FreeTraveler
Member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2007
- Messages
- 4,027
trade medallion <> sound money
He paid his employees X US dollars, which were legal tender, where X happened to be less than they would have made anywhere else.All I gotta say is, Robert Kahre tried to beat the IRS out of their due, really has nothing to due with trade medallions.
Bernard von Nothaus committed fraud by representing his Liberty Dollar as a replacement for the US Dollar and by confusing the issue when presenting it to the unsuspecting public (this is called fraud of which he was convicted). Once again has nothing to do with trade medallions.
Not only that; but back when that case was in the news, some enterprising blogger/reporter went to the irs website and used their "ask an agent" feature. They laid out as a hypothetical scenario exactly what Kahre was doing and asked what taxes had to be paid. The response was exactly what Kahre was doing. I don't remember the site, but I do remember the screenshots....He paid his employees X US dollars, which were legal tender, where X happened to be less than they would have made anywhere else.
The legal tender he used was precious metal, which had a market value in fiat dollars of much higher than X.
Yet when calculating taxes, all his employees were legally obligated to report was X.
Assuming that the IRS is due anything - and I'm not really buying "everyone says so" as a valid argument - they were due exactly what they were paid, according to the law.
I used this as an example to show that the federal government has absolutely no concern for what the law says. Deviate from the norm, and you'll get their attention. And their attention will most decidedly not come in the form of closing loopholes through congressional action. It will come in the form of black-clad, trigger-happy psychopaths who are itching for an excuse to find out what color the inside of your head is.
I agree. I wasn't clear. I'm not the one making that lie. That is the lie that will be told in court. It won't be told so brazenly either. They lied about Von Nothaus, and the lied big - they called him a terrorist!In my case, that is simply a lie.
I agree. I wasn't clear. I'm not the one making that lie. That is the lie that will be told in court. It won't be told so brazenly either. They lied about Von Nothaus, and the lied big - they called him a terrorist!
I group in Cape Cod just introduced their new copper coin "C Shell." They intention is to create a local barter community using the AOCS Approved coin.
http://freeindependentsun.com/permanomics/cape-cod-group-establishes-local-sound-currency-the-%e2%80%9cc-shell%e2%80%9d/
Actually, you're leaving out the Tenth Amendment:
This is not a case where anything not expressly forbidden to the States or the Federal Government is somehow available thereto by default. Whatever was not expressly delegated to Congress, nor expressly prohibited to the States, was not reserved to Congress by default, but only reserved to the States or to the people. That is why there was no need to expressly prohibit the Federal government in this matter - and it is also why the Federal Government could not establish the Treasury as its own central bank and printing press. It would have instantly been struck down as unconstitutional, precisely because it was expressly forbidden to the States, but not expressly delegated to the Federal Government. The creation of the Federal Reserve charter was the end around sneak - ("We weren't expressly given powers to do the dirty ourselves, so we'll license someone else to do the dirty for us.") Still unconstitutional as hell, but made it through anyway.
The Tenth Amendment is precisely why, in every Supreme Court Constitutional case involving Federal powers, the Federal government (any branch) must be able to demonstrate that the power they exercised was an extension of powers already expressly delegated to it by the Constitution.
It was the Commerce and Elastic ("Necessary and Proper") clauses of Article 1 Section 8 that got expanded into the Federal behemoth that is our Federal Government today. That was the genie extrapolated from a bottle that gave broad, sweeping powers that were never specifically enumerated in the Constitution.
The Congress shall have power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common defence[note 1] and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current coin of the United States;
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
...I'm more of a bash guy myself.
I agree with fisharmor, the government will do whatever it takes to get it's way, however; that does not mean we should run scared.
I totally disagree with the statement, "The only reason it exists at all (as opposed to simply using FRNs) is to similarly defraud the US government.".
In my case, that is simply a lie. I started Cape Cod C Shells for several reasons, none of them is to defraud the US Government. 1. I see an opportunity to make a profit. 2. I want to help keep money in the community. 3. It helps to benefit local charities. 4. When the fiat dollar collapses, and it will, there will be a community currency in place to fill the gap.