The Myth of Police Protection

[KCIndy]

I ask because one of their goals are to break-up our local police forces by reducing trust between police and the community, reducing the competency of police, dumb-down police training, under-fund police departments, and to highlight stories like this in the media.
.

Who are you talking about???

 

[Vessol]

I love the google ads for this thread, all criminal defense attorney ads.

 

[CCTelander]

Do you recall where this story was originally posted?

I ask because one of their goals are to break-up our local police forces by reducing trust between police and the community, reducing the competency of police, dumb-down police training, under-fund police departments, and to highlight stories like this in the media.

So, while this is clearly an egregious act and total incompetence by the police, and a telling decision by the courts, I'm still left wondering if there is more to understand here.

Sorry IP, I missed this post the first time through.

I first read about it while doing legal research into constitutional issues back in the mid- to late 1980s. Here's the correct cite:

Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1, 4 (D.C. 1981)

You can easily look it up at any university law library, assuming they'll let you use it. Back in those days we had to fight tooth and nail for the "privillege" of using law libraries that our tax dollars paid for. I have to assume it would be even worse now, though I haven't done any of that kind of research in quite a few years.

If you have a West Law or Lexis subscription it's available online, but those are prohibitively expensive.

I'd suggest getting the book Dial 911 and Die from JPFO or Amazon. You may not fully trust groups like JPFO, but every citation in the book is pretty easily verifiable, so long as you can get access to a decent law library.

As far as brearking up local police forces, great idea! Get rid of all of them and replace them with private security firms. Professional government police forces were never intended to "fight crime" or protect individual rights anyway. Their primary purpose has always been to keep certain segments of society under control (mostly any segment that criticizes government). A little research into their history demonstrates this quite clearly.

They're tax parasites. Government paid thugs there to make sure individuals don't somehow get the crazy idea that they're actually the sovereigns. We don't need them. We got by quite well for close to a century without them. When they finally go, good riddance.

 

[CCTelander]

I love the google ads for this thread, all criminal defense attorney ads.

That's hilarious.

 

[Kalashnikov Josh]

What I find appalling,is that even tho the government has made it clear they have no obligation to protect the people via the police mechanism,they still insist on 'gun control'......and victimizing people who dare defend themselves with the 'justice system'.

So where does a setup like that leave us?

easy.

set up.

 

[CCTelander]

What I find appalling,is that even tho the government has made it clear they have no obligation to protect the people via the police mechanism,they still insist on 'gun control'......and victimizing people who dare defend themselves with the 'justice system'.

So where does a setup like that leave us?

easy.

set up.

Sadly, that's all too true.

 

[CCTelander]

bump

 

[Travlyr]

Appreciate the bump.

Everything was fine in my world, until I read this. What good are they to us if they aren't going to protect us? Oh, yeah... the money/jobs thing.

 

[CCTelander]

Appreciate the bump.

No problem.

Everything was fine in my world, until I read this. What good are they to us if they aren't going to protect us? Oh, yeah... the money/jobs thing.

Sorry if it ruined your day man. But I always feel it's better to be aware of the situation than to go about unaware and maybe get blindsided by it some day.

 

[Matt Collins]

Rights and responsibilities are in tandem. When one gives up their responsibility to protect themselves, they will eventually lose the right to protect themselves. When one gives up the responsibility to educate their children, they will also lose their right to educate their children too.

 

[ninepointfive]

I think we need a new Folder somewhere called "Law Enforcement". There are way too many police abuses everyday and it would be great if there is a place to go to be aware of what's going on. We could also have advice from different people, like the lawyer who made that video advising not talking to the police if one doesn't have to.

"Law Enforcement" folder. What do you guys think?

+1

 

[CCTelander]

+1

Good idea.

 

[CCTelander]

bump

 

[CCTelander]

Bump for relevance to other threads.

 

[phill4paul]

Some more court cases regarding OP.

http://home.absolute.net/xode/nwofraud/obvious_fraud/protectnscam.htm

 

[ninepointfive]

bump for law enforcement forums

 

[Kregisen]

bump for law enforcement forums

I concur!

 

[low preference guy]

bump for law enforcement forums

+1!!!!!!!!!

Josh, what do you think?

 

[CCTelander]

bump

 

[osan]

I see a lot of threads regarding police and their actions lately, so I thought this information might explain a few things. At the very least, it's good to know.

This is excerpted from one of my previous posts.

Jesus... what a horror story.

The USA is SO fucked, and the worst bit is that it doesn't have to be this way.