The Left and Right Are Two Halves of the Same Regime

PAF

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
13,559

By Gary D. Barnett
August 17, 2024


“In the present case it is a little inaccurate to say I hate everything. I am strongly in favor of common sense, common honesty and common decency. This makes me forever ineligible to any public office of trust or profit in the ‘Republic.’ But I do not repine, for I am a subject of it only by force of arms.” ~ H.L. Mencken


Actually, all politicians and parties fit into the same paradigm called rule, regardless of so-called rhetorical grandstanding when attempting to claim that they are different spots on the same ass. However, in this country, the claimed left and right control the entire narrative, because they control the entire political process. (Not really, but their controllers do) The others, including ‘independents’ and ‘libertarians,’ would be no different, because the most common denominator of all those who seek rule and therefore power, is to control and manage the people by taxation and force of government. The only entity that is exempt from this power-seeking insanity, are anarchists, but then, anarchists abhor government and governing of people, believe only in “no rule,” so are not a risk to any freedom seeking individual. It is the single only thought existing that is completely non-political, and therefore the only sane option based on natural law.

This is not anything new or current, it has always been the case, even though many would attempt to argue this point; each side claiming to be one thing or the other, and in opposition against each other, when both seek the very same agendas. Certainly, there are some necessary exceptions, but those exceptions are fraudulent, and meant only to falsely distinguish one from the other, and this is just in order to fool the fools.

To figure this out, one need only look at all the connections of both parties, and other political entities as well, and the overlap will be so damning as to easily be seen as sinister; this going back many decades. Probably the best and most referenced material to view concerning this issue, is the work of Whitney Webb, now of the Unlimited hangout. Once one takes the time to do individual research and study, it becomes obvious that everything going on, and much more than 99% of the population are completely unaware of, the ties among all the criminal governing elements are not only telling of the mass collusion (conspiracy) between parties, corporations, banking, all ‘intelligence’ organizations, media, and the Zionist Israeli cabal, but are so massive in scope as to be nearly unbelievable. It is literally astounding.

But with all this said, and all the information available from very reliable sources, with reference and source material easily available to any willing to look, (at least for now) there is no excuse for the insane behavior of the general population. It lends to the credibility that the indoctrination and brainwashing of the masses has been a complete success, as stated by myself and many others, that this population is too far gone to be relied upon to ever seek real freedom. It is my contention that the bulk of society will continue to ‘vote’ for masters to rule them, will continue to obey as slaves, and to cower and bow down to the mandates and orders handed down by the ruling class. The most evil Trump and Harris fiasco will bear this out, as a narcissistic, lying, egotistical political plant will face off with an evil woke communist and perverted specimen plant, as most of the ‘voting public’ will fully participate in the wicked process called elections. This will guarantee the finishing destruction of all that is sane, regardless of which piece of garbage is selected by the deep state mob this time around.

Looking deep into the backgrounds of all four of these political scum, (Trump, Vance, Harris, and Walz) is enough to sicken even the most loyal followers or ignorant among this population. With that said, it matters not who is running for office, as all are of the same cloth, regardless of any claims to the contrary, and regardless of any party affiliation. Any targeted research whatsoever, any understanding of the close connections among all these high-level politicians, and throughout our history, is enough for anyone who still possess any aptitude toward logic, reason, or any ability whatsoever to think critically, to abandon immediately any connection to any nation-state, country, or governing structure.

Obviously, I cannot go into all the connections, all the corruption, all the perversions, all the lying, all the theft, and all the murderous policies of those politicians who claim to rule this country, in this short overview. Even if I simply added much of the reference material appropriate for this subject matter, it would take reams of paper; so much so as to guarantee that few if any would wade through all the material (or any) available exposing the mass criminal exploits of all of the political class in this country. It is overwhelming to say the least.

Two of the best sources are certainly the work of James Corbett and Whitney Webb, but there are many more. In just this one piece by Webb, “Government by Blackmail”, there is enough information linking all these criminals, that any who read this article thoroughly, will come away stunned at this fully referenced information, and it only begins to touch the surface of the criminal and conspiratorial nature of all U.S. politics.

