THE OFFICIAL (Non-Collins) Elizabeth Warren Stupidity thread!

Before you get smashed and accused of racism, while I feel you didn't say things correctly, your ideas are somewhat right. I don't think we should play "throw me a cookie" politics like the Dems did to get Obama elected. Propping up a minority or a woman just for the sake of doing so doesn't do anything.
THen how do we win this damn thing? There are no more 1950s white people around. Race is our national obsession.
 
Any state that would consider a Mitt Romney as a Republican is a state whose Democratic Party we would expect to produce nothing less.
Whats worse is that the massholes are coming to New Hampshire. Screw them. They are the reason why NH now has a seatbelt law.
 
THen how do we win this damn thing?

Run Rand in 2016. He can deliver the message in a way that appeals to everyone. Maybe we can put a minority up as VP if we were to win the nomination. Look, I live in Ohio and Obama threw a giant fricken bone to organized labor about the auto bailout. He carried Ohio by less than 2% and that probably made the difference for him. Our positions need to appeal to all demographics and Ron was effective with that in the primary.
 
Fuck Minorities. Better yet Fuck the liberal racism and splitting put on by leftists. I hate rubio for this reason, he was elected on perverse racial incentives. We should look to ourselves as 1 american. I am starting to think white people need to become 90% of the population again.

Let me get this straight say fuck minorities they use the system for their own benefit? If remember correctly white are still the majority of the population and thus can elect whomever they want to elect (only requires that they get informed and vote for the right candidate). Anyway, I still see that many people just dont understand the problem, its not necessarily what race is voting but what the person voting has at steak? If you continue to have people with no skin in the game vote for things from people with skin in the game, the system will always end up at the point. Its only a matter of time.

Personally, I dont want anybody who doesn't pay any taxes, serve in the military or contribute in some major way vote in any election that will elect someone who can raise taxes or send people to war. Until this problem is fixed and or elected officials start following the constitution, you can whine till the cows come home and the system will still be fucked up.
 
The reason for more midterm confidence is that Obama's coalition doesn't show up for midterms. We have run up impressive wins in most of the states (governors mansions and legislatures), as well as House and Senate.

Too bad about the 17th Amendment, eh?
 
Ugh, this woman makes me want to puke.

I apologize to everyone on behalf of massachusetts. I tried to talk as many people to not voting for her as possible.

She is the pure hyper-progressive personified.

"You didn't build that", "social justice", "green jobs", "fair share", "social contract", "more regulation", "consumer advocate", "fair trade", "new new deal", "healthcare is a right", "equal pay", "stimulus", "gov funded abortions = right" etc etc

lolz ... Certainly I do not blame you Matt. No need to apologize. Obama won re-election for crying out loud. "The proper role of government is to put people on kill lists."

And then execute them with "two words." Predator Drones.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iQnK6bY79o
 
Last edited:
Whats worse is that the massholes are coming to New Hampshire. Screw them. They are the reason why NH now has a seatbelt law.


We don't have an adult seatbelt law here. Yet.

That's what I actually came in here to add: if you guys think Warren is bad you should start paying attention to the new NH winners, especially the loony Carol Shea Porter. I guarantee some excellent yuks in here the next 2 years.
 
Cut Pocahontas a break. She's only 4 or 5 generations from dying wool and picking berries and shit.
 
I heard that Gerrymandering is why republicans are wiing. What if the tea party dies and the liberty candidates are considered extremeists?
 
We will keep the Tea Party alive. Honestly the Tea Party is more about fiscal conservatism so if any of these establishment hacks sell out to tax hikes we will be in good position. Also something that has flown under the radar: the Republicans are doing INCREDIBLY well at the state level elections. Ohio has a 59-40 R advantage in the State House and a near 2:1 ratio of Senators for example.
 
Kerry will be appointed sect of state, and Scott Brown will run in the special election, and win again.
 
Run Rand in 2016. He can deliver the message in a way that appeals to everyone. Maybe we can put a minority up as VP if we were to win the nomination. Look, I live in Ohio and Obama threw a giant fricken bone to organized labor about the auto bailout. He carried Ohio by less than 2% and that probably made the difference for him. Our positions need to appeal to all demographics and Ron was effective with that in the primary.

We will keep the Tea Party alive. Honestly the Tea Party is more about fiscal conservatism so if any of these establishment hacks sell out to tax hikes we will be in good position. Also something that has flown under the radar: the Republicans are doing INCREDIBLY well at the state level elections. Ohio has a 59-40 R advantage in the State House and a near 2:1 ratio of Senators for example.

What is the stupid media keep focusing the battle on Abortion and Gay marriage instead of austrian economics. I don't want a fuck like Rachel Maddow to be on her stupid righteous soapbox.
 
It's only when our dumbass candidates bring it up, like Akin and Mourdock. Those were 2 seats that we would have had in the bag and been Rand-friendly otherwise. The left doesn't want to push economics. They know it's a losing issue for them. They want social issues at the forefront. With a libertarian like Rand, that front goes away. Plus Rand is a physician, so you know they wouldn't be able to pull out the anti-science BS.
 
We're setting ourselves up for a great next 4 years.

Uh... no.

Abdulrahman.jpg
 
"The agenda of the Republican Party is to limit access to health care services. It's to deny women equal pay for equal work. It's to cut funding for Planned Parenthood." - Elizabeth Warren.

This whole quote is ridiculous, but the equal pay part stands out as the most ridiculous. It would require some kind of quiet secret agenda by the Republicans to accomplish this since you can't exactly put that in as a plank. You can't come right out and say you disagree with competent women being paid as much as competent men in the workplace, and thankfully I don't know anybody who would actually try to defend something that draconian if you did. "All those in favor of women's federal salaries being reduced by 25% say aye, all those opposed say nay......In the opinion of the chair the ayes have it...." You've got to be joking. Even Boehner reading that decision from a teleprompter would know something isn't right. Where are these people bred?

If you want eqaul pay, get equal results, otherwise shut up. Even then its the emploeyers job to determine pay. I guess acccording to her we need government permission to give someone a raise.
 
It's only when our dumbass candidates bring it up, like Akin and Mourdock. Those were 2 seats that we would have had in the bag and been Rand-friendly otherwise. The left doesn't want to push economics. They know it's a losing issue for them. They want social issues at the forefront. With a libertarian like Rand, that front goes away. Plus Rand is a physician, so you know they wouldn't be able to pull out the anti-science BS.

Akin and Mourdock were actually pretty cool people. And mourdock's statement was out of context. If you listened to the full thing it is very admirable.

You'd be surprised how many academic doctors harp on simple country psychiatrists.
 
I'm sorry pochy but Mourdock using the R word i.e RAPE is fucking nuts after Akin, shut up about abortion everything out of his mouth should ha e been about jobs, jobs, jobs, the economy, lower taxes even if he's asked a direct question about abortion, change the subject to the economy. no one wants to hear about abortions and rape.

If he's not savvy enough to do that then frankly he deserved to lose and so did Akin
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry pochy but Mourdock using the R word i.e RAPE is fucking nuts after Akin, shut up about abortion everything out of his mouth should ha e been about jobs, jobs, jobs, the economy, lower taxes even if he's asked a direct question about abortion, change the subject to the economy. no one wants to hear about abortions and rape.

If he's not savvy enough to do that then frankly he deserved to lose and so did Akin

If people did not take it our of fucking context, maybe they won't be so damn judgemental. Also, i agree with you.
 
Back
Top