The List Of Products And Foods That Have Tested Positive For Monsanto's Carcinogenic Glyphosat

[donnay]

THE LIST OF PRODUCTS AND FOODS THAT HAVE TESTED POSITIVE FOR MONSANTO’S CARCINOGENIC GLYPHOSATE

Alex Pietrowski, Staff Writer
Waking Times

Monsanto is receiving considerable global backlash after the agrochemical and seed giant was found guilty of malice and of covering the fact that their flagship product can cause cancer.

At issue is glyphosate, the active chemical ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup and Ranger herbicides. For years, evidence has been mounting that glyphosate is carcinogenic, which is quite alarming considering that it is the most widely used (and overused) agricultural chemical ever.

“Americans have applied 1.8 million tons of glyphosate since its introduction in 1974. Worldwide, 9.4 million tons of the chemical have been sprayed onto fields. For comparison, that’s equivalent to the weight of water in more than 2,300 Olympic-size swimming pools. It’s also enough to spray nearly half a pound of Roundup on every cultivated acre of land in the world.” ~Newsweek

Glyphosate is so prevalent in our environment that trace amounts of it is now found in a wide variety of consumer products, including foods and personal hygiene products, in the human body, and in water supplies.

To some scientists and related officials, none of these products individually contain high enough levels of glyphosate to pose a health risk, however, others argue that consuming trace amounts leads to dangerous accumulations within the body, as it is known to bio-accumulate in major organs and bones.

The, “EPA’s high-end estimate of infant exposure to glyphosate exceeds the level the Agency considered safe for them in 1983.” [Newseweek]

The following list of products that have tested positive for glyphosate is quite unsettling, and the retailers who sell these products would do well for themselves to take the lead in calling for an outright ban on glyphosate.


Products and Foods Which Have Tested Positive for Glyphosate Contamination

Wheat
Breakfast Cereals & Snack Foods as tested by DetoxProject (2016)
Original Cheerios
Honey Nut Cheerios
Wheaties
Trix
Annie’s Gluten Free Bunny Cookies Cocoa & Vanilla
Kellog’s Corn Flakes
Kellog’s Raisin Bran
Kashi Organic Promise
Kellog’s Special K
Kellog’s Frosted Flakes
Cheez-It Original
Cheez-It Whole Grain
Kashi Soft Bake Cookies, Oatmeal, Dark Chocolate
Ritz Crackers
Triscuit Crackers
Oreo Original
Oreo Double Stuf Chocolate Sandwich Cookies
Oreo Double Stuf Golden Sandwich Cookies
Stacy’s Simply Naked Pita Chips (Frito-Lay)
Lay’s: Kettle Cooked Original
Doritos: Cool Ranch
Fritos (Original) (100% Whole Grain)
Goldfish crackers original (Pepperidge Farm)
Goldfish crackers colors
Goldfish crackers Whole Grain
Little Debbie Oatmeal Cream Pies
Oatmeal Cookies Gluten Free
365 Organic Golden Round Crackers
Back to Nature Crispy Cheddar Crackers
Breakfast Cereals as Tested by the Environmental Working Group (2018)
Granola
Nature’s Path Organic Honey Almond granola
Back to Nature Classic Granola
Quaker Simply Granola Oats, Honey, Raisins & Almonds
Back to Nature Banana Walnut Granola Clusters
Nature Valley Granola Protein Oats ‘n Honey
KIND Vanilla, Blueberry Clusters with Flax Seeds

Instant Oats
Giant Instant Oatmeal, Original Flavor
Simple Truth Organic Instant Oatmeal, Original
Quaker Dinosaur Eggs, Brown Sugar, Instant Oatmeal
Great Value Original Instant Oatmeal
Umpqua Oats, Maple Pecan
Market Pantry Instant Oatmeal, Strawberries & Cream
Oat Breakfast Cereal
Kashi Heart to Heart Organic Honey Toasted cereal
Cheerios Toasted Whole Grain Oat Cereal
Lucky Charms
Barbara’s Multigrain Spoonfuls, Original, Cereal
Kellogg’s Cracklin’ Oat Bran oat cereal
Snack Bar
Cascadian Farm Organic Harvest Berry, granola bar
KIND Oats & Honey with Toasted Coconut
Nature Valley Crunchy Granola Bars, Oats ‘n Honey
Quaker Chewy Chocolate Chip granola bar
Kellogg’s Nutrigrain Soft Baked Breakfast Bars, Strawberry
Whole Oats
365 Organic Old-Fashioned Rolled Oats
Quaker Steel Cut Oats
Quaker Old Fashioned Oats
Bob’s Red Mill Steel Cut Oats
Nature’s Path Organic Old Fashioned Organic Oats
Whole Foods Bulk Bin conventional rolled oats
Bob’s Red Mill Organic Old Fashioned Rolled Oats (4 samples tested)

