The coming pandemic of “gay marriage”

Pres. B O "This is a very courageous and heroic thing we are all doing for America making gay marriages solve all America's problem..... so lets all concentrate and just pour in all the effort into here....the economy is never been better for the last 4 years compare to any previous years, our wars are creating peace and global prosperity.... never mind the false reality those realist gives ya, cause our figures are the only ones you look at..... never mind or just ignore the tyranical police state laws happening, just let it pass, its all to keep you all safe........ never mind the critiques and haters....cause their just jealous of me being the first black and cool, as players gets the goods"
 
The Constitution does not guarantee a "right to privacy" as spelled out in ruling such as Lawrence v Texas and Roe v Wade, so homosexuality can and should be criminalizes. For investigation of all crimes the 4th amendment shoud be followed. If there is probable cause, then a search warrant should be asked for from a judge if the police wishes to violate the privacy of someone's home, car, or papers.


What sort of cognitive dissonance does it take to be in the Liberty Movement while believing that?
 
State laws dictate that hospitals, employers, the state, etc have to recognize certain contracts.

I agree with the liberterian perspective that government shouldn't be involved in marriage. I don't agree with libertarians that government has no role enforcing morality.

So as long as it is enforcing your brand of morality, you're cool with it.

You realize that makes you.... EXACTLY the same as every Democrat and EVERY non-Paul Republican?
 
It's not my morality, it's God's.


That's a very collectivist statement.

God's law...lol. My God says your God's law is tyranny. What do you want to do about it? Make a LAW? Holy crap...literally. Is this whom I share the "liberty" movement with? Calgon, take me away!
 
It's not my morality, it's God's.

It's the same thing.

That's a very collectivist statement.

No, by definition you're enforcing a morality that you endorse onto others by using violence. That's the domain of democrats and republicans, not us. We've got to realize that we do NOT have a right to enforce a set of subjective morals on those who are doing no harm to anyone else. Allowing others their freedom is the only way make ours a reality.
 
Last edited:
Why are people against gay marriage? I still don't get this. I know it has something to do with religion, but could someone explain it to me in a non-"Those homoxexuals practice sin so it must be illegal!" way that I get from about every social conservative I talk to. It always seems more emotional than any logical reason.
 
I don't agree with libertarians that government has no role enforcing morality.

Is the government, by definition, a moral institute? I'd hope that if you feel that a institute should be enforcing morality, that it is moral itself.
 
Marriage should be between one man and one woman. But it should be left to the states. And when the states do vote, the vote against gay marriage. 32 have already done so.
 
Is the government, by definition, a moral institute? I'd hope that if you feel that a institute should be enforcing morality, that it is moral itself.

I say this to every social conservative I encounter and then they just throw a hissy fit. Probably my favorite statement ever.
 
I wish humans would just stop trying to control the peaceful actions of other humans. That is the primary reason why the world is so messed up.
 
Is the government, by definition, a moral institute? I'd hope that if you feel that a institute should be enforcing morality, that it is moral itself.

Yes, because God insituted human government. That humans have perverted this institution is another matter and it is every man's obligation to resist tyranny, but no government has the moral authority to disobey God's laws.
 
Yes, because God insituted human government. That humans have perverted this institution is another matter and it is every man's obligation to resist tyranny, but no government has the moral authority to disobey God's laws.

That's not quite how the story goes... God only instituted human government after warning of the evils that a king would rain upon the people, and that warning was rebuffed. The institution of human government was a curse on the Israelites for their refusal to be directly governed by God and His laws.
 
That's not quite how the story goes... God only instituted human government after warning of the evils that a king would rain upon the people, and that warning was rebuffed. The institution of human government was a curse on the Israelites for their refusal to be directly governed by God and His laws.

Chuck Baldwin wrote a very good article on Romans 13 and government
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin521.htm
 
Yes, because God insituted human government. That humans have perverted this institution is another matter and it is every man's obligation to resist tyranny, but no government has the moral authority to disobey God's laws.

So is theft, kidnapping, and murder moral when done by a government?
 
Back
Top