The R[evol]lution's Myers-Briggs Personalility Type

What type are you?

  • ISTJ

    Votes: 27 4.8%
  • ISFJ

    Votes: 11 2.0%
  • INFJ

    Votes: 42 7.5%
  • INTJ

    Votes: 214 38.1%
  • ISTP

    Votes: 19 3.4%
  • ISFP

    Votes: 7 1.2%
  • INFP

    Votes: 42 7.5%
  • INTP

    Votes: 82 14.6%
  • ESTP

    Votes: 5 0.9%
  • ESFP

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • ENFP

    Votes: 18 3.2%
  • ENTP

    Votes: 33 5.9%
  • ESTJ/ESFJ (explain which - I've only got 15 options)

    Votes: 9 1.6%
  • ENFJ

    Votes: 10 1.8%
  • ENTJ

    Votes: 40 7.1%

  • Total voters
    561
INTJ

78 62 12 11

I agree with the description of the INTJ. It fits me pretty well. Except the climbing to position of responsibility part. I usually get kept low because I vocalize my opinion honestly about stuff and don't kiss enough ass.
 
INTJ

78 62 12 11

I agree with the description of the INTJ. It fits me pretty well. Except the climbing to position of responsibility part. I usually get kept low because I vocalize my opinion honestly about stuff and don't kiss enough ass.

Have you read about intp? What you describe might mean you are more p than j...
 
I took this test twice in high school and always scored INTP. Guess I could take it again but it'd probably be the same result. What's with all the INTJs, that personality type is supposed to be rare? Whatever, I'll just go hang with Socrates we're on the same level.
 
I don't know how much I trust these tests, because I constantly flip flop between ENFJ and ENTP every time I take them, and both descriptions seem pretty much completely accurate.
 
INTP
56 62 12 11

Architects need not be thought of as only interested in drawing blueprints for buildings or roads or bridges. They are the master designers of all kinds of theoretical systems, including school curricula, corporate strategies, and new technologies. For Architects, the world exists primarily to be analyzed, understood, explained - and re-designed. External reality in itself is unimportant, little more than raw material to be organized into structural models. What is important for Architects is that they grasp fundamental principles and natural laws, and that their designs are elegant, that is, efficient and coherent.

Architects are rare - maybe one percent of the population - and show the greatest precision in thought and speech of all the types. They tend to see distinctions and inconsistencies instantaneously, and can detect contradictions no matter when or where they were made. It is difficult for an Architect to listen to nonsense, even in a casual conversation, without pointing out the speaker's error. And in any serious discussion or debate Architects are devastating, their skill in framing arguments giving them an enormous advantage. Architects regard all discussions as a search for understanding, and believe their function is to eliminate inconsistencies, which can make communication with them an uncomfortable experience for many.

Ruthless pragmatists about ideas, and insatiably curious, Architects are driven to find the most efficient means to their ends, and they will learn in any manner and degree they can. They will listen to amateurs if their ideas are useful, and will ignore the experts if theirs are not. Authority derived from office, credential, or celebrity does not impress them. Architects are interested only in what make sense, and thus only statements that are consistent and coherent carry any weight with them.

Architects often seem difficult to know. They are inclined to be shy except with close friends, and their reserve is difficult to penetrate. Able to concentrate better than any other type, they prefer to work quietly at their computers or drafting tables, and often alone. Architects also become obsessed with analysis, and this can seem to shut others out. Once caught up in a thought process, Architects close off and persevere until they comprehend the issue in all its complexity. Architects prize intelligence, and with their grand desire to grasp the structure of the universe, they can seem arrogant and may show impatience with others who have less ability, or who are less driven.

Albert Einstein as the iconic Rational is an Architect

Dr. David Keirsey, Robert Rosen, George Soros, Gregory Peck, James Madison, Ludwig Boltzman, Charles Darwin, Adam Smith, and Thomas Jefferson" /> are examples of the Architect Rationals

Yep, thats me alright. I also have a job in the field recommended by the site and I couldn't be happier.
 
ENTP... I/E is very very weakly on the E side, though... the N and P parts are really strong, T fairly strong... but E *barely* overriding I. Not from the linked test, but I've done it many times before.
 
There was a thread/poll here a year or two ago about this. The results were overwhelmingly INTJ.

That's what I was when I took it, about to take it again...

edit -

Your Type is INTJ

Introverted 78%
Intuitive 50%
Thinking 38 %
Judging 33%
 
Last edited:
Back
Top