The media has shifted in a Paulwise direction

[CJLauderdale4]

That guy makes my blood boil.

If you ever can build up the stomach to listen to Sean Insanity, you'd think there was only 3 people left in the race.
He's back to the "Denial" phase of his Neo-cons Anonymous Program - regressing methinks...

 

[Vanilluxe]

I don't like how the media is now saying Ron Paul thinks Romney will win, so he will support Romney just to spread his message.

 

[azxd]

Why not go to a unit/committee meeting yourself with a bunch of friends, and see first-hand the change you did?

I guess he talks about a shift in the media.

YES, I was referring to the media shift ... That's what I thought this thread was about.

 

[azxd]

I would say shifted into a Paulwise direction is a fallacy. However, I will say that Ron Paul being confirmed with 2nd place, forces the media to give him coverage or it would be to obvious that he's being silenced.

That's all I have seen thus far.

They learned in 08 that we are not going to go away, and we learned to call them on the obvious bias against Paul.

If they had their way, his name would never be mentioned.
The MSM is the propaganda arm of the invisible government which controls everything.

THE conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
Bernays - 1928

 

[Chainspell]

I will NEVER forgive and I will NEVER forget how f***ing corrupt the corporate media has been.

 

[green73]

The MSM are Establishment. Anytime it sounds like they are being fair you can bet it's duplicitous.

 

[Chainspell]

I dont even know what duplicitous means. I had to look it up in the dictionary! RP supporters are so smart! I need to catch up..

 

[Gray Fullbuster]

I never bought into the media "pushing a candidate."

If a candidate is in the lead in polls, or wins a state, people obviously chose that candidate.

News reports on who gets the most support of the people or who does well in debates.

Naturally, Paul getting albeit more coverage at a time like this is natural.

 

[ninepointfive]

I don't have cable tv to watch the news, but it is indeed becoming apparent that Ron is moving past Santorum and Gingrich. Those guys seem like mere placeholders to serve as a buffer between Ron Paul and Romney.

 

[MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2]

Their ownership benefits from the Status Quo. I do not believe one thing any of these news shows say anymore and wonder, was it always this way?

Yeah, same here. Before the internet, everyone had the same few news sources and I wonder if they were always so screwed up.

 

[Liberty74]

Unfortunately not according to know it all chris matthews........repeats at 7pm EST at MSNBC

Chris "My Leg Tingles" Matthew -----> The admitted anti-American "Socialist." Nah, he has no anti-human collectivist propaganda from his show.

 

[TheGrinch]

I never bought into the media "pushing a candidate."

If a candidate is in the lead in polls, or wins a state, people obviously chose that candidate.

News reports on who gets the most support of the people or who does well in debates.

Naturally, Paul getting albeit more coverage at a time like this is natural.

No, it's not when they put out nothing but hit pieces out every time he does well with blatant lies because they have no real dirt on the honest man. They haven't just changed ignoring and marginalizing him for no reason, and they're already perpetuating a Romney/Ron/Rand backdoor deal to discredit him.

I suppose you also believe that all the indications of massive voter fraud are just coincidences, and the same financial giants who own the media don't back Dr. Paul and back the other candidates on both sides of the aisle.

My apologies if you're new and not jsut trolling, but we're well past skepticism here. The establishment in this country are going to have to be dragged kicking and screaming before they let Dr. Paul get elected.

 

[Gray Fullbuster]

No, it's not when they put out nothing but hit pieces out every time he does well with blatant lies because they have no real dirt on the honest man. They haven't just changed ignoring and marginalizing him for no reason, and they're already perpetuating a Romney/Ron/Rand backdoor deal to discredit him.

I suppose you also believe that all the indications of massive voter fraud are just coincidences, and the same financial giants who own the media don't back Dr. Paul and back the other candidates on both sides of the aisle.

My apologies if you're new and not jsut trolling, but we're well past skepticism here. The establishment in this country are going to have to be dragged kicking and screaming before they let Dr. Paul get elected.

No need to go overboard there. Just said what was on my mind.

 

[Chainspell]

I never bought into the media "pushing a candidate."

If a candidate is in the lead in polls, or wins a state, people obviously chose that candidate.

News reports on who gets the most support of the people or who does well in debates.

Naturally, Paul getting albeit more coverage at a time like this is natural.

No, it's not when they put out nothing but hit pieces out every time he does well with blatant lies because they have no real dirt on the honest man. They haven't just changed ignoring and marginalizing him for no reason, and they're already perpetuating a Romney/Ron/Rand backdoor deal to discredit him.

I suppose you also believe that all the indications of massive voter fraud are just coincidences, and the same financial giants who own the media don't back Dr. Paul and back the other candidates on both sides of the aisle.

My apologies if you're new and not jsut trolling, but we're well past skepticism here. The establishment in this country are going to have to be dragged kicking and screaming before they let Dr. Paul get elected.

looks like someone still needs a little more waking up to do huh? lol

 

[Gray Fullbuster]

looks like someone still needs a little more waking up to do huh? lol

Naw. Voter fraud was rampant in Maine, NV.

NH and SC had dead people discrepancies which could be debated if fraud was involved.

Iowa I want to believe was an earnest mistake, but we were talking about the media thing. I just like I'd to defend myself on those accusations.

 

[TheGrinch]

No need to go overboard there. Just said what was on my mind.

Apologize if that was excessive, but it was more to educate you. We see everyday the way this election is being distorted. It's much easier to see when you're inside of the story (or lack thereof liek the DC soldiers march) and on the victim side of it...

I really do think the media is starting to see it backfire, hence why they're being more subtle, claiming things like a conspiracy-theory-laden "alliance" (and they try to call us kooks?) that Wead just went on record to vehemently deny and explain.

 

[wgadget]

Did you guys notice all the times during the debate that they got a pic of all of them but Paul? I guess it was convenient that they parked him on the end farthest from the moderator, eh?

 

[Tyler_Durden]

NY Times Article:
"Santorum’s Record Is Used Against Him"
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/24/u...mself-on-the-defensive.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

They mention Everybody but Paul.........Back to normal.

 

[Gray Fullbuster]

Apologize if that was excessive, but it was more to educate you. We see everyday the way this election is being distorted. It's much easier to see when you're inside of the story (or lack thereof liek the DC soldiers march) and on the victim side of it...

I really do think the media is starting to see it backfire, hence why they're being more subtle, claiming things like a conspiracy-theory-laden "alliance" (and they try to call us kooks?) that Wead just went on record to vehemently deny and explain.

Yeah, refer to my last post. Foul play is in some areas...I'm just trying to believe that in some areas it's unintentional, like media blackouts.

 

[TheGrinch]

Yeah, refer to my last post. Foul play is in some areas...I'm just trying to believe that in some areas it's unintentional, like media blackouts.

It's a lovely thought, but this is not something new with Paul. Media and politics were a large focus of my major, and the "press" as it used to be called is long since a check-and-balance fourth estate it was intended to be. It is owned by billionaires with a clear conflict of interest, when they own or make deals with the ones who own pretty much everything, and preferential treatment is given to the media outlets who follow the official narrative of the military too. The military-industrila-complex, media, and establishment are completely interest driven, and they don't like Dr. Paul because he's a threat to the control they have over things to do what they please with no check-and-balance.

They own everything and have bought all the politicians, so you absolutely cannot believe what you hear from the corporate media. The way they've treated Dr. Paul is only the most blatant example to us, but it happens every single day in the way they choose which narratives get created and what gets ignored.

Okay, now I'm going overboard, but it's all too true...