Here we have someone fresh off of a temporary ban, and who came back with a vengeance, as you yourself admitted.
Petar is honest and sometimes blunt. You yourself are quite blunt. He doesn't promote open borders or globalism, which is not in vogue with some here these days.
Now, everyone knows that Hitler was no globalist, beyond his desire to take the globe from the globalists. Yet he started a war that didn't end in his lifetime, and destroyed his own nation with it. And every schoolchild knows it.
By bringing up Hitler, you seem to be attempting to equate anyone who believes in putting their own country first as like Hitler. Do you really believe that? Putting your own country first used to be called being an American.
There's no reason for a libertarian to rewrite history in this manner. But it certainly does qualify as a sales pitch for Trump, doesn't it?
If you are saying that globalists and their useful idiots left a door wide open for an American who actually put America first to walk though, I would say, ABSOLUTELY! Imagine that.
Let's imagine for a moment that LLS is considering rejoining us, and is lurking at this very moment. Is the admission that Trump is trying to steal the world's oil, combined with a contention that he's trying to do it as efficiently as possible, going to entice her to log in and join the conversation?
Possibly not. But, imagine if the many who left this site when it took an observable swing leftward, in addition to other Americans who love their country, might think if they see other people who aren't trying to run what is left of their nation in the dirt and spit on it.
Painting with a broad brush (is a Sanders supporter not capable of deciding that socialism is bad, but war is worse?), insulting potential supporters, and nakedly promoting Trump (and not using any provable facts to do it).
You mean like all the names that Ron and Rand supporters have been called, after they said they were going to vote for Trump, after Rand dropped out? Like that?
(and not using any provable facts to do it)
Many provable facts have been posted, but they are ignored and the libel is continued.
Since when is it a given that the antiwar faction is afraid of 'third' parties, and what is there about Mr. Conquer the Middle East and Take Their Oil is going to attract the antiwar faction?
I haven't seen anyone say that. But, you do realize that the "antiwar" faction is but one small sliver of what was the Ron Paul movement, right? In fact, just the term alone sends shivers up the spine of most traditional conservatives, because the people using it were leftist pacifists back in the day.
Our best hope to form a winning coalition, and your best hope of restoring traffic to this place, lies in forming coalitions, and the antiwar group is about as big and active a group as any of us could ever hope to coalesce with. Would it not be wise to make this place attractive to them, now that their horse is about to be eliminated from the race?
You want this place to be limited to libertarians. Just be honest about it.
Trump people have about a hundred echo chambers they can hang out in.
And here you are suggesting Ron and Rand supporters, who, after Rand dropped out have chosen to vote for Trump, should get the hell out. How quaint. Maybe you should start your own forum.
Those who are here, therefore, are pretty likely to have an agenda.
Yes, and that agenda is the same as it always has been. Attempting to save my nation from total destruction and my liberty with it. But, I will admit, that it's rather frustrating to run into some here who claim to be such liberty-supporters, yet promoting the same agenda as the globalists who are trying to destroy us.
And a coalition for liberty is not it.
Sure it is. But, it doesn't include the destruction of the nation, which some here apparently believe is a necessity for their version of "liberty".
A bit disingenuous, don't you think. Since I said that to you in response for YOU telling Petar to get lost.
