The Federal Reserve: The Skeleton Key Of Tyranny

TheNung

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
29
I've been ecstatic over all the recent (negative) press about the Federal Reserve through Ron and Rand Paul and Mike Maloney's The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind. Personally, I think our money the most important issue of all. Now I had never even heard about the Federal Reserve until about 2 years ago and didn't muster up the courage to try to learn about it a few months ago, so obviously I'm far from an expert. But after learning a little about it, I started to think that if I could understand this then there isn't any reason why most other people shouldn't be able to as well.

So here's my attempt at putting the Federal Reserve System into the simplest possible words for people who may not be the most avid investigators of monetary history and policy. I generally tried to stick to the system itself and not it's history of failure or dubious origins. Please let me know what you think.

Original article at: http://simplefactsplainarguments.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-federal-reserve-skeleton-key-of.html

Regardless of their political beliefs, more and more people are realizing that there is something deeply wrong not only with this country, but with the world, and that it is getting worse every day. We see more wars, a government that's growing to truly frightening levels, more taxes, jobs leaving the country and unemployment in general, and absurdly high prices for just about everything.

With so much obviously wrong, many people get discouraged or disgusted and never find out that there is a single root cause to many of these problems and it's right under their nose. Without a doubt, the problem is our money and the system by which it is created: the Federal Reserve.

Entire civilizations have risen and fallen because of their money, yet few people know or even care where their money comes from or what is really is. It's an extremely difficult topic to discuss simply because any explanation is long-winded and the process is intentionally confusing. But if power can be bought - and everyone knows that a Senator is the best investment - then the power to create money out of thin air is a magic trick that obviously needs explaining. I understand that this is a long post, but please, take a little time to read this or bookmark it and check it out again later because it truly is the single most important issue facing not only us Americans but every person in the world.

The Federal Reserve System

The Federal Reserve is a central bank, which means that, through legal tender and anti-counterfeiting laws, the government has granted it a monopoly over the issuance of our money, allowing the cartel to collect interest on money it creates out of nothing. The Federal Reserve isn't a public or private institution, it's both. It's a cartel of private banks that could not exist without the support of government force.

I'm really not going to go into the history of the Fed because that's a different topic than how it works and how it affects us. Rest assured that it's a truly intriguing and rarely-told bedtime story that spans hundreds of years and features men who could buy entire countries, corrupt politicians, and the enslavement of unborn generations.

But lets take a closer look at how it works...

The money-creation process starts when our politicians vote to spend more money than the government actually has (or is willing to directly tax you and I for fear of public resistance) in order to pay for current social programs, wars, etc. But the money to pay for it all has to come from somewhere, right? Do you think your taxes pay for it? Nope. The country wouldn't be able to afford almost any of it if that were the case (more on where your taxes do go in just a moment). So where does the money come from?

The Federal Reserve can create money in three different ways. The first way, and the one that needs the most explanation, is by purchasing Treasury Bonds and other debts through a deliberately confusing and nonsensical process called...

Open Market Operations

What happens is the US Treasury borrows money by issuing a glorified IOU called a Treasury Bond. It's a piece of paper with fancy designs around the edges and a few signatures and it basically says "give us X amount of money and we'll pay you that amount back plus interest." The trick is that you and I, the American people, are responsible for the payment of the bond plus interest because our government claims to represent us. This is the national debt. A Treasury Bond is basically a promise to tax the American people for the amount of the bond plus interest. This is what your tax dollars are actually go toward: paying interest on our national debt (which is over $17 trillion dollars and growing).

But you and I don't pay each other in Treasury Bonds. Where does the actual money come in? Actually, by issuing the Treasury Bond, the government has basically created cash; it just doesn't look like cash. Yet. That's where The Fed comes in. To start the process, the US Treasury takes the bond it just issued and holds a bond auction among the world's largest banks. The banks buy part of our national debt (Treasury Bonds) hoping to make money off the interest payments (your taxes), and the government gets the money it needs to pay for whatever crap (guns and butter).

These banks then give the bond to the Fed, which then writes a check on itself for the amount of the bond. The Federal Reserve gives these checks back to the banks, and the banks use them to buy more Treasury Bonds so the government can keep spending on more crap. Once the government gets the money, it spends it, sending out checks to its employees, welfare beneficiaries, political allies, etc., dispersing throughout society and eventually winding up deposited in private bank accounts like yours and mine.

