The Great Cancer Hoax Part II: The Brilliant Cure the FDA Tried Their Best to Shut Down...

As a cancer "survivor", I can say your post is not entirely true. While I don't discount the profit motive, cancer treatments are always progressing and mortality rates dropping. And I don't believe the researchers are looking for ways to make a buck as opposed to curing a disease.

That's really encouraging... I should probably clarify that I'm talking about the guys at the top of the big Pharmaceutical corporations and the ones who used to have their jobs, who are now running the FDA. I don't doubt that the researchers working for them have good intentions and that some good things are coming from their efforts. But I do think the guys at the top deliberately suppress certain things when they can't make any money off them, like DCA which is super cheap, and concentrated cannabis oil which people can grow in their own back yards and cook in their kitchen.

By the way--congrats! :)
 
That's really encouraging... I should probably clarify that I'm talking about the guys at the top of the big Pharmaceutical corporations and the ones who used to have their jobs, who are now running the FDA. I don't doubt that the researchers working for them have good intentions and that some good things are coming from their efforts. But I do think the guys at the top deliberately suppress certain things when they can't make any money off them, like DCA which is super cheap, and concentrated cannabis oil which people can grow in their own back yards and cook in their kitchen.

By the way--congrats! :)

Thanks for that, and I agree with the rest. I have no doubt suppression of findings happens if they can't make a buck.
 

Sure, similar to the phkillscancer.com method. Raise blood alkalinity, with sugar that the cancer is attracted to. My father had prostate cancer and tried baking soda and molasses method from phkillscancer.com. Got his PSA numbers to drop to safe levels. But then I don't know what he did (or did not do) other than talk to his oncologist who told him "it works for a while, but the body adapts and then it is not effective. you need the surgery." We don't talk that much... my opinion, he was hoodwinked by the Dr who needed to pay for his new expensive robotic cutting device. (I didn't know about RSO when he was going through this, but he probably would have ignored that anyway, as it is "illegal" and all.)

If it were me, I would raise my blood alkalinity to 8.5 for a few weeks and take the cannabis oil at the same time. Chemo kills more than it saves.
 
What is the shame of all of this-- in a truly free market people would have the option of trying different methods without government interference.

As usual when government gets involved people die. :(
 
I'm taking my uncle for more chemo today. The oncologist has convinced him that it's for "pain management", since I got him to admit it won't help in stopping or slowing down the cancer, and that it is debilitating. This is his 5th round (of 3 day sessions). I just watch as he gets worse and worse with each round of chemo, then goes a few weeks, gets more strength and starting to get his color back, then....doc talks him into more chemo... (and he hasn't had any scans since the chemo started end of last year).
 
Last edited:
As a cancer "survivor", I can say your post is not entirely true. While I don't discount the profit motive, cancer treatments are always progressing and mortality rates dropping. And I don't believe the researchers are looking for ways to make a buck as opposed to curing a disease.


Congrats on surviving! I'm sure the experience was tremendously unpleasant, but I'm definitely happy for you!

I think your take on this is exactly correct - cancer treatments today are far more humane than they were a generation or two ago, and the success rates are much higher. And thank God for that, because even now the treatments are terrible and the success rates not high enough. But, as you rightly stated, things are progressing, and just last week I read an amazing article about the hormones that cancer cells give-off that prevents white blood cells from attacking them, and how scientists have found ways to stop the cells from creating that hormone.
 
As a cancer "survivor", I can say your post is not entirely true. While I don't discount the profit motive, cancer treatments are always progressing and mortality rates dropping. And I don't believe the researchers are looking for ways to make a buck as opposed to curing a disease.

It is a shame that some folks around here have a desire to denigrate the tremendous and difficult work that so many scientists, researchers, doctors, and nurses are doing to make the battle against cancer less horrific.

And it belies logic. The company that finds a "cure" for cancer, will be obscenely wealthy. And they'll be the toast of every town, and anyone involved in the project will have absolutely no trouble finding speaking engagements after the fact. A cancer cure DOES make financial sense, for the company that discovers it.
 
I'm taking my uncle for more chemo today. The oncologist has convinced him that it's for "pain management", since I got him to admit it won't help in stopping or slowing down the cancer, and that it is debilitating. This is his 5th round (of 3 day sessions). I just watch as he gets worse and worse with each round of chemo, then goes a few weeks, gets more strength and starting to get his color back, then....doc talks him into more chemo... (and he hasn't had any scans since the chemo started end of last year).

Ya, that's the kind of stuff that really sucks. Watching people go down a slow torturous path like that. My kids had a friend with leukemia, he finally decided he wasn't going to do it anymore and opted to die. Nobody could blame him. This shit can be a really ugly business.

I stopped my radiation treatments before they were done, said no mas.
 
Last edited:
It is a shame that some folks around here have a desire to denigrate the tremendous and difficult work that so many scientists, researchers, doctors, and nurses are doing to make the battle against cancer less horrific.

And it belies logic. The company that finds a "cure" for cancer, will be obscenely wealthy. And they'll be the toast of every town, and anyone involved in the project will have absolutely no trouble finding speaking engagements after the fact. A cancer cure DOES make financial sense, for the company that discovers it.