Mencken declared perfectly the state of being concerning ‘democracy’ and the collective ignorance of humanity:


“Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance. No one in this world, so far as I know—and I have researched the records for years, and employed agents to help me—has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”​


Since the beginning of time, man has been oppressed by the very few who claimed control over all through one or another psychotic governing structure. The few kings, dictators, and oligarchs were able to gain control over billions, while those billions did absolutely nothing to eliminate the heinous system called rule. It is no different in this country, as the few in power took it by force and deceit, while the masses fully accepted it without resistance. In other words, all freedom was voluntarily abandoned in favor of rule, of a master/slave model based on total obedient submission to false authority. This can only lead to a slaughterhouse effect, where the weak and all those who actively dissent, can be rounded up, put into cages, (camps) subject to constant wars, and be made dependent on the very government that was intentionally allowed to gain power over them.

This is madness, this is insanity, and this next ‘election’ cycle will bear this out in spades, but I suspect that few will even have a clue as to what they have allowed to take place. That is the sad state of affairs that consumes this ‘country’ and its controlled and compliant population; one that risks total annihilation at the hands of its chosen masters.


“I have never voted in my life… I have always known and understood that the idiots are in a majority so it’s certain they will win.” ~ Louis-Ferdinand Céline



https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/08...eft-and-right-are-two-cheeks-of-the-same-ass/
 
Yea and it can be all traced back to Abraham Lincoln.

What you're seeing is basically Stockholm syndrome, but on a geopolitical scale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PAF
I prefer to think of the Left and Right as the two wings of the same bird.

That's what they teach you in government schools. What they don't teach you is that it was originally a Regime but they changed it to a bird to make it more appealing. One of the think-tanks back in the day decided to use the eagle.
 
IMG_2810.jpeg
 
Capitalism

Nobody else who frequents this site uses that word the same way you do. We all call free enterprise "capitalism", we call what you keep talking about (where big business and government are in bed together) "corporatism" or "fascism". And you know it.

Do you keep using the same wrong word the way the corporatist, fascist media does for any particular reason? Like, you enjoy irritating people, perhaps?
 
Nobody else who frequents this site uses that word the same way you do. We all call free enterprise "capitalism", we call what you keep talking about (where big business and government are in bed together) "corporatism" or "fascism". And you know it.

Do you keep using the same wrong word the way the corporatist, fascist media does for any particular reason? Like, you enjoy irritating people, perhaps?

Capitalism is not free enterprise. That false equation is not being used by me. Capitalism is the workings of capitalists, not entrepreneurs.

I've posted much on the subject here, so that most understand what I'm saying. Here's a link to such posts.

CapitalISM was not a word until fairly recently. For example, 1828 Websters doesn't have it, but it says of CapitalIST:

CAPITALIST, noun A man who has a capital or stock in trade, usually denoting a man of large property, which is or may be employed in business

My posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/search.php?searchid=35194195

In history, the conflict between Americans and high finance was a big topic. It was a European problem. Later, as those capitalists came to take over America, it wasn't long before they were successful in taking us over with their bank and their corporations and wars. I have given you suggested historians and economists to read. For example if you can get just one book and you'll see a summmary, of what Americans were saying about all this when it was starting to change the country. Such as this one: "The End Of American History: Democracy, Capitalism, and the Metaphor of Two Worlds in Anglo-American Historical Writing, 1880-1980" by David W. Noble.

You can get this book probably for a fin because nobody reads anymore.

Look at this chart and consider what it means. Think deeply.

gngn.jpg
 
Last edited:
Capitalism is not free enterprise. That false equation is not being used by me. Capitalism is the workings of capitalists, not entrepreneurs.

You could put an asterisk by the word. Or just use corporatist or fascist out of courtesy. If you insist on using a word in a way that the people you're trying to communicate with don't, why use it at all? Are you purposely trying to get yourself flamed?
 
You could put an asterisk by the word. Or just use corporatist or fascist out of courtesy. If you insist on using a word in a way that the people you're trying to communicate with don't, why use it at all? Are you purposely trying to get yourself flamed?

I wrote more in the post above. Take another look.
If you want to communicate on a high level, I'll respond. If not, well, why bother.
 
I wrote more in the post above. Take another look.
If you want to communicate on a high level, I'll respond. If not, well, why bother.

What if we see people like Friedman using the word the way we do, and say to ourselves, this joker has never communicated with us on as high a level as this Friedman guy did? Would you then forgive us for not letting you redefine the word for us the way liberals like to do?

