The Consortium Imposing the Growing Censorship Regime

The info is so compelling, Tucker actually changes his facial expression.
 
In this interview, the guy being interviewed handled something called the "cyber portfolio" at the State Dept and now runs a freedom of speech foundation. He gives a detailed description of the censorship apparatus, both in the US and Europe, and explains how and when it was created, which happened under Obama, and how questioning mail in ballots or COVID lockdowns became a legal attack on the cyber infrastructure. One of the most interesting things I found was his describing the establishment's definition of "democracy", which is getting all of the globalists (I'll call them) "stakeholders" (global corporations, NGOs, bureaucrats, international finance, media players, etc) to agree with each other and fuck you, the insignificant useless eater. This is what the WEF does: it brings together all of the aforementioned parties to arrive at a consensus as to how they will lord it over you. "Democracy" refers agreement within their precious institutions, established for them, and not some arcane notion such as government by, for and of the people.


https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1758529993280205039
 
Alex needs to have this guy on.

I find that these types of dudes, former anything, will give some correct info but mix in propaganda.

I'm 3/4 of the way through and I think that everything he's said is legit.
 
In this interview, the guy being interviewed handled something called the "cyber portfolio" at the State Dept and now runs a freedom of speech foundation. He gives a detailed description of the censorship apparatus, both in the US and Europe, and explains how and when it was created, which happened under Obama, and how questioning mail in ballots or COVID lockdowns became a legal attack on the cyber infrastructure. One of the most interesting things I found was his describing the establishment's definition of "democracy", which is getting all of the globalists (I'll call them) "stakeholders" (global corporations, NGOs, bureaucrats, international finance, media players, etc) to agree with each other and fuck you, the insignificant useless eater. This is what the WEF does: it brings together all of the aforementioned parties to arrive at a consensus as to how they will lord it over you. "Democracy" refers agreement within their precious institutions, established for them, and not some arcane notion such as government by, for and of the people.


https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1758529993280205039

That's important to understand because his use of the word democracy can be confusing.

Tucker asks for clarification at the 47 minute mark.
 
Holy shit, that was a BEAST of an interview.

Can't even call it an interview, the guy just extemporaneously rattled off the infrastructure of the Censorship State.
 
Not for nothing, Benz needs to put out like a 100 tweets that he's not suicidal...
 
Not for nothing, Benz needs to put out like a 100 tweets that he's not suicidal...

Amazing interview. Or more like a monologue.

This new breed of censorship is interesting to me because it's dual purpose. On the one hand, they quash stuff they just flat don't like, such as discussion of mail-in ballots. On the other, it's an irritant to stir up conservatives and make them angry, so that can be directed in ways that don't serve our best interest.

IMG_6246.jpeg


They're out to get us hyper-focused on killing this Rainbow Communism Clown Show so that we will walk into the "Nationalist" Fascism trap.

Our government will still be in the hands of multinationals, they'll just be corporate-flavored instead of "NGO"-flavored.
 
Back
Top