Tarzan
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 1,736
Guys I think Ron Paul knows something may be going down.
I don't understand your post... could you elaborate?
Guys I think Ron Paul knows something may be going down.
It had nothing to do with the campaign screwing up. They did way better than they were supposed to.
We just will never win spread out in tiny little pockets. We have no credibility that way and it's tiring to be one of only a few. We need to unite together in one place where we'll actually have some leverage. That's the only answer.
The official campaign has been a disaster.
Advertising, press relations, volunteer coordination and education - all bush league.
Nonetheless Ron Paul is the one who brought us all together with his message of Peace, Freedom, Liberty, and Prosperity. Ron Paul's message brought in Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, Independents and the apathetic.
Using this board as a gauge, purely from my subjective view, it seems like its mostly only those dedicated to Republican party who remain active at this point.
There must be a catalyst to keep the disparate group of supporters together - and simply promoting taking back the Republican party just is not going to do it. If Ron Paul just goes back to being a congressman I am sorry to say it is all over - we become a footnote.
I was hoping that Ron Paul would run as an Independent, as I saw that as probably the only way that this movement will stay together having a strong central leader promoting a unique philosophy. Otherwise, our group is destined to splinter and go the way of the Reform party.
Keeping the campaign going with a rally in DC gives the opportunity to regenerate some of the enthusiasm that surrounded the campaign last autumn and just maybe a new political structure can somehow spring forth from it.
I'm going to say something that I'm certain will piss many people off. It is, however, my honest opinion.
We need to separate this message from it's failed messenger. Yes, the Ron Paul presidential campaign has failed. If we continue to make this movement about Dr. Paul, instead of Constitutional government, we run the very definite risk of going down with the ship, so to speak. This is not to say we disown him. Far from it. I am suggesting we bow out gracefully and begin upon our next project.
I see this movement, if it perseveres, taking things local. I believe the meetup groups are perfect seeds to become a better organized, more experienced, and even larger network of liberty-minded activists. If these groups can begin to produce candidates for local and state offices, we can continue to make progress, and perhaps in the long run, have an even more dramatic effect than a presidency. I am very excited about the handful of us who have already launched campaigns for state or federal legislative positions. I believe these should be our focus now, and Ron Paul can play an important role helping them to campaign.
I am, however, less enthusiastic about the prospects for reforming the Republican party. I have to acknowledge though, that I still feel some enmity for the organization, so I will not argue the wisdom of the effort. Indeed, I have become a delegate and will be attending the Senatorial conventions. We will see then what possibilities for reform we may actually have.
Thanks for the thoughtful response.
My concern regarding these tactics is that we would only be putting off the inevitable. Third parties are not a reality in today's America and the GOP is ripe for the picking... that's why I think we should be targeting them for a takeover.
I want us to come up with a better idea than the "March on Washington"... or rally, which has no defined purpose or objective... or even a date. Even a "traveling freedom show" to go to diverse cities for education and unity efforts might work better... or something else. Whether it is DC or St. Paul we will achieve no real objectives for the short or long term. I think we would be spending our last energy on a "feel good" event... I want more.
We also need to take this out of the hands of the current leaders... the campaign staffers. We need to involved board to oversee actions carried out by a professional group with a proven history of success.
You have obviously given this some thought... I know you are a US expat so you may be in a unique position to "see the forest from the trees"... please consider where we are and where we are going to share any ideas you may have.
We need help here to keep this movement together and give ourselves the best chance of winning the Revolution.
good luck to us all
no it isn't. centralization sucks.
I don't understand your post... could you elaborate?
It had nothing to do with the campaign screwing up. They did way better than they were supposed to.
What? The official campaign did "better than they were supposed to"? What does that mean? What happened to the give us $12 million and we'll WIN Iowa and New Hampshire?
It doesn't come down to mistakes. It comes down to the fact that America does not agree with us because they have never seen what freedom looks like. We need a change of strategy. We need to unite to join our efforts in one place, make it free and show them what freedom looks like.
Personally I think Ron Paul knows of things that he does not share with the public, perhaps including his campaign staff.
Obviously all I can do is speculate, but I've often wondered why the campaign didn't re-tool back in May/June when it was obvious they were becoming far more popular than they ever anticipated.
My best guess (and I do mean guess) is that Ron Paul never intended to win the nomination, he has essentially come out and said as much on more than one occasion.