Here's the twist: the Fed doesn't actually have any money to pay for the bonds: its account balance is exactly zero. However, simply by writing out a fraudulent check, the Federal Reserve is creating money out of nothing. While you and I slave away our whole lives for money (and give the Dollar its only value by doing so), the Fed can just counterfeit it. If you or I attempted this, we'd be put in jail for fraud.

This is also where we get into the second way the Fed creates money:

Reserve Ratios

How this works is that in the Fed's accounting books (if it actually has any), the bond is now called a reserve, or the money available on demand. Using these reserves as a "base," they lend out 9 additional dollars for every dollar they have in reserve. So if the Treasury Bond was for one million dollars, the Federal Reserve gives the requested million to Congress, but also creates nine million dollars more to lend to banks as the source of every loan given to individuals or businesses in the country. It's important to note that although the Fed sets the reserve ratios for every bank in the country, reserve ratios of money that can be created out of thin air are largely pointless as the Fed can just create more money or alter reserve ratios as they wish.

This process, where not only the Federal Reserve but every bank in the country only has to keep on hand only a fraction of the amount of money they have lent out, is called fraudulent fractional reserve banking, and it's entirely based on the premise that everyone will never come for their money all at once.

So when you take your money to the bank and deposit, for example, $10,000, the bank isn't actually holding on to your $10,000 in a vault. It's keeping $1000 as a cash reserve, then loaning out $9000 from your deposit to various business interests while filling the difference in your account with bank credits/IOU's that are supposed to be redeemable on demand for cash. If someone comes in for a $9000 loan, the bank gives them the $9000 (while charging interest) and uses that person's debt as a fractional reserve to loan out even more money. Deposits become loans, loans become deposits, and this process snowballs as the money supply expands exponentially. This expansion of the money supply is called inflation, but is not to be confused with a general rise in prices (price inflation), which is simply an effect of inflation.

The third way the Fed creates money is refreshingly simple:

The "Discount Window"

This is just the name of the process where banks can take out loans from the Federal Reserve at extremely low interest rates and then loan out that money at higher interest rates for a profit. Remember that the principles of fractional reserve banking and reserve ratios also apply here, so basically the Fed takes our tax dollars, multiplies them because it can, then gives that money out to member banks so they can lend our money right back to us.

The Effects

While actual paper dollars only account for a small minority of the dollars in existence (the majority are simply numbers in a book or digits on a screen), this whole process amounts to little more than a more sophisticated, confusing, and less obvious way of turning on a printing press and firing cash out of a window or dropping money out of a helicopter. Sounds pretty awesome, right? That is, until you consider that every time the Federal Reserve does this, simple supply and demand dictates that the money that you and I own is losing value - almost 10% a year (ShadowStats.com). Since the Federal Reserve was chartered in 1913, the US Dollar has lost about 96% of its value (www.usinflationcalculator.com). That means an item bought in 1913 for just $1 would cost ~$23.50 now, all because of inflation.

It's a hidden tax that affects the lower classes, those who save their money, and those living on fixed incomes the most. On the other hand, the very nature of The Fed and central banking in general funnels the wealth of the masses to the people closest to the money-fountain, which are usually bankers and other business leaders, politicians, and the ruling class in general, which is exactly why you hear so often that 95% percent of the country's money is in only 5% of the people's hands.

As the country goes further into debt and the Fed adds more money to the economy, there will eventually come a point where there are so many dollars in existence and the Fed is adding more at such a high rate that they simply aren't worth anything. This is called hyperinflation. Many countries throughout history have experienced hyperinflation. In fact, fiat money (money that has no value except for a government decree saying it's worth such-and-such amount) has a 100% failure rate throughout history.

Yes, that's a pile of money-bricks. The sad thing is the children in the picture are still poor as hell.
One country that experience hyperinflation was Germany after WW1. The German government was forced to add so much money to the economy that the German Mark became completely worthless. How worthless? So worthless that people would have to take a whole wheelbarrow full of money just to buy a dozen eggs or their take out their life's savings to get a loaf of bread. So worthless that adults used burned German Marks in their fireplaces for heat while children took the notes and made kites out of them. That kind of worthless.

