The NAP

What about the duty of the strong to protect the weak?

People on this forum use it as the justification for the state to ban abortion, yet many of the same support RP when he refuses to even vote in favour of motions condemning genocide, let alone do they advocate intervention?
 
NationaliseIt said:
What about the duty of the strong to protect the weak?

People on this forum use it as the justification for the state to ban abortion, yet many of the same support RP when he refuses to even vote in favour of motions condemning genocide, let alone do they advocate intervention?
Click to expand...
The NAP is for you to decide for you, individually and PERSONALLY. Unfortunately the babies don't have nor get the option to choose. I guess we know how their moms decided on the NAP. :(
 
NationaliseIt said:
What about the duty of the strong to protect the weak?
Click to expand...
That's why the Constitution and our Republic needs to be reinstated. Our form of government was established to protect the minority, or the one, against the force of the majority.

People on this forum use it as the justification for the state to ban abortion, yet many of the same support RP when he refuses to even vote in favour of motions condemning genocide, let alone do they advocate intervention?
Click to expand...

You're mixing apples and oranges here, I'm afraid. I can only speak for myself, so let me tell you my viewpoint. Abortion is murder, at least in my eyes. As far as genocide is concerned, I would imagine he voted against it because we cannot dictate to other sovereign nations. We need to mind our own business. However, individual Americans should be free to help in any way they personally choose.

Intervening in other countries' affairs, overthrowing their governments and installing the puppet of our choice, is what has led to the U.S. being hated around the world; not to mention costing money that we do not have to spend. We are not the policeman of the world; nor should we be. Our Founders told us to be well-wishers to all and to serve as example.
 
LibertyEagle said:
You're mixing apples and oranges here, I'm afraid. I can only speak for myself, so let me tell you my viewpoint. Abortion is murder, at least in my eyes. As far as genocide is concerned, I would imagine he voted against it because we cannot dictate to other sovereign nations. We need to mind our own business. However, individual Americans should be free to help in any way they personally choose.
Click to expand...
If abortion is murder then you cannot deny that genocide is murder.

Why does a mother aborting her unwanted pregnancy your business to get involved in? yet tens of thousands being systematically slaughtered will just get a head turned the other way?

Intervening in other countries' affairs, overthrowing their governments and installing the puppet of our choice, is what has led to the U.S. being hated around the world; not to mention costing money that we do not have to spend. We are not the policeman of the world; nor should we be. Our Founders told us to be well-wishers to all and to serve as example.
Click to expand...
Many US interventions were despicable, but by stopping genocides and protecting the weak, is that not providing a good example?
 
The Consequences of Roe v. Wade​

49,551,703​

Total Abortions since 1973​

Looks like a genocide of the innocent defenseless unborn to me. :( :mad:
 
Last edited:
So why do you (and others on this forum) only care (and wish to politically intervene) about the unborn?

Do people stop mattering the second they push through a vagina?
 
NationaliseIt said:
So why do you (and others on this forum) only care (and wish to politically intervene) about the unborn?

Do people stop mattering the second they push through a vagina?
Click to expand...
I only speak for myself, NOT for ANYONE else. I don't.

Read the OP again, please. ;)

Thanks! :)
 
What's with the bored trolls today? (NationaliseIt and RightisRight)
 
Zolah said:
What's with the bored trolls today? (NationaliseIt and RightisRight)
Click to expand...

Same as every day, I suppose. :rolleyes::p The trolls may be back in school for the time being, but they still don't have enough homework to occupy them away from RPFs. :(:mad::p
 
Then do you have a suggestion for stopping genocide beyond the old tired "bury our head in the sand" approach that most here follow?

You talk about natural rights and liberty, but who is to enforce it in the name of those too weak to protect themselves? The majority of the citizens of the world didn't grow up on a farm in good 'ol texas being given the skills to provide and protect themselves.
 
Last edited:
NationaliseIt said:
Then do you have a suggestion for stopping genocide beyond the old tired "bury our head in the sand" approach that most here follow?

I'm a consistent supporter of "PREVENT UNWANTED PREGNANCIES", it's the grown up thing to do.

You talk about natural rights and liberty, but who is to enforce it in the name of those too weak to protect themselves? The majority of the citizens of the world didn't grow up on a farm in good 'ol texas being given the skills to provide and protect themselves.

Well first we stop the AGGRESSION and then see where we are. Which brings us back to the NAP. A free society is created one by one.
Click to expand...

:)
 
Doesn't answer with how a libertarian society would deal with say Burma?

Ron Paul wont even vote to condemn genocidal actions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Occam's Banana
US senator says rights come from the government
Replies
4
Views
104
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
PAF
The Right to be Left Alone
Replies
1
Views
26
acptulsa
acptulsa
osan
Dump The NAP And Greet The NTP
Replies
2
Views
361
osan
osan
PAF
Masters of Our Fate, Captains of Our Souls
Replies
0
Views
88
PAF
PAF
PAF
The First Cause of Modern War is the Modern State
Replies
0
Views
84
PAF
PAF
Back
Top