Orange Juice Brands as Tested by Moms Across America (2017)
Tropicana
Minute Maid
Stater Bros.
Signature Farms
Kirkland
Ben & Jerry’s Ice Creams
Staple Crops as Reported by Friends of the Earth Europe (2013)
Soybeans
Soybean fodder
Cotton seed
Maize grain
Sorghum
Cotton seed
Maize grain
Barley straw and fodder Grass hay
Lentils
Sweetcorn
Sugar beet
Miscellaneous
Women’s Feminine Hygiene Products
Human Breast Milk as Reported by Mercola (2014)
Certain Vaccines
Cotton Clothing Products
Rainwater Samples (2014)
Human Urine samples
Groundwater Supplies

Final Thoughts
Additionally, it is believed by some that many products containing GMO’s are at risk of contamination, since glyphosate use has skyrocketed with the development of GMO staple crops.

The struggle to remove glyphosate from the market place and retire it from use forever is well-underway. Please share this list far and wide, add any additional testing that you find to the comment section below, and pressure your favorite retailers to take these products off the shelves.

https://www.wakingtimes.com/2018/08...sitive-for-monsantos-carcinogenic-glyphosate/

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Is there any relationship between gluten problems and glyphosate levels?

 

[Zippyjuan]

https://www.wakingtimes.com/2018/08...sitive-for-monsantos-carcinogenic-glyphosate/

The usual "dosage matters" applies- "detectable levels" are parts per billion. You would have to consume hundreds of pounds of these items every day to reach any problem levels.

But to be safe, it is best to avoid all foods since all foods will contain measurable levels of some sort of toxin.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/weed-killing-chemical-found-in-popular-breakfast-foods-1.4055532

The amounts of glyphosate found in the products typically measured in the hundreds of parts per billion, or less than 0.000001 per cent.

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/...nvironmental-working-groups-glyphosate-study/

EWG detected glyphosate in breakfast foods in the parts per billion range (ppb), which is insignificant to human health.

“Only trace amounts of glyphosate were found (made possible due to advances in analytical chemistry) and these were far below the levels that are permitted,” Charles said. And according to USA Today, “…. the amount allowed in grains [by the EPA] is 30 parts per million.”

The levels of glyphosate found by EWG ranged from 0-6% of what are universally considered acceptable levels—30ppm—set by both the US and the EU. And that government-determined level is itself considered incredibly conservative as it is. By the EPA’s standard, you’d have to eat 30 bowls or more of cheerios a day, every day, for more than a year to even approach the US limit, which is itself set 100 times or more lower than what might actually harm someone. EWG just made up its own, ridiculous, scare standard, which is 14,000 times lower than the EPA’s.

Everything is made up of chemicals, either organic or inorganic. The reality is that the human body has evolved to deal very effectively with minute quantities of chemicals in the world. This is why very few pesticides, most of which are natural, can harm us. Natural chemical pesticides, found in almost every plant, evolved as defensive measures to repel or kill pests like insects that prey on plants.

 

[donnay]

The usual "dosage matters" applies- "detectable levels" are parts per billion. You would have to consume hundreds of pounds of these items every day to reach any problem levels.

But to be safe, it is best to avoid all foods.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/weed-killing-chemical-found-in-popular-breakfast-foods-1.4055532

From the very article above:

To some scientists and related officials, none of these products individually contain high enough levels of glyphosate to pose a health risk, however, others argue that consuming trace amounts leads to dangerous accumulations within the body, as it is known to bio-accumulate in major organs and bones.

 

[donnay]

Is there any relationship between gluten problems and glyphosate levels?

I think as time goes on and more information becomes available I am sure you will see a connection.

 

[Zippyjuan]

From the very article above:

Waking Times is not a reliable source. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-waking-times/

https://www.innovationfiles.org/poi...ms-of-glyphosate-accumulation-in-breast-milk/

Claims of Bioaccumulation: Even if the findings claimed are repeatable, they confirm what has long been known: that glyphosate is rapidly eliminated from the body. This is the opposite of bioaccumulation, and nothing presented suggests any reason to reconsider the well founded understanding that glyphosate does not bioaccumulate.

One reason it does not bioaccumulate is that it is not fat soluble so you can't store it in your fatty tissues.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention note, “Just because we can detect levels of an environmental chemical in a person’s blood or urine does not necessarily mean that the chemical will cause effects or disease. Advances in analytical chemistry enable us to measure low levels of environmental chemicals in people, but separate studies of varying levels of exposure determine whether specific levels cause health effects.” Food naturally contains a wide-array of potentially toxic chemicals such as cyanide, strychnine, carototoxin, and arsenic but they are usually present at levels that do no harm. Any chemical, whether natural or human-made can hurt us if we consume too much of it. Even table salt or iron can kill if too much is consumed. The mere presence of glyphosate in serum, urine or mother’s milk is not a cause for alarm unless the levels are above those known to do harm. Over 4 decades of research studies and real-world use, including studies on large numbers of people who have been exposed to glyphosate, have allowed regulators to understand and set safe levels of exposure. Research has also established that the low levels of glyphosate sometimes found in bodily fluids pose no threat to health. WHO, EFSA, EPA and other regulatory agencies around the globe have concluded that trace levels of glyphosate in food should be of no more health concern than the presence of myriad potentially toxic chemicals that occur naturally in food.”

