The Pentagon's Missing Trillion Dollars

Matt Collins

Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2007
Messages
47,707
The Lighthouse - Volume 12, Issue 39 - September 27, 2010



The Pentagon's Missing Trillion Dollars

MyGovCost.org allows you to estimate not only your lifetime federal tax liability, but also your share of the tax liabilities for twenty specific spending categories, including foreign aid, welfare, and national defense. Defense spending is especially mysterious to most Americans--and understandably so. It is the least transparent component of the budget, and questioning its size and composition invites the spurious charge that one is "soft on defense"--a label that few politicians wish to acquire, no matter how plagued the defense budget is with waste, fraud, and abuse.

In his latest op-ed, defense budget expert and Independent Institute Research Fellow Winslow T. Wheeler notes a trillion-dollar anomaly in defense spending: from 1998 to 2010 Congress added $1.031 trillion to "base" (non-war) Pentagon spending, yet during that time, the Navy and Air Force shrank, whereas the Army grew by only 7 percent. That's right. The Navy saw a reduction of 46 ships, the Air Force (along with the Air Force Reserve and the Air National Guard) saw a decline of 36 squadrons, and the Army saw three additional brigade combat team equivalents--an increase of about 7 percent.

What did the Pentagon do with the extra trillion dollars? It didn't spend that money on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq--spending for those $1.113 trillion campaigns is not considered "base" spending. It didn't spend the bulk of the trillion dollar "base" increase on the Army's small expansion (although, at a price tag of about $150 billion, that expansion represented a staggering 55 percent increase in non-war forces). And it didn't spend that money mostly on new, high tech equipment: most of our military hardware inventory has grown older, according to Wheeler and the Congressional Budget Office.

"The Surge in Defense Spending," by Winslow T. Wheeler (9/18/10)

Congress, the Defense Budget, and Pork: A Snout-to-Tail Description of Congress' Foremost Concern in National Security Legislation, by Winslow T. Wheeler

MyGovCost.org

MyGovCost Facebook Page

MyGovCost Twitter Page

SOURCE:
http://www.independent.org/
 
Well, you see, there's this top secret project going on deep within Cheyenne Mountain:

images




And they're using it to talk with aliens and ETs from all over the galaxy....

stargate-sg-tapping60.jpg


But now that you know, the Men in Black will be coming to shut you up!!


:)
 
What percentage increase is that? How does it compare to the rate of inflation (both CPI and in gold)?
 
I might even be "ok" if we had all that money going to some hugely secretive, well-motivated, program. But most likely this money was filtered out to all the black ops groups and organizations that are both actively researching and deploying new methods to control and kill us.

Sigh.
 
The Lighthouse - Volume 12, Issue 39 - September 27, 2010



The Pentagon's Missing Trillion Dollars

MyGovCost.org allows you to estimate not only your lifetime federal tax liability, but also your share of the tax liabilities for twenty specific spending categories, including foreign aid, welfare, and national defense. Defense spending is especially mysterious to most Americans--and understandably so. It is the least transparent component of the budget, and questioning its size and composition invites the spurious charge that one is "soft on defense"--a label that few politicians wish to acquire, no matter how plagued the defense budget is with waste, fraud, and abuse.

In his latest op-ed, defense budget expert and Independent Institute Research Fellow Winslow T. Wheeler notes a trillion-dollar anomaly in defense spending: from 1998 to 2010 Congress added $1.031 trillion to "base" (non-war) Pentagon spending, yet during that time, the Navy and Air Force shrank, whereas the Army grew by only 7 percent. That's right. The Navy saw a reduction of 46 ships, the Air Force (along with the Air Force Reserve and the Air National Guard) saw a decline of 36 squadrons, and the Army saw three additional brigade combat team equivalents--an increase of about 7 percent.

What did the Pentagon do with the extra trillion dollars? It didn't spend that money on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq--spending for those $1.113 trillion campaigns is not considered "base" spending. It didn't spend the bulk of the trillion dollar "base" increase on the Army's small expansion (although, at a price tag of about $150 billion, that expansion represented a staggering 55 percent increase in non-war forces). And it didn't spend that money mostly on new, high tech equipment: most of our military hardware inventory has grown older, according to Wheeler and the Congressional Budget Office.

"The Surge in Defense Spending," by Winslow T. Wheeler (9/18/10)

Congress, the Defense Budget, and Pork: A Snout-to-Tail Description of Congress' Foremost Concern in National Security Legislation, by Winslow T. Wheeler

MyGovCost.org

MyGovCost Facebook Page

MyGovCost Twitter Page

SOURCE:
http://www.independent.org/

there's more missing than that! on Monday, September 10, 2001, Sec of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to announce that there was $2.3 trillion missing at the Pentagon. nothing funny about this, government press conferences like this are usually held on Fridays to get the weekend buffer yet this one happened on a Monday.


YouTube - 9/10/2001: Rumsfeld says $2.3 TRILLION Missing from Pentagon
 
Last edited:
For some perspective, we could make one thousand people in this county billionaires or 1 million people millionaires, if we just gave the money away. Maybe the best way to look at it is if you take a city with 1 million people and made them pay 1 trillion, you'd have to take 1 million each from them. Or, if you take a city like L.A. and made them pay for it, you'd have to take $250,000 from every person. So basically, for every trillion they spend, they decimate the equivalent of an entire major city's average individual net worth.
 
A person could spend a million dollars a day since Jesus was born and still not have spent 1 trillion dollars.

I read that somewhere.. true?
 
A person could spend a million dollars a day since Jesus was born and still not have spent 1 trillion dollars.

I read that somewhere.. true?

Yes , you would only be spending about a billion every three years .
 
Back
Top