Yeah tell that to Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski and G. Edward Griffin. The FDA is the armed enforcers for Big pHARMa. Big pHARMa does not want anyone cutting into their profits. They instruct doctors with a one-size-fits-all approach to combating certain cancers and by putting people in the poor house as a result.


The Cancer Industry is a booming trillion dollar industry. In Boston alone, the Dana Farber Institute brings in $800 million a year. If cures were found, imagine the cut in revenue that would bring? I personally knew three people who went to Dana Farber and died a slow painful death within a year of being diagnosed. Their families had to mortgage their homes, and were pretty much left bankrupt in the process. Sorry if I am a little cynical about how the norm operates.


Sources:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Ryter/jon353.htm
http://www.newson6.com/story/220578...porarily-shut-down-amid-federal-investigation
http://www.downsizedcfoundation.org/fda.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/032998_Burzynski_cancer_cures.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana–Farber_Cancer_Institute
 
Last edited:
What is the shame of all of this-- in a truly free market people would have the option of trying different methods without government interference.

As usual when government gets involved people die. :(

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to donnay again.

I don't have anything against the pharmaceutical companies doing what they do obviously, but government involvement can't do anything but stifle advance and pick winners like always.
 
Last edited:
Evidence suggests that up to 90 percent of landmark cancer research may be false
Tuesday, May 07, 2013 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer




The vast majority of the published scientific literature on cancer and cancer research is inherently flawed and non-reproducible, reveals a new review published online in the journal Nature. Researchers C. Glenn Begley and Lee Ellis found that a mere 11 percent of 53 papers on cancer published in reputable, peer-reviewed journals was solid, while the other 89 percent could not be reproduced, implying that it may be false or at the very least misleading.

Preclinical studies are the basis upon which the scientific community at large determines how best to develop treatments for disease, including potential new approaches to treating cancer. But such studies, though sure to contain some minor flaws from time to time, appear to be missing the boat in major ways on a regular basis. And the end result of this intrinsic failure is a cancer treatment system that is not only outdated but potentially completely misguided.

"The scientific community assumes that the claims in a preclinical study can be taken at face value - that although there might be some errors in detail, the main message of the paper can be relied on and the data will, for the most part, stand the test of time," wrote the authors about their findings. "Unfortunately, this is not always the case."

Based on a review of 53 published papers on cancer, Begley and Ellis discovered that only six of them could be reproduced and confirmed in a clinical setting. And the worst part was that the 53 papers were considered to be "landmark," which means they are generally recognized as having had a significant impact on cancer research due to presenting some new cancer treatment approach or novel therapy for targeting cancer cells.

"t looks like the scientific literature is contaminated with a growing number of tainted studies, which may reach 89 percent, the results of which are not reproducible by any means," writes Eleni Roumeliotou for GreenMedInfo.com about the shocking findings. "This means that to an extent, we have based our healthcare and clinical guidelines on fake studies that reported untruthful results in order to accommodate the interests of industrial corporations."


Many cancer studies influenced by Big Pharma conflicts of interest

The fact of the matter is that a considerable amount of published scientific research is questionable at best due to influence from the pharmaceutical industry. A similar but unrelated study that looked at research funding found that at least 17 percent of published research papers in general were conducted with serious conflicts of interest, which more often than not stemmed from drug industry funding that steered the research in a pre-determined direction.

"Given the frequency we observed for conflicts of interest and the fact that conflicts were associated with study outcomes, I would suggest that merely disclosing conflicts is probably not enough," says Dr. Reshma Jagsi, M.D., author of a University of Michigan (UM) study that found a considerable percentage of cancer research to be tainted by conflicts of interest. "It's becoming increasingly clear that we need to look more at how we can disentangle cancer research from industry ties."

Sources for this article include:

http://www.uofmhealth.org

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v485/n7396/full/485041e.html

http://www.greenmedinfo.com

http://www.cancer.org

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23277767
 
I'm taking my uncle for more chemo today. The oncologist has convinced him that it's for "pain management", since I got him to admit it won't help in stopping or slowing down the cancer, and that it is debilitating. This is his 5th round (of 3 day sessions). I just watch as he gets worse and worse with each round of chemo, then goes a few weeks, gets more strength and starting to get his color back, then....doc talks him into more chemo... (and he hasn't had any scans since the chemo started end of last year).

Please Google (or Duck Duck) "Rick Simpson Oil Cancer". Cannabis oil will far exceed any "pain management" from chemo, and it might just cure the cancer too. But the success rate is lower for people who have had chemo as well, due to the horrible effects of the chemo alone.

There are pages and pages of Facebook testimonials and many YouTube videos on being cured by RSO.
 
Please Google (or Duck Duck) "Rick Simpson Oil Cancer". Cannabis oil will far exceed any "pain management" from chemo, and it might just cure the cancer too. But the success rate is lower for people who have had chemo as well, due to the horrible effects of the chemo alone.

There are pages and pages of Facebook testimonials and many YouTube videos on being cured by RSO.

Thanks, I will look into that. I watched a video about Rick Simpson. I'll have to find out how it's made.
 