 

[donnay]

Waking Times is not a reliable source.

https://www.innovationfiles.org/poi...ms-of-glyphosate-accumulation-in-breast-milk/



One reason it does not bioaccumulate is that it is not fat soluble so you can't store it in your fatty tissues.

A Roundup of Roundup® Reveals Converging Pattern of Toxicity from Farm to Clinic to Laboratory Studies
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Roundup_of_Roundup.php

 

[Zippyjuan]

A Roundup of Roundup® Reveals Converging Pattern of Toxicity from Farm to Clinic to Laboratory Studies
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Roundup_of_Roundup.php

From the people who brought you "Death Camp Fukushima!" Billions dying!

a doubling or tripling of general mortality rates.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Waking Times is not a reliable source. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-waking-times/

https://www.innovationfiles.org/poi...ms-of-glyphosate-accumulation-in-breast-milk/

One reason it does not bioaccumulate is that it is not fat soluble so you can't store it in your fatty tissues.

Are you going to drink a shot of it every morning to prove that it is “rapidly elimnated from the body”?

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Waking Times is not a reliable source. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-waking-times/

I love these new sites that bill themselves as "fact check," but then offer little to no facts. Your own site partially CALLED "fact check" is--itself--loaded with value judgments that are not facts. They can't even spell words correctly. An example from your link. "...well know purveyor of pseudoscience..." Where are the facts to back the opinion that the site he* vilifies is well known?

Most of your site's critique is adjective phrases like "reliable source" without any facts to back up those phrases.



*I use the word "he" for clarity. In fact, your article has no author listed at the top of the page. It doesn't even have a date. Facts, indeed!

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

The usual "dosage matters" applies- "detectable levels" are parts per billion.

I have already said that parts per billion can be significant in measuring toxicity. For example, some toxins in city water are unacceptable at a few parts per billion. Your logic is that of a wide-eyed kindergartner--a number with all those whopping zeros doesn't matter!

 

[angelatc]

Is there any relationship between gluten problems and glyphosate levels?

Aside from the fact that there's no evidence to support 99% of gluten problems or the fact that glyphosate is not actually proven cancerous, you mean?

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Aside from the fact that there's no evidence to support 99% of gluten problems or the fact that glyphosate is not actually proven cancerous, you mean?

I’m not on the anti-gluten band wagon, as it currently appears to mostly be a psychosomatic and fad issue.

But the question is scientifically valid, and worth exploring. Increasing levels of glyphosate may have some effects on sensitive people, and that reaction could be mistaken for a gluten problem, when it is really a contamination issue.

 

[angelatc]

I have already said that parts per billion can be significant in measuring toxicity. For example, some toxins in city water are unacceptable at a few parts per billion. Your logic is that of a wide-eyed kindergartner--a number with all those whopping zeros doesn't matter!

You and I get along. But what part of this confuses you?

The levels of glyphosate found by EWG ranged from 0-6% of what are universally considered acceptable levels—30ppm—set by both the US and the EU. And that government-determined level is itself considered incredibly conservative as it is. By the EPA’s standard, you’d have to eat 30 bowls or more of cheerios a day, every day, for more than a year to even approach the US limit, which is itself set 100 times or more lower than what might actually harm someone. EWG just made up its own, ridiculous, scare standard, which is 14,000 times lower than the EPA’s.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

You and I get along. But what part of this confuses you?

I didn't actually read any of the thread. I now mostly just come here to mess with Zip.

 

[angelatc]

I’m not on the anti-gluten band wagon, as it currently appears to mostly be a psychosomatic and fad issue.

But the question is scientifically valid, and worth exploring. Increasing levels of glyphosate may have some effects on sensitive people, and that reaction could be mistaken for a gluten problem, when it is really a contamination issue.

But we're talking about the same people who insist MSG is dangerous, gluten is irritating, and glyphosate is cancerous. There is no evidence or even any documentation to support that theory.

 

[angelatc]

Are you going to drink a shot of it every morning to prove that it is “rapidly elimnated from the body”?

Are you equipped to set up the study and monitor the results?

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Are you equipped to set up the study and monitor the results?

Arrange the grant and I could put it together.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

But we're talking about the same people who insist MSG is dangerous, gluten is irritating, and glyphosate is cancerous. There is no evidence or even any documentation to support that theory.

Yes, but that goes both ways. On the other side we have government telling us what is safe or not, and their track record isn’t very good either.

 

[opal]