Why would he not do everything in his power to win? There could be several reasons of course and I have no inside knowledge.
But the most obvious reason is that, in order for our Country to be restored to something resembling it's Constitutional roots, it will take far more of an effort than just electing a President who wishes to do so.
Not only would Ron Paul as President have the entire establishment against him, the Congress, the Courts, most of the bueracracy of the Executive, the Media, and the wealthy elite against him, he would also be a very easy target for the type of action which has taken place in the past against Presidents who had the audacity to actually try and lead the Country away from collectivism and back towards individualism.
And even if the ultimate sacrifice wasn't necessary for him to make, it is almost a forgone conclusion now that the economy will collapse within the next year or two.
Were that to happen on Ron Paul's watch then his message and his policies, which would in no way be responsible for the problems he would have inherited, would nevertheless take the blame for the calamity that our Nation will be facing.
And that would set back the freedom cause far far worse than merely having him defeated in the Republican nomination.
But now he has awakened many 10's of thousands of us, and he will remain in Congress to serve as the focal point and leader for our movement so we can start getting him allies elected in Congress and in Local and State Government positions.
I admit that last July/August I was much more naive than I am now and was expecting a much greater showing in Iowa and New Hampshire than we had. Personally I have little doubt that the integrity of our voting process is severely compromised and that there was outright fraud that kept Ron Paul's momentum from growing.
But as to why Ron Paul himself seems to have taken a passive role in this campaign, well I think he knows that in order for the rEVOLution to last past his career and to have any chance of actually retaking control of the Government from the collectivist, that it will need much more depth and seasoning that can be provided by a 1 year presidential campaign.
The real job begins after the primary. Now is when the grassroots needs to dig into the establishment and retake control of local Republican Party organizations, re-write the platforms, learn how to play the game, and start getting individualists into positions of power. Then in 2010 we can elect more of our politicians, start moving them into the fray, and further consolidate our gains.
Hopefully by then or shortly after a charismatic individualist will arise who can make a serious run for the Republican nomination, who has a commanding presence, a great oratory style, who looks good on TV, who has a sense of humor, but who will not sell out our principles for their own power.
And Ron Paul will be there in Congress to provide the inside information, the guidance, the experience, and the wisdom to make him win.
So there is no giving up if you are serious about liberty, about freedom, about what the USA is supposed to stand for, and about our future.
Shake off your stupor, dump your doubts, nix your negativity, and get back to work.
We need you. Don't fail us.
Some of you feel that presidential campaign is over and we need to refocus our goals and I want to offer this food for thought:
By pushing all delegates we can to both national and states' conventions, we are actually accomplishing the goals of getting like-minded candidates elected and making 3rd party runs more feasible.
See, if we push delegates, we can then pack the rules committee, credentials committee, and leadership within the party both at national and state levels with our people, and therefore make the whole party more friendly toward liberty candidates.
This is why Ron Paul wants us to be delegates; it is truly up to us to take over the party and pave the way.
Some say that the system is rigged against us and therefore we should work outside the system. But the system *IS* the problem and we already know how viable 3rd/Indy runs are. It's simply that- up to us to take back that system by packing all committees and delegates.
For those thinking that 3rd party will be more friendly, I already mentioned that if CP and LP members became Republicans, the process would be a easy slam dunk. We don't need to split; we need to unite and guess what? Ron Paul's message is something we can all unite, regardless of our personal beliefs! Also, that sort of coalition is quite common in European parliaments; we would do well to learn by their example and consolidate for strength.
Now, for independent run, I'm afraid I'm a bit stumped on that- I'm simply not sure whether it is possible for Ron Paul to run as independent without losing all privileges of being a Republican and his seat. If that isn't the case, then I would agree that having his name on ballot as Independent would be a handy bargaining chip come the convention. We will need to find that rule...
Bottom line: None of those goals are mutually exclusive, but by achieving the goal of becoming delegates for Ron Paul, we make all other goals much, much easier than if we said, "Screw it. I'm not going to work in the system and will do it my way!"
It just blows me away how ANYONE who paid attention to the Ron Paul movement over the past year could possibly come to that conclusion!It had nothing to do with the campaign screwing up. They did way better than they were supposed to.
Yes in within a couple months hundreds of VOLUNTEERS had created incredibly informative and marketable websites, commercials, databases, print advertisements etc. WITHOUT 10 million dollars!Considering where this campaign started (I mean, in th beginning, his website looked like something from 1995)