Was not impressed with him prior. Another overhyped personality cult dude was my impression from those here who talked him up. I ain't a big Lew Rockwell/Mises Institute fan either. They are simply reading material I can glean basic data from and toss the opinions..like i do with everything else i read from any source. Can't stand Schiff or Stossel either. Talking heads are not my cup of tea. I don't need telling what to think or have a ditto dude i can listen to to back up my internal thought processes. And probably it is due more to people being sycophants about these people that turn me off. Just like Just Bieber hype or Lady gaga.
Rev9
I'll be serious for a sec.
My stance is as follows: People have every right to gripe about pricing etc, but no right to the product. Pretty simple?
Why aren't they allowed to complain, I could see if someone threatened harm to Mr. Woods that this would be a tort and direction violation of our principles but merely posting random internet comments should be permissible?
I think Tom makes a good, but unfair point. Many in the movement do a great deal pro bono, and they are important to the cause as well. I would have preferred if Tom drew that distinction in his vlog. I certainly hope he agrees with me on that point. I have donated over my annual salary to liberty causes over the years, I do know what he is talking about to some degree, so as long as there is some benefit of doubt to be given, Tom does get that very benefit of the doubt from me.
His video was awkward. Event organizers certainly need to be cost conscious, as it can get out of hand fast. How much is reasonable? That is purely subjective. To some, charging a penny to preach to the choir is too much. For others, what is seen as a reasonable fee can vary greatly. Tom's idea that a "chip-in" could be created for the fees of a given speaker would be problematic. Any controversy he has seen about fees to this point would be multiplied many times if it was put out to a "chip-in" vote.
This is always an issue for a campaign like this. If you are a true believer and are lucky enough to be in a position to charge for your services, how much do you charge? Many feel that pro-bono is their contribution. How much would you be comfortable charging? It might be much easier to work for a candidate or cause that you don't really beleive in, therefore there would be no considerations other than time and money.
Quite the sticky wicket.
Way too much thinking. Everyone should charge whatever they want, and everyone should offer to pay whatever they want.
If you are a professional, how much would charge the Ron Paul campaign if you worked for them? Would you charge an industry standard rate? Would you give a discount because you believe in the cause? Would you charge more than you have ever made before in you life because you felt you were doing something more important than before? Some people face these very questions. Woods seems to be jumping into the middle of these common controversies.
Each situation is different and each person probably will consider the context of his decision to charge what he thinks is the best price according to his objectives.
I do think that getting mad at angry anonymous internet posters and making a video about it is a waste of time.
The additional complication seems to be that these negotiations somehow became public, and people then gave their always helpful "input".![]()
Do you mind if I make you my personal talking head? Your opinions are far more intriguing than whats normally found on the interwebs :dWas not impressed with him prior. Another overhyped personality cult dude was my impression from those here who talked him up. I ain't a big Lew Rockwell/Mises Institute fan either. They are simply reading material I can glean basic data from and toss the opinions..like i do with everything else i read from any source. Can't stand Schiff or Stossel either. Talking heads are not my cup of tea. I don't need telling what to think or have a ditto dude i can listen to to back up my internal thought processes. And probably it is due more to people being sycophants about these people that turn me off. Just like Just Bieber hype or Lady gaga.
Rev9
The grassroots doesn't ask for pay. So, who is part of the grassroots and who is not? Maybe Napolitano is not part of the grassroots. It seems if a million people are working for liberty for free and donating gobs of money, maybe Napolitano should join in and speak for no fee. Did MLK have "speaking fees?"
Supply and Demand. We claim to understand economics in this movement, it's about time we apply the same rules. Everyone is welcome to fill Judge Nap's shoes.
Who do you like, Rev?
Do you mind if I make you my personal talking head? Your opinions are far more intriguing than whats normally found on the interwebs :d
The grassroots doesn't ask for pay. So, who is part of the grassroots and who is not? Maybe Napolitano is not part of the grassroots. It seems if a million people are working for liberty for free and donating gobs of money, maybe Napolitano should join in and speak for no fee. Did MLK have "speaking fees?"
That was somewhat obnoxious, and I'm no moocher.
Besides a few people, I don't see anyone complaining about cost. Seriously, the cost is nearly nothing for what is being offered. Any extras go toward electing liberty candidates.
Instead, they're whining that 1/20 of the event might be taken up by someone they disagree with. I'm not sure how those people live in a world where they encounter people every day, who don't 100% agree with them. Wtf? I spent 6 years convincing my own father that Paul was right instead of this "protecting our interests around the world" bullshit. And for perspective, he was a Goldwater guy.
"Where is the money going?" is a legitimate question, but at least around here, I don't see a lot of people saying it should be free. $77 for 3 days of stuff is almost free anyway. If anythone thinks they can come down to Tampa and not spend double or triple that over 3 days, you're delusional.
I may have to rethink Tom Woods.
Rev9