- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,558
"Show us the election fraud!"
It's a daunting task to find and prosecute election fraud. It is made even harder when election rules are modified to make election fraud easier for the masses. That is precisely what was done before the 2020 election.
The Distributed Election Fraud Model
When fraud can be widely distributed and compartmentalized, it becomes virtually impossible to catch most cases. While a huge dump of tens or hundreds of thousands of fraudulent ballots may be easier to catch, when the illegal ballots arrive one, two, five or ten at a time, it can not be caught.
How does this happen? The first step is to change the election rules through hook or crook. A state legislature can pass new laws changing the registration and voting rules, validations, and time frames. In other instances, there can be legal challenges and lawsuits, edicts from friendly AG's, Secretaries of State, Election Boards, and Governors. This is exactly what happened in preparation for the 2020 election. The "emergency" of COVID-19 was a convenient excuse that helped in the process. Never let a crisis go to waste.
Once the election rules are sufficiently loose and the seeds of fraud are sewn, it is time for operatives large and small to gather that harvest. In this case, flooding the population with ballots and almost eliminating validations is enough to enable vote fraud. Allowing these ballots to be collected en masse by anyone who has an urge to do so further enables fraud (ballot harvesting).
The ensuing fraud can be as simple as someone filling out ballots for Grandma and Grandpa (alive or dead), to more sophisticated gathering of ballots by corrupt postal workers and activists registering fake voters, or operatives that engage in larger fraud, such as voting for incapacitated residents of a nursing home.
Thus the fraud is widely distributed. It is impossible to find and correct such fraud. Good luck trying to expose these instances of fraud a few at a time. The rules, chain of custody and verification have been eased to a point of being non-existent, and are of no help in catching illegal votes.
A Test Run in California
In 2016, this theory was tested in California. The California Legislature passed new laws to loosen rules on mail-in ballots, and to allow ballot harvesting. This law was signed by Governor Jerry Brown in time for the 2018 midterm elections.
The stage was set, and California was the test bed. The result was that a massive amount of new ballots were cast, and California lost 7 of it's 14 Republican House seats in red districts. It was a huge success, and exceeded expectations!
The National Implementation
With a proven winning strategy, it was time to take it national, especially in swing states. Many states had already implemented some aspects of lax voting methods. With COVID-19 as a catalyst and excuse for wide ranging executive mandates, even more changes could be forced through. Legal actions were also utilized to modify the interpretation of existing laws, or to essentially re-write the law in the courtroom.
And the end result is where we are today. Ballots are coming in from all directions, unsupervised, with absolutely no chain of custody. Instead of finishing counts in a few hours after polls close, counting continues more than a week later in some states.
The election process has become so corrupted, that the US State Department would call it egregious fraud, if it happened in a different nation such as Ukraine.
Stories are rampant about a variety of ballot frauds, statistical red flags, and counting machine glitches. But verifying and proving a single case is exceedingly difficult and time consuming process. Good luck proving even a few cases.
The distributed election fraud model has been implemented, and by design, it is a death by a thousand cuts.
It's a daunting task to find and prosecute election fraud. It is made even harder when election rules are modified to make election fraud easier for the masses. That is precisely what was done before the 2020 election.
The Distributed Election Fraud Model
When fraud can be widely distributed and compartmentalized, it becomes virtually impossible to catch most cases. While a huge dump of tens or hundreds of thousands of fraudulent ballots may be easier to catch, when the illegal ballots arrive one, two, five or ten at a time, it can not be caught.
How does this happen? The first step is to change the election rules through hook or crook. A state legislature can pass new laws changing the registration and voting rules, validations, and time frames. In other instances, there can be legal challenges and lawsuits, edicts from friendly AG's, Secretaries of State, Election Boards, and Governors. This is exactly what happened in preparation for the 2020 election. The "emergency" of COVID-19 was a convenient excuse that helped in the process. Never let a crisis go to waste.
Once the election rules are sufficiently loose and the seeds of fraud are sewn, it is time for operatives large and small to gather that harvest. In this case, flooding the population with ballots and almost eliminating validations is enough to enable vote fraud. Allowing these ballots to be collected en masse by anyone who has an urge to do so further enables fraud (ballot harvesting).
The ensuing fraud can be as simple as someone filling out ballots for Grandma and Grandpa (alive or dead), to more sophisticated gathering of ballots by corrupt postal workers and activists registering fake voters, or operatives that engage in larger fraud, such as voting for incapacitated residents of a nursing home.
Thus the fraud is widely distributed. It is impossible to find and correct such fraud. Good luck trying to expose these instances of fraud a few at a time. The rules, chain of custody and verification have been eased to a point of being non-existent, and are of no help in catching illegal votes.
A Test Run in California
In 2016, this theory was tested in California. The California Legislature passed new laws to loosen rules on mail-in ballots, and to allow ballot harvesting. This law was signed by Governor Jerry Brown in time for the 2018 midterm elections.
The stage was set, and California was the test bed. The result was that a massive amount of new ballots were cast, and California lost 7 of it's 14 Republican House seats in red districts. It was a huge success, and exceeded expectations!
The National Implementation
With a proven winning strategy, it was time to take it national, especially in swing states. Many states had already implemented some aspects of lax voting methods. With COVID-19 as a catalyst and excuse for wide ranging executive mandates, even more changes could be forced through. Legal actions were also utilized to modify the interpretation of existing laws, or to essentially re-write the law in the courtroom.
And the end result is where we are today. Ballots are coming in from all directions, unsupervised, with absolutely no chain of custody. Instead of finishing counts in a few hours after polls close, counting continues more than a week later in some states.
The election process has become so corrupted, that the US State Department would call it egregious fraud, if it happened in a different nation such as Ukraine.
Stories are rampant about a variety of ballot frauds, statistical red flags, and counting machine glitches. But verifying and proving a single case is exceedingly difficult and time consuming process. Good luck proving even a few cases.
The distributed election fraud model has been implemented, and by design, it is a death by a thousand cuts.
Last edited:
