The Libertarian Party Chairman is Denouncing Ron Paul Again

Origanalist

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
43,054
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archive...-party-chairman-is-denouncing-ron-paul-again/

Written by Adam Dick
Tuesday June 18, 2019


You may recall United States Libertarian Party Chairman Nicholas Sarwark, in a December of 2016 interview, denouncing prominent libertarian communicator Ron Paul’s support for states’ rights. In that interview, Sarwark said Paul, who ran three times for US president including once as the Libertarian Party nominee, “had policy prescriptions that were straight-up wrong and anti-libertarian.”

Sarwark is back this week with a fresh denunciation of Paul. Writing in a Twitter thread on Monday, Sarwark insinuates that Paul is a supporter of the governments of China and Venezuela. Following that strange comment, Sarwark suggests that Paul is not opposing “Russian interference in the internal affairs of our government” because, get this, the Russian government secretly backed Paul’s 2008 presidential campaign. Sarwark even tries to back up this Russia nonsense with a preposterous Medium article that you can read here. Go ahead and read the article, for the laughs at least.

Better yet, you can watch Paul’s May of 2016 video address at the US Libertarian Party’s national convention in response to his receipt of a Hall of Liberty award for his achievement in advancing the libertarian movement. In the address Paul offers some advice to members of the party.

Copyright © 2019 by RonPaul Institute. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.
Please donate to the Ron Paul Institute

http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archive...-party-chairman-is-denouncing-ron-paul-again/
 
lol I got nothing to say, just the ramblings of a complete lunatic
Next up: Neo Nazi says "I like Ron Paul" Ron Paul racist confirmed
 
Dkg0Rk.gif
 
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archive...-party-chairman-is-denouncing-ron-paul-again/

Written by Adam Dick
Tuesday June 18, 2019


You may recall United States Libertarian Party Chairman Nicholas Sarwark, in a December of 2016 interview, denouncing prominent libertarian communicator Ron Paul’s support for states’ rights. In that interview, Sarwark said Paul, who ran three times for US president including once as the Libertarian Party nominee, “had policy prescriptions that were straight-up wrong and anti-libertarian.”

Sarwark is back this week with a fresh denunciation of Paul. Writing in a Twitter thread on Monday, Sarwark insinuates that Paul is a supporter of the governments of China and Venezuela. Following that strange comment, Sarwark suggests that Paul is not opposing “Russian interference in the internal affairs of our government” because, get this, the Russian government secretly backed Paul’s 2008 presidential campaign. Sarwark even tries to back up this Russia nonsense with a preposterous Medium article that you can read here. Go ahead and read the article, for the laughs at least.
...

Neocon says what?
 
I don't know what that's about.



That's about Ron and most other libertarians taking the wrong position vis a vis intervention in Venezuela, which they do.



And that's nonsense.

Yep, Ron Paul is wrong for not supporting the US invasion of Venezuela. I wonder if Libyan, Iraqi and Syrian invasion has anything to do with your support of a new invasion?

Do you also support the invasion of Iran? they are actually more of a socialist country than Venezuela and could be in need of some capitalism conversion bombs :).
 
Yep, Ron Paul is wrong for not supporting the US invasion of Venezuela.

No, I also don't support a US invasion of Venezuela.

Ron is wrong for opposing intervention in Venezuela in principle.

I wonder if Libyan, Iraqi and Syrian invasion has anything to do with your support of a new invasion?

I don't support a new invasion and didn't support any of those.

Do you also support the invasion of Iran?

Nope

they are actually more of a socialist country than Venezuela

Data on Iran is scarce, but I kindly doubt that.
 
Back
Top