Another side effect of the Fed's managing the money supply through reserves is the process of booms and busts/depressions/recessions. As the Fed injects money into the economy, it tricks people and businesses into making decisions as if they have money that they don't. They spend and take out loans because money is cheap and plentiful. Prices rise. People keep spending and borrowing. Prices keep rising. This is the boom or bubble.

Eventually prices rise to the point where even with all the cheap money, people don't feel comfortable paying the ridiculous prices and refuse to take on new debt, instead choosing to pay off old debt. Since our money is based on debt, when people pay back their debt, the money supply shrinks and prices begin to fall, and suddenly the market collapses as the bubble bursts. This is what happened recently in 2007/08, but the Fed has also been the reason behind every economic recession/depression since 1913, including the Great Depression.

Unwilling to let the free market's self-cleaning mechanism work itself out, the government then votes to spend even more money on bailouts, work programs, welfare, war, etc. to resurrect the dying economy, digging the hole even deeper and piling on more debt to be paid off by future generations. These programs and policies never work, and the recession always gets worse as the government gets involved.

What Now?

So let's finally recap: the Federal Reserve System is a cozy partnership between Big Banking and Big Government through which the banks can create money out of thin air and collect interest on it while the politicians get unlimited funding without the American people realizing that we're being taxed.

This virtually unlimited supply of money all but guarantees that our government will continue to expand and expand for as long as the Federal Reserve and fiat money exists, destroying our wealth and the wealth of those who follow us.

The way I see it, there are three things that need to be done to fix the problem with our money:

1. Abolish legal tender laws - Doing so will allow for consumer's choice through competing currencies. Legal tender laws are the backbone are the Federal Reserve System. This is a necessary step before we go ahead and...

2. Abolish the Federal Reserve - This should be obvious by now. The Fed has failed disastrously at its stated goals and fuels the creation of more debt.

3. Repudiate the National Debt - Why should you and I be forced to pay for something by the politicians of a previous generation? This is nothing more than politicians stealing from your kids and grandkids before they're even born.

No matter what, another economic crash is coming, and it's going to be enormous. It's inevitable given our futility of our monetary system. In fact, many countries around the world are beginning to view the Dollar as a ticking time bomb. Just about every country in the world uses the US Dollar to back their own currencies, and many, including Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, have already begun to take steps away from the US Dollar. China, in particular, is buying gold faster than it can be mined.

However, by following the above recommendations, we could at least minimize the damage done by this inherently evil system by not allowing the hole to get any deeper. Even more importantly we could bring freedom to our money by taking away the guns that back it, and we could free unborn generations from being born into serfdom. This isn't just an important issue, it's the issue, and people need to know about it.

There are many books that do a better job explaining all this than I ever could. Here are several that I personally recommend (click the links to buy from Amazon and support SFPA):

End The Fed by Ron Paul
The Creature Of Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin
What Has Government Done To Our Money by Murray Rothbard

Also, here's a great show by Mike Maloney, who correctly predicted the 2007-08 crash, explaining the Federal Reserve System and its effects. It's called "The Biggest Scam In The History Of Mankind":



Please share!


Thanks again for reading!
 
Everyone should definitely watch Mike Maloney's entire series on the hidden secrets of money. But his explanation of how the money system really works is probably the best I've seen.
 
Pretty good TheNung. I still have a hard time wrapping my head around how currency comes into existence. The business cycle was a lot easier for me to comprehend. The fed manipulates interest rates. Interest is the price of borrowed money. Prices are a signal to both consumers and producers. Manipulated prices can lead to either over production or under production, it can also lead to over consumption or under consumption. Typically the fed drives the price of currency (interest rates) down. This leads to both over production and over consumption, (the bubble). Traditionally high interest rates are a signal to businesses that consumers are saving and not buying, indicating that it is a bad time to increase production or expand business. Not only do low interests rates falsely signal to business that consumers are buying, but cheap money makes it easier to take on bad risk. For consumers, time preferences come into play as well. High interest rates are an incentive to save. There is little incentive to save when interest rates are low, particularly when currency is losing value over time. Low interest rates are an incentive for consumers to spend and, or take on riskier investments. As we have seen in recent decades with low interest rates, not only are consumers unwilling to save, they also find an incentive to take on debt. Economist Roger Garrison showed that in the Keynesian system, the market or parts of the market push beyond the "production possibilities frontiers" (the bubble) and then contracts behind the PPF (the bust) rather than moving along the frontier. Eventually when all that debt consumers take on comes due, consumers are forced to slow or stop their spending. Businesses are suddenly without costumers (the bust).
 
