The Fed

RideTheDirt

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
1,988
I am writing an essay for my political science class right now and I Am collecting a lot of info on the fed. I need a legitimate source for the creation in 1910! It is a political science class, and the professor focuses heavily on political strategy, and the reason why things happen, which I love! I can show him why the FED should be ABOLISHED.

I'm using Ron Paul's bill, and the last clause in the federal reserve act as proof it could happen, and why it would benefit everyone to do so.

Anyone have a good source on it's creation?
 
you need to express order "the case against the fed" and "the creature from jekyll island" get some for your prof too
 
Look up the Panic of 1907... "Bank Run"

This is when JP Morgan and the Banksters laid the foundation for 1913's Federal Reserve Act.
 
I am writing an essay for my political science class right now and I Am collecting a lot of info on the fed. I need a legitimate source for the creation in 1910! It is a political science class, and the professor focuses heavily on political strategy, and the reason why things happen, which I love! I can show him why the FED should be ABOLISHED.

I'm using Ron Paul's bill, and the last clause in the federal reserve act as proof it could happen, and why it would benefit everyone to do so.

Anyone have a good source on it's creation?

You might be able to pull documentation off the web about Jekyll Island. That should lead you to quotable information. I've got an even better one for you. Contact G. Edward Griffin directly and perhaps he can scan the actual newspaper articles from the 1930s about the creation of the Fed, or direct you to them. You should be able to either find articles online, or at a good library with a Newspaper Database.

Don't forget a good chart showing the devaluation of the dollar over the years. Without question, it shows exactly what has happened to the dollar. Don't forget to mention about the 10 cent/Gallon for Gasloline (WITH FULL SERVICE!! DO *YOU* EVEN KNOW WHAT THIS IS?!?! ATTENDANT/S WOULD CHECK YOUR TIRE PRESSURE, CHECK YOUR OIL, CLEAN YOUR WINDOWS, AND PUMP YOUR GAS!!), 5 cent/Cup of Coffee, etc., as that's what things USED to cost. I've seen the chart on RPF.



FF
 
Last edited:
A brief summary of its founding- you will want to research deeper: http://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/history_article.html
Early 1900's: The Creation of the Federal Reserve System


In 1907, a severe financial panic jolted Wall Street and forced several banks into failure. This panic, however, did not trigger a broad financial collapse. Yet the simultaneous occurrence of general prosperity with a crisis in the nation's financial centers persuaded many Americans that their banking structure was sadly out of date and in need of major reform.


In 1908, the Congress created the National Monetary Commission. This Commission, led by Nelson W. Aldrich and composed of members of the House of Representatives and the Senate, was charged with making a comprehensive study of the necessary and desirable changes to the banking system of the United States. The resulting plan called for a National Reserve Association, which would be dominated by the banking industry. This plan was treated with great skepticism and received very little public support.


In 1912, the House Banking and Currency Committee held hearings to examine the control of the banking and financial resources of the nation. The Committee concluded that America's banking and financial system were in the hands of a "money trust." The Committee's report defined a "money trust" as "an established and well defined identity and community of interest between a few leaders of finance . . .which has resulted in a vast and growing concentration of control of money and credit in the hands of a comparatively few men." The public's awareness of a monopoly on the banking system was crucial in leading to America's financial reform.


Another key event leading to America's financial reform was the election of Woodrow Wilson as President in 1912. Wilson and his Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan, forcefully opposed "any plan which concentrates control in the hands of the banks."


On December 26, 1912, the Glass-Willis proposal was submitted to President-elect Wilson. Instead of suggesting the creation of a central bank, the proposal called for the creation of twenty or more privately controlled regional reserve banks, which would hold a portion of member banks' reserves, perform other central banking functions and issue currency against commercial assets and gold. Wilson approved of this idea, but also insisted upon the creation of a central board to control and coordinate the work of the regional reserve banks.


Top


The Federal Reserve Act of 1913




The Federal Reserve Act presented by Congressman Carter Glass and Senator Robert L. Owen incorporated modifications by Woodrow Wilson and allowed for a regional Federal Reserve System, operating under a supervisory board in Washington, D.C. Congress approved the Act, and President Wilson signed it into law on December 23, 1913. The Act, "Provided for the establishment of Federal Reserve Banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes.

The Act provided for a Reserve Bank Organization Committee that would designate no less than eight but no more than twelve cities to be Federal Reserve cities, and would then divide the nation into districts, each district to contain one Federal Reserve City.


