The Official Alt Right Thread

The alt right supports a white ethno state, I support immigration reduction from non whites countries but I oppose a white ethno state!
Om Economics the alt right is even worse...Richard Spencer supports single payer healthcare & the Green new deal.


Why do you oppose Whites having states for themselves?

Yeah, they are wrong are a few things but what we get right we get right. Spencer is wrong on healthcare, econ but when you are a white who is outnumbere dby default everything will go to shit, Visa vi South Africa.
 
Why do you oppose Whites having states for themselves?

Yeah, they are wrong are a few things but what we get right we get right. Spencer is wrong on healthcare, econ but when you are a white who is outnumbere dby default everything will go to $#@!, Visa vi South Africa.
Culture is what is important and since it tends to correlate with race/ethnicity and is the end product you care about if there is a significant racial influence on it then you don't need to worry about race/ethnicity.
 
Why do you oppose Whites having states for themselves?

Yeah, they are wrong are a few things but what we get right we get right. Spencer is wrong on healthcare, econ but when you are a white who is outnumbere dby default everything will go to shit, Visa vi South Africa.

Hey Whiz-Kid....

Have you looked at ethnic demographics?

Here's governments take with a pretty picture;


https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/charts-of-note/?topicId=14909
Percent_of_rural_urban_populations_350px.png


Tuesday, May 14, 2019
Rural America is less racially and ethnically diverse than the Nation’s urban areas. In 2017, Whites accounted for nearly 80 percent of the rural population (compared to 58 percent in urban areas). While Hispanics were the fastest-growing segment of the rural population, they account for only 9 percent of the rural population (20 percent in urban areas). Blacks made up 8 percent of the rural population (13 percent in urban areas). American Indians were the only minority group with a higher rural (2 percent) than urban share (0.5 percent). Relatively few Asians and Pacific Islanders (included in the “Other” category) were rural residents, with these groups accounting for 1 and 0.1 percent of the rural population, respectively. The rest of the “Other” category reported multiple races and accounted for 1.8 percent of the rural population. This chart appears in the November 2018 ERS report, Rural America at a Glance, 2018 Edition.
 
...How so?
If race/ethnicity has a significant effect then it will show up in a nations culture and if you exclude people from that culture/nation you will exclude that race/ethnicity without having to target them based on race/ethnicity, if race/ethnicity has no significant effect then you will still not allow immigration from anti-liberty cultures and you won't have created the assumption that white communists etc. are acceptable because of their race/ethnicity.
 
If race/ethnicity has a significant effect then it will show up in a nations culture and if you exclude people from that culture/nation you will exclude that race/ethnicity without having to target them based on race/ethnicity, if race/ethnicity has no significant effect then you will still not allow immigration from anti-liberty cultures and you won't have created the assumption that white communists etc. are acceptable because of their race/ethnicity.

Well yeah, that goes without saying.
 
How is it an "elitist nightmare" to have a nation for your own people, we had this between 1790-1954 and it worked out great for us.

"My"Own People?

I don't own people..

and the State defines me as White.. I reject their definition.

And I certainly don't want a bunch of you.

image.jpg
 
"My"Own People?

I don't own people..

and the State defines me as White.. I reject their definition.

And I certainly don't want a bunch of you.

image.jpg

Illinois NAZIs: people who are NAZIs, whose pensions are also deeply underfunded
 
"My"Own People?

I don't own people..

and the State defines me as White.. I reject their definition.

And I certainly don't want a bunch of you.

image.jpg


Well if you want to play Mr Atomized you can do so all by yourself.

Well i hope you love live among hordes of 3rd world welfare voters, I bet they will respect your property rights.
 
Well if you want to play Mr Atomized you can do so all by yourself.

Ah, the chestnut about how libertarians are 'atomic individuals,' reject society, etc (i.e. complete nonsense).

Isn't "the right stuff" coming out with any new themes; must you recycle the same old material?
 
Ah, the chestnut about how libertarians are 'atomic individuals,' reject society, etc (i.e. complete nonsense).

Isn't "the right stuff" coming out with any new themes; must you recycle the same old material?

No, it is, you people are largely just spregs who do nothing but reject anything that shows you to be wrong, your self defeating world view never does get off the ground people of people like you and if it does its only thinks to people like Stefan Molyneux, Hoppe, who understand basic cause and effect and based their world view on facts rather then against them...
 
I didn't read the rest of your post.

This term, "spregs," you pepper that into many of your comments.

From which "alternative media" venue did you learn this word?

That is, whom are you parroting?

If you read the term, you fit that profile to a tee...Not my fault you are a spreg, spreg.

The idea that just because you repeat the same handful of lines, therefore everyone else has to be really does show that your projection has gotten worse. Just because you are an NPC does not mean everyone else is...
 
I didn't read the rest of your post.

This term, "spregs," you pepper that into many of your comments.

From which "alternative media" venue did you learn this word?

That is, whom are you parroting?

Was wondering the same and searched for this made up derogation.

Super secret Q Speek no doubt.
 
Back
Top