 
Last edited:
What if we see people like Friedman using the word the way we do, and say to ourselves, this joker has never communicated with us on as high a level as this Friedman guy did? Would you then forgive us for not letting you redefine the word for us the way liberals like to do?

He's just reinforcing the lies and forcibly instilled peceptions. He uses Soviet Union and Communist China as examples, but he's never going to tell you the truth, which is that both those systems were created BY capitalists (Russian revolution) and allowed to take over (China) for capitalists. It is an historic fact. Capitalists drove us to support and maintain Soviet Union and China. We went to war against their enemies (Germany, Italy, Japan), and then assimilated those defeated into the capitalist government, which quickly decided there were intentional benefits produced from their existence and success... a situation that lasted for generations.

Capitalistst apologists like Friedman were IN on the scam. It was a conspiracy. They conviced simpletons that no human progress or invention was possible without their fake money skrill and their consolidation of power. I told you before there was no capital-ISM until Marxism. He has the audacity to say there was no prosperity until there was capitalism. An abject lie or total ignorance. He is one of them. And he fooled you. Because you lack knowledge.
 
He's just reinforcing the lies and forcibly instilled peceptions. He uses Soviet Union and Communist China as examples, but he's never going to tell you the truth, which is that both those systems were created BY capitalists (Russian revolution) and allowed to take over (China) for capitalists. It is an historic fact. Capitalists drove us to support and maintain Soviet Union and China. We went to war against their enemies (Germany, Italy, Japan), and then assimilated those defeated into the capitalist government, which quickly decided there were intentional benefits produced from their existence and success... a situation that lasted for generations.

By which time they were corporatists, fascists, and/or imperialists. No argument is possible; that's what they were by the very definitions of all three words according to the vast number of people who use them. So all of this makes no difference to my point. Around here, we define capitalists as entrepreneurs, not corporatists. And if you can't agree to that, maybe you should avoid the word and sidestep misunderstandings.

Communication is communication. Causing confusion is trollery. I guess the question then becomes, why do you come here? To share information and ideas, or to get flamed?

Capitalistst apologists like Friedman were IN on the scam. It was a conspiracy. They conviced simpletons that no human progress or invention was possible without their fake money skrill and their consolidation of power. I told you before there was no capital-ISM until Marxism. He has the audacity to say there was no prosperity until there was capitalism. An abject lie or total ignorance. He is one of them. And he fooled you. Because you lack knowledge.

If so, they were damned fools if they paid him one single penny. He never convinced anyone that no human progress was possible without fiat currency and centralized power. In fact, he convinced a great many people -- even a few simpletons -- of the exact opposite, that those things impede human progress.

Think he was a double agent?
 
By which time they were corporatists, fascists, and/or imperialists. No argument is possible; that's what they were by the very definitions of all three words according to the vast number of people who use them. So all of this makes no difference to my point. Around here, we define capitalists as entrepreneurs, not corporatists. And if you can't agree to that, maybe you should avoid the word and sidestep misunderstandings.

Communication is communication. Causing confusion is trollery. I guess the question then becomes, why do you come here? To share information and ideas, or to get flamed?



If so, they were damned fools if they paid him one single penny. He never convinced anyone that no human progress was possible without fiat currency and centralized power. In fact, he convinced a great many people -- even a few simpletons -- of the exact opposite, that those things impede human progress.

Think he was a double agent?

I showed you how this "capitalism" is a weaponised word that THE CAPITALISTS created with a purpose to infect the philosophy of Americans and Western democracies. Look, here's an 1886 unabridged Websters. IT'S NOT EVEN THERE.
https://archive.org/details/websterscomplete00webs/mode/2up?q=capitalism

And you have the gumption to say I don't belong "here"? I'm more American than you are, because you're pushing the Blackrock narrative that capitalism is commerce and capitalism is sound money. FAR FROM IT ! It was capitalists who conspired and took over our Constitutional money. It IS capitalists who bring us socialism and liberal polcies and globalism and wars that benefit capitalists.
 
I never said you don't belong here. I just asked why you do the things you do. Looks like the answer is, with liberals changing the definition of a word is propagandistic, but with you doing the same thing with the same word is merely a hobby. Fair enough.
 
Back
Top