Top

The Dilemma of the New York Fed



The controversies evident in the writing of the Federal Reserve Act were carried over into the selection of the Federal Reserve cities. New York was at the center of this controversy. There was no doubt that New York would receive a Federal Reserve Bank, but the size of the bank to be established there was a highly contentious issue. The city's foremost financiers, such as J.P Morgan, argued that the New York Fed should be of commanding importance, so that it would receive due recognition from the central banks of Europe. The New York Fed that the financiers desired would have approximately half of the capitalization of the entire system.


However, many throughout the country feared that a Federal Reserve Bank of such magnitude would dwarf everything else in the system and would accord far too much power to the New York District. Treasury Secretary William McAdoo and Agriculture Secretary David F. Houston shared this opinion and a belief that the European central banks should deal with the Federal Reserve System as a whole, rather than with just one of its parts.


On April 2, 1914, the Reserve Bank Organization Committee announced its decision, and twelve Federal Reserve banks were established to cover various districts throughout the country. Those opposed to the establishment of an overwhelmingly powerful New York Fed prevailed in their desire that its scope and influence should be limited. Initially, this bank's influence was restricted to New York State. Nonetheless, with over $20,000,000 in capital stock, the New York Bank had nearly four times the capitalization of the smallest banks in the system, such as Atlanta and Minneapolis. As a result, it was impossible to prevent the New York Fed from being the largest and most dominant bank in the system. However, it was considerably smaller than the New York banking community had wanted.
 
If you want to present a balanced report on the value of the dollar be sure to include what has happened to wages as well as prices. Both have gone up. The dollar may have "lost" 90% of its value but the US consumers have not lost 90% of their purchasing power. During some periods wages have grown slower than prices, in other periods wages have grown faster. In the first circumstance, people become worse off and in the second they are better off. Rising prices is only half of the story.
 
If you want to present a balanced report on the value of the dollar be sure to include what has happened to wages as well as prices. Both have gone up. The dollar may have "lost" 90% of its value but the US consumers have not lost 90% of their purchasing power. During some periods wages have grown slower than prices, in other periods wages have grown faster. In the first circumstance, people become worse off and in the second they are better off. Rising prices is only half of the story.


Wages were adjusted over the years due to the devaluation of the dollar. If the essay were to show cost of living based on various time periods, including wages would seem reasonable (for the same job). In this case, he's looking at the creation of the Fed, and how it effected the dollar only. A loaf of bread is a loaf of bread. If I have a much better job than I did 30 years ago, do I consider that, no. I only consider the price of bread over time.


FF
 
I am writing an essay for my political science class right now and I Am collecting a lot of info on the fed. I need a legitimate source for the creation in 1910! It is a political science class, and the professor focuses heavily on political strategy, and the reason why things happen, which I love! I can show him why the FED should be ABOLISHED.

I'm using Ron Paul's bill, and the last clause in the federal reserve act as proof it could happen, and why it would benefit everyone to do so.

Anyone have a good source on it's creation?


You forgot to add the word "sucks" to your thread title.
 
I suggest citing Rothbard, Hayek, and other globally known economists as well as Jekyll Isle stuff.

Don't want to come off conspiratorial.

Remember the fed is a machine for the gov to use to inflate, it's not just an evil private corporation. I like to note that it is technically private because it was understood that the government was not allowed to print money at the time, so we needed to take the loophole and appoint a private bank monopoly money creator/maintainer status.
 
If you want to present a balanced report on the value of the dollar be sure to include what has happened to wages as well as prices. Both have gone up. The dollar may have "lost" 90% of its value but the US consumers have not lost 90% of their purchasing power. During some periods wages have grown slower than prices, in other periods wages have grown faster. In the first circumstance, people become worse off and in the second they are better off. Rising prices is only half of the story.

Are you really sure on that?

Even if the fed could somehow claim any credit for an increase in the standard of living, the increase in productivity brought about by the spread of electricity alone no doubt would dwarf any positive effect from the federal reserve.

Think how much more the standard of living could have risen without the bankers stealing our wealth through inflation to squader it in war and destruction.
 
Are you really sure on that?

Even if the fed could somehow claim any credit for an increase in the standard of living, the increase in productivity brought about by the spread of electricity alone no doubt would dwarf any positive effect from the federal reserve.

Think how much more the standard of living could have risen without the bankers stealing our wealth through inflation to squader it in war and destruction.


I think if we were to look at wage increases, we'd also have to also consider all our increases in costs. That would mean, Federal Taxes, State Taxes, Excise Taxes, Property Taxes, other Fee increases, Health Insurance premiums, Car Insurance premiums, Life Insurance premiums, Social Security withholding, Medicare Withholding, etc., etc., etc. Based on this, there is NO WAY IN HELL we are better off since the creation of the Federal Reserve.


FF
 
Back
Top