ignorance in their haste.
 
As to why its not being discussed, I think the forums are becoming desensitized to this sort of thing. That's scary in its own right.
 
Back
Top