Last edited:
TheNung,

I sort of boiled it down to this once.


SuperDollar502x600.jpg


No matter how much hard earned honest money the, we the people, can gather together to build their world the way they want, others inside and outside of the country can fire up the fake money presses and print up what ever it takes to dictate their will.
 
These banks then give the bond to the Fed, which then writes a check on itself for the amount of the bond. The Federal Reserve gives these checks back to the banks, and the banks use them to buy more Treasury Bonds so the government can keep spending on more crap. Once the government gets the money, it spends it, sending out checks to its employees, welfare beneficiaries, political allies, etc., dispersing throughout society and eventually winding up deposited in private bank accounts like yours and mine.

Seems to assume the Fed buys all the Treasury notes. The Fed owns $2.1 trillion out of $17 trillion US Treasury notes (about 12%).

Another side effect of the Fed's managing the money supply through reserves is the process of booms and busts/depressions/recessions. As the Fed injects money into the economy, it tricks people and businesses into making decisions as if they have money that they don't. They spend and take out loans because money is cheap and plentiful. Prices rise. People keep spending and borrowing. Prices keep rising. This is the boom or bubble.
Booms and busts have always happened- they are not unique to central bank financial systems.
 
Booms and busts have always happened- they are not unique to central bank financial systems.

This is strictly true. A boom-bust cycle may occur whenever there is any significant artificial expansion of credit.

Central banks are not necessary in order for such artificial expansions of credit to occur.

But central bank fiat creation is by far and away THE chief source of artificial credit expansions (and hence, of boom-bust cycles).

IOW: Central banks are a sufficient (but not necessary) material cause of boom-bust cycles.
However, they should not be "let off the hook" merely because there are other paths to boom-bust.
After all, burglars are not the only source of crime - but this fact does not exculpate burglary ...
 
Last edited:
The fatal die was cast on the USA in 1913.<IMHO> It's been all downhill since then.
Long before most of us were even born.:(
 
Last edited:
This is strictly true. A boom-bust cycle may occur whenever there is any significant artificial expansion of credit.

Central banks are not necessary in order for such artificial expansions of credit to occur.

But central bank fiat creation is by far and away THE chief source of artificial credit expansions (and hence, of boom-bust cycles).

IOW: Central banks are a sufficient (but not necessary) material cause of boom-bust cycles.
However, they should not be "let off the hook" merely because there are other paths to boom-bust.
After all, burglars are not the only source of crime - but this fact does not exculpate burglary ...
Bam! Right hook to the temple.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxcjT8T3EGU



Economic Cycles Before the Fed
http://www.libertyclassroom.com/panics/

Tom Woods said:
Quite a bit of work remains to be done from an Austrian perspective on nineteenth-century economic downturns. I don’t necessarily agree with everything in the links that follow, but here is some useful material to get you started.

Can We Live Without the Fed? by Thomas E. Woods

The Panic of 1837 and the Contraction of 1839–43: A Reassessment of Its Causes from an Austrian Perspective and a Critique of the Free Banking Interpretation by H.A. Scott Trask

The Independent Treasury: Origins, Rationale, and Record, 1846–1861 by H.A. Scott Trask

Banking Crises and the Rules of the Game by Charles Calomiris

Has the Fed Been a Failure? by George A. Selgin, William D. Lastrapes and Lawrence H. White

The Panic of 1819 by Murray N. Rothbard

A History of Money and Banking in the United States: The Colonial Era to World War II by Murray N. Rothbard (read online or purchase)

Rollback by Thomas E. Woods

A Short History of Money and Banking by William Gouge

Democratick Editorials by William Leggett (edited by Lawrence H. White)

Mises Wiki (an ongoing project)
Panic of 1792
Panic of 1796-97
Panic of 1819
Panic of 1825
Panic of 1837
Panic of 1847
Panic of 1857
Panic of 1866
Panic of 1873
Panic of 1884
Panic of 1890
Panic of 1893
Panic of 1896
 
Last edited:
One line from the first link:
Recessions were in fact not more frequent in the pre-Fed than the post-Fed period.

Does not support the claim that the Fed made things worse. I don't say they perfected the economy- they didn't. They have less control over it than most people think.
 
