The R[evol]lution's Myers-Briggs Personalility Type

What type are you?

  • ISTJ

    Votes: 27 4.8%
  • ISFJ

    Votes: 11 2.0%
  • INFJ

    Votes: 42 7.5%
  • INTJ

    Votes: 214 38.1%
  • ISTP

    Votes: 19 3.4%
  • ISFP

    Votes: 7 1.2%
  • INFP

    Votes: 42 7.5%
  • INTP

    Votes: 82 14.6%
  • ESTP

    Votes: 5 0.9%
  • ESFP

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • ENFP

    Votes: 18 3.2%
  • ENTP

    Votes: 33 5.9%
  • ESTJ/ESFJ (explain which - I've only got 15 options)

    Votes: 9 1.6%
  • ENFJ

    Votes: 10 1.8%
  • ENTJ

    Votes: 40 7.1%

  • Total voters
    561
A quick web search claims that Ron is a ............................ ( wait for it ) ............................. INTJ. :)

Thats really surprising considering all of the "people" stuff that he does on a daily basis. There is no way that I could do it. I would get sick and tired of the people in no time.
 
infj-
"Beneath the quiet exterior, INFJs hold deep convictions about the weightier matters of life. Those who are activists -- INFJs gravitate toward such a role -- are there for the cause, not for personal glory or political power."
and-
"Writing, counseling, public service and even politics are areas where INFJs frequently find their niche."

That's me, well according the test=)
sounds like Ron Paul a bit too, eh?(not that Im comparing myself to him=)
 
The first time I took one of these tests was my freshman year in college and I was an ENFP. The second time I took it I was a borderline E/INFP. Today I just took it again and I'm an INFP...

Your Type is INFP

Strength of the preferences %

Introverted: 11
Intuitive: 25
Feeling: 62
Perceiving: 11
 
Thats really surprising considering all of the "people" stuff that he does on a daily basis. There is no way that I could do it. I would get sick and tired of the people in no time.
Maybe he does too. :) BTW, so would/do I.
 
U.S.A. Population Breakdown (per wikipedia.com)
ISTJ 11.6%
ISFJ 13.8%
INFJ 1.5%
INTJ 2.1%
ISTP 5.4%
ISFP 8.8%
INFP 4.3%
INTP 3.3%
ESTP 4.3%
ESFP 8.5%
ENFP 8.1%
ENTP 3.2%
ESTJ 8.7%
ESFJ 12.3%
ENFJ 2.4%
ENTJ 1.8%

(INFJ) I always new I knew I was an oddball, this just confirms it.
 
Last edited:
U.S.A. Population Breakdown (per wikipedia.com)
ISTJ 11.6%
ISFJ 13.8%
INFJ 1.5%
INTJ 2.1%
ISTP 5.4%
ISFP 8.8%
INFP 4.3%
INTP 3.3%
ESTP 4.3%
ESFP 8.5%
ENFP 8.1%
ENTP 3.2%
ESTJ 8.7%
ESFJ 12.3%
ENFJ 2.4%
ENTJ 1.8%

(INJF) I always new I knew I was an oddball, this just confirms it.

All of the big numbers are on S. I think that S is what makes sheeple.
 
INTJ of course, and my hypothesis from earlier is proven correct :D

INTJ's RULE!! We just need to get better at getting out and persuading others of what is good for them. We can not assume that just by spreading the message of truth people will understand it. Everything must be broken down into little palatable tid-bits for the rest to understand, otherwise you get the xenophobic effect. :cool:
 
Heres how I scored

Percentages of Results:
E/I ------- S/N ------ T/F ------ J/P
62/38 ---- 26/74 ---- 71/29 --- 47/53

Depending on how Im feeling that day I go from ENTP to ENTJ
 
I cant stand personality tests like this. In the OP you listed about 15 descriptions. Everyone of them is overwhelmingly positive and pleasent. According to this test it is not possible to have a bad personality. What if I spend my time belittling people. I dont like to think or feel, and I often get angry and beat my wife. According to this test I would still have some mushy feel-good personality type.
 
Exactly my thoughts.

Do you think any of this is genetic?

From now on, instead of deciding who to date on whether he/ she is hot or has a good personality, you have to give them a Myers-Briggs. Only N's may breed with other N's, so we can have a whole new generation of N's to combat the sheeple.

Ok that's kind of scary.
 
How about a constitutional amendment that only Ns can reproduce? :D ( Let me guess only 5% would support and vote for it. :) )
 
Last edited:
I cant stand personality tests like this. In the OP you listed about 15 descriptions. Everyone of them is overwhelmingly positive and pleasent. According to this test it is not possible to have a bad personality. What if I spend my time belittling people. I dont like to think or feel, and I often get angry and beat my wife. According to this test I would still have some mushy feel-good personality type.

These are brief, positive aspects of said personalities.

I'm sure you could find more information regarding the pros and cons of each one of them.

Edit - like this,

Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ’s Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.

This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete’, paralleling that of many Fs — only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.

Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to “work at” a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications.
 
i encourage anyone here who may be an INT to check out www.INTJforum.com

lots of really interesting discussion there.

did you know that Rudy Guiliani is supposedly an INTJ as well?

actually, it seems most villainous megolamaniacial types are INTJs... we seem to be the positive exception :)
 
I'm INTP.

As for the higher rates of INTJ/INTPs here, it's a known phenomenon that MBTI polls on the internet are skewed towards introverted intuitives, because INTs and INFs are more likely to hang out online.

However, it doesn't surprise me that there are a lot of NTs behind Paul. It may back up one of my suspicions about how we've (or at least people on this forum) been going about campaigning. I've been seeing many people saying "this election must be won using rationality, not emotion." What's bad about that though, is that only a quarter or less of the population are NT "rationals." It's easy for rationals to convert others who also primarily operate using rationality. But in order to get the other 75% to see the light, we need to learn to use a multiplicity of methods and understand that maybe the reason others are getting turned off is because we are going about educating them the wrong way for their personality type. If you can, when you ask someone what the issues they are interested in are, try to determine their personality (or at least whether they are N-intuitives or S- sensors and whether they favor logic/feeling) and adjust argument methods accordingly.
It may help A LOT. And yes, a lot of sheeple are S-types. ;) (though I have seen other INTPs that do not support Paul, so sheepleness is not exclusive to type...)
 
INTJ

Does this sound like us? :D

Masterminds are the most open-minded of all the types. No idea is too far-fetched to be entertained-if it is useful. Masterminds are natural brainstormers, always open to new concepts and, in fact, aggressively seeking them. They are also alert to the consequences of applying new ideas or positions. Theories which cannot be made to work are quickly discarded by the Masterminds. On the other hand, Masterminds can be quite ruthless in implementing effective ideas, seldom counting personal cost in terms of time and energy.
 
Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
Strength of the preferences %
11 88 62 22


INTJ.
 
Back
Top