Thanks, I will look into that. I watched a video about Rick Simpson. I'll have to find out how it's made.

Here is the video on making it:



I have never made it. I just found it about a month ago when a dog we _had_, had aggressive cancer and I started searching. Too late for our dog, but now I know (and many testimonials on dogs and beating the cancer the dog had.) But from all that I have seen and read about, to summarize:
  • 1 lbs indica or indica predominant, bone dry bud (NOT stems, leaves, shake, trim, etc - the bud) with 20%+ THC and good CBD %. He prefers "white widow", but he knows one white widow from another is highly variable, so it is not an end all be all. But strong indica for the relaxation it gives, and the body needs to relax when healing. Indoor grown will cost more, due to costs to grow it. Outdoor grown is fine too, and should be cheaper (no light bills.)
  • Wash in 2 rinses of pure light naphtha using a 2 x 2 stick to mix and break buds. (Pure, not with anything else in it), 3rd rinse is a waste and will start getting plant material / chlorophyll. ISO alcohol will work too, but need to filter better to remove chlorophyll. Some people use freezing grain alcohol, but he says naphtha gets the right spectrum of THC / CBD's etc and not the unwanted things outside that spectrum that other solvents will get. Naphtha (pure, light) is the choice.
  • Boil off naphtha in rice cooker or another device (presto kitchen kettle / distiller) where temp control is just at / below water boiling point. OPEN AIR / NO FLAME, smoking, etc. This can take a couple hours.
  • Add 5-10 drops of water close to end, as water boils at higher temp than naphtha.
  • Move to a small steel measuring cup / bowl and put on coffee cup warmer or coffee machine warming plate and let all water / naphtha completely cook off. There should be no more bubbles. But don't burn the oil. Again, a couple hours. (Some people with the Presto thing say they just lower temp and leave in that, overnight even.)
  • Package for use while warm. Will thicken when cool.
Should be a dark oil type color that will thicken to a sticky grease when cool. When smeared on white paper, the smear should ideally be golden honey amber colored without a green hue. No plant material / chunks in the oil. Final THC should be 95%+. Heating during this many hour long process will decarboxylate, which is needed. Shelf life should be many years if air tight, cool, dark place to store. Buying from someone else (Medical Dispensary, or other who says "yeah, I got RSO") will not promise right oil and may or may not be any good for the reasons you want it, unless it is someone who has saved others from cancers with the oil.

1 lbs of material to start will make about 60 grams of oil (more or less depending on material used and amount of resin, etc) If you want to start with 1/2 lbs, then about 30 grams should be output.

Start off with an amount that looks like 1/2 a grain of dry white rice. Build up to 1 gram a day (spread out through out day.) 60 grams should be about 3 months (because of the ramp up period) and should (according to testimonies) cure most cancers. Some take more / longer. Some take less. Skin cancers can go in a few days with the oil in a band aid left on the spot for a few days. Has supposedly helped with diabetes, skin ulcers, arthritis, wrinkles, bald spots, etc. Can put in gel caps and swallow / use as suppository, etc. No cancer or a maintenance dose is about a grain of rice every couple / few days.

Here is the link to make it from the man who rediscovered it (Rick Simpson): http://phoenixtears.ca/make-the-medicine/

Good luck. We need to share info like this. Let us know if you do it, and what it does for your uncle.

My goal is to make some to have on hand for when I or someone I know needs it.

For those of you on Fakebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rick-Simpson/298774923502987?id=298774923502987&sk=photos_stream
 
Sure, similar to the phkillscancer.com method. Raise blood alkalinity, with sugar that the cancer is attracted to. My father had prostate cancer and tried baking soda and molasses method from phkillscancer.com. Got his PSA numbers to drop to safe levels. But then I don't know what he did (or did not do) other than talk to his oncologist who told him "it works for a while, but the body adapts and then it is not effective. you need the surgery." We don't talk that much... my opinion, he was hoodwinked by the Dr who needed to pay for his new expensive robotic cutting device. (I didn't know about RSO when he was going through this, but he probably would have ignored that anyway, as it is "illegal" and all.)

If it were me, I would raise my blood alkalinity to 8.5 for a few weeks and take the cannabis oil at the same time. Chemo kills more than it saves.

There's an update on that site
www.trojanhorsecure.com

ok.. coming clean here - it's my dad's site, his very first blog - wish I knew where to point him toward the oil - he's managed to get his ph to hold higher, longer than 15 minutes (overnight)

I did send along a couple of format suggestions - break up by date the subject matter and such.
 
wish I knew where to point him toward the oil - he's managed to get his ph to hold higher, longer than 15 minutes (overnight)

I did the phkillscancer method for a week like 9 months ago. I got my ph up over 8.5 for like 4 days. I tested with test strips several times thoughout the day to check. You need to drink the foul tasting stuff 2 -3 times each day. Yes, to me it taste horrid.

As far as pointing him to the oil, search. The Shona Banda method is for small amounts to get something. Google it.

Also, look around here a little: http://hempoilhope.org/

Wish I could say, hey, I got some oil for ya... but then of course I would be "breaking the law." ;)
 
Back
Top