The Importance of the Virginia Governor's Race for Libertarians

[speciallyblend]

If I were a Virginia voter, I'd hold my nose and cast my ballot for The Cooch for strategic reasons. Having said this, I totally understand why other libertarian-leaning voters find him underwhelming and are opting for Sarvis instead. There's really no clear "good guy" in this race, and some people just have different priorities than others.

hey some common sense in rpf omg screen shot!!

 

[Keith and stuff]

If I were a Virginia voter, I'd hold my nose and cast my ballot for The Cooch for strategic reasons. Having said this, I totally understand why other libertarian-leaning voters find him underwhelming and are opting for Sarvis instead. There's really no clear "good guy" in this race, and some people just have different priorities than others.

That's how I feel. Though I'd likely also volunteer for Ken to get the chicken sandwiches, pizza and so on. While I beleive Sarvis is much more pro-liberty, I beleive Ken is the most pro-liberty candidate to even be elected to statewide office in VA and I'd vote and volunteer for him because I believe he has a slight chance of actually winning.

Change the sign to warm and frequent food and you got me

PS. Though, perhaps I'm not a woman, don't wear rings and don't have nice nails

 

[jhon]

Former Rep. Ron Paul speaks at Ken Cuccinelli's election-eve campaign rally in Richmond, Virginia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJNuv-NcQM8

 

[Bastiat's The Law]

The LP candidate supports carbon taxes.

 

[speciallyblend]

The LP candidate supports carbon taxes.

and the gop supports bigger gov and taxes and a va history to show it, so if you want to nick pick ,republicans are the dems best friend.

 

[Peace&Freedom]

and the gop supports bigger gov and taxes and a va history to show it, so if you want to nick pick ,republicans are the dems best friend.

The real problem, in a nutshell.

 

[speciallyblend]

another tidbit i saw on fb, sums it up nicely to the coochies out there,For the last 48 hours, Cuccinelli apologists have been claiming that Cuccinelli was, despite his statist social agenda, more libertarian than Sarvis.

Guess what, Cuccinelli? You had the opportunity to actually prove that. Not by having your staff make outlandish claims on this facebook page. BY DEBATING ROB SARVIS, WHEN HE REPEATEDLY INVITED YOU TO.

Or, at least, by not childishly refusing to debate Sarvis....

That’s the thing about Libertarian votes. You actually have to earn them.

As future advice for the RNC and DNC: if you want to prove that your candidate is “more libertarian” than the Libertarian candidate, consider actually debating the Libertarian to prove it.