One line from the first link:


Does not support the claim that the Fed made things worse. I don't say they perfected the economy- they didn't. They have less control over it than most people think.

Your graph, above, doesn't show much in the way of deflation since 1930, just inflation. Would that mean that prices are not returning to an average but instead only increasing?
 
Check out US historical recessions. They actually happened more often before 1913.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions_in_the_United_States

Of the ten early recessions explcitly identified in this article. only one (the recession of 1812) occurred outside the tenure of a central bank.

1791-1811 (First Bank of the United States)
recessions:
- 1789-1793 (mixed; started 2 years prior to 1st Bank charter; ended 2 years after)
- 1796-1799
- 1802-1804
- 1807-1810

1816-1836 (Second Bank of the United States)
recessions:
- 1815-1821 (mixed; started 1 year prior to 2nd Bank charter; ended 5 years after)
- 1822-1823
- 1825-1826
- 1828-1829
- 1833-1834

As for the post-2nd-US-Bank period: the article explicitly notes the existence & influence of factors which served to induce artificial expansions of credit (such as "unit banking" laws prohibiting branch banking).

IOW: This Wikipedia article only serves to confirm & elaborate upon what I said in post #7.


Completely setting aside the issue of whether (or to what extent) "price inflation" can be so simply & straighforwardly equated or correlated with "boom-bust cycle" (and also leaving aside the question of how accurate or reliable measures of 19th-century price inflation can be in the first place), I repeat: noting the easily-established fact that boom-bust cycles can & have occurred without central banks does nothing to disprove (or even militate against) the claim that central banks are a sufficient material cause of boom-busts.
 
Last edited:
Tom Woods said:
Recessions were in fact not more frequent in the pre-Fed than the post-Fed period.

Does not support the claim that the Fed made things worse.

You are missing Woods' point. A common claim made by pro-Fed advocates is that recessions were more frequent (and severe) prior to the existence of the Federal Reserve system than they were afterwards. Woods is here arguing against the the twin claims that:

(1) recessions were more frequent in the pre-Fed period, and
(2) the Fed is responsible for recessions being less frequent in the post-Fed period.

IOW: In the particular argument from which you cite, Woods is not trying to show that the Fed made things worse (though he does try to do that elsewhere). He is arguing against the notion that the Fed made things better (which is his opponents' claim). There's a difference ...

I don't say they perfected the economy- they didn't. They have less control over it than most people think.

Then at least in this instance, you should actually be agreeing with Woods' criticism of these particular Fed defenders' claims. They are saying that the Fed does have control over the economy - at least enough to fend off or significantly mitgate against recessions (if not more) ...
 
Last edited:
Your graph, above, doesn't show much in the way of deflation since 1930, just inflation. Would that mean that prices are not returning to an average but instead only increasing?
Exactly and the busts where short, because there was less intervention into the economy by the government and none by a central bank when there wasn't a central bank.
http://mises.org/books/historyofmoney.pdf
The link is a pdf. "A History of Money and Banking in the United States: The Colonial Era to World War II" by Murray N. Rothbard. The book goes into detail on these business cycles pre and post central bank. If anyone is interested.
http://www.amazon.com/History-Money-Banking-United-States/dp/0945466331

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgB8TiOXq5U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKlVqiWU3mk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIcR2TFPGAI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmQkyyJ7iPg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VhyvelxSzo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAOIrx0Abbo
 
Last edited:
Exactly and the busts where short, because there was less intervention into the economy by the government and none by a central bank when there wasn't a central bank.
http://mises.org/books/historyofmoney.pdf
The link is a pdf. "A History of Money and Banking in the United States: The Colonial Era to World War II" by Murray N. Rothbard. The book goes into detail on these business cycles pre and post central bank. If anyone is interested.
http://www.amazon.com/History-Money-Banking-United-States/dp/0945466331

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgB8TiOXq5U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKlVqiWU3mk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIcR2TFPGAI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmQkyyJ7iPg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VhyvelxSzo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAOIrx0Abbo


Rothbard's book on banking was going to be my next purchase, actually. Right now I'm mired in Man, Economy, and State, which is something I'd like to see in more classrooms.

I know I can read it at mises.org, but I just really enjoy reading from an actual book and expanding my small collection.
 
Back
Top