The benefits of World Government, World Citizenship

[Abyss19562]

40 years to late is inaccurate, it's more like 100 or more too late.

If we really wanted to change something we would have to go back in time and kill John Rockefeller and a Rothchild.

The most we can do now is win the presidency and kill David Rockefeller. I've got his address if anyone lives in New York and wants to give it a shot.Hopefully Mr.David Rockefeller dies soon, I mean I think he's about 97 years old or so.

 

[CelestialRender]

Steal his car keys on election day. That is about all you can do with that one.

QFT.

 

[MS0453]

Icon57, if RP is 40 years too late, then why are there more countries in existence today than there were 40 years ago? Why are a good number of secessionist movements more advanced today, than they were 40 years ago? You're friend has it backwards. The world may be getting more connected, but governance is becoming more local. The modern nation-state is toast.

 

[RonPaulalways]

The reason why government is dangerous is that there is nothing more powerful than the government to check it. With a one world government, then there is absolutely nothing in the world that could check a powerful regime that seized the reigns of political power.

Right now on the international scene, if one government is bad, there are other governments that 1) people can live under, and 2) that check the power of the bad government. With one world government, this is not possible.

To see why local government is better than all-encompassing governments, compare the Roman empire to the feudalism/nation states that followed.

The Roman Empire decayed into a corrupt sprawling exploitation machine run by Rome for the benefit of the elite. The provinces were burdened with taxes and military conscription which the politicians in Rome used to serve their private interests. There was no opportunity for any provinces to build themselves up because they had no security from the wolves that controled Rome. A huge empire meant no security for the people inside the empire.

With feudalism/nation states, competition between various states drove progress, and gave people an option to relocate to better governed locales if their local ruler was corrupt. This competition and security from exploitation eventually led to the renaissance, the industrial revolution and a boom that only subsided in 1913 when Rome reemerged as Washington DC.

 

[Naraku]

I disagree, the combined machinery of the state can never overcome the people. That's why all successful fascist states have either attempted to brainwash the people into subservience or divide them amongst each other.

Our corporate media, pop culture, and partisan politics do more to divide the people than any government could cream of doing. Unfortunately most people aren't aware enough to realize how completely ridiculous this setup is right now.

“The most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.” – Steve Biko, Founder of the The Black Consciousness Movement

After all, Mao used the mass line and mobilized student activists against liberal reformists and these Red Guards were responsible for some of the most brutal and destructive actions during the Cultural Revolution.

 

[Hardrock]

In the 1950s they would have called that guy a Communist.

Today, he would probably be referred to as a Progressive Liberal,
or simply "Progressive."

I haven't yet decided if this is a personality disorder, a birth defect,
or simply an example of one's ability to be educated beyond their intelligence.

At any rate, the idea is "If it's not busted, keep "fixing" it until it is!"

 

[Nicketas]

,.,.

 

[Nicketas]

,.,.

 

[kushaze]

We won't need a united world until we have a common enemy, you know, when the aliens attack.

Yeah its like that corny movie They Live

 

[nosebruise]

haha that guy in the first post must be living under the world government on the planet Utopia.

 

[C4talyst]

He claimed all world citizens be able to relocate wherever they wish without immigration hassles.

If this was one of his _top_ reasons for thinking it's a good idea now...

'nuff said.

I believe a one-world government could greatly benefit the planet...a hundred years or so from now. If that's to happen, it should form naturally and not be forced on everyone.

 

[INforRP]

Except that their goal is not One World Government, I have heard David Rockefeller flatly make that statement. I believe his words were, "no I don't believe I have ever said that". I think it is in the same video interview (maybe with benjamin fulford), where D. Rockefeller is told by the interviewer about this Ron Paul guy who wants to do away with the Federal Reserve.

What they want is One World Governance, these people have gotten much more bold in their assertions. There will be no voting, or expressing of your opinion, these "overlords" do not think the people should have any say whatsoever. The governance will be solely by the whims of the elite bankers. They think they have all the knowledge about what is best for this planet.

 

[abruzz0]

The title of this thread mentioned benefits

I don't see any

 

[Deborah K]

Leave him to his delusions. He sounds like a lost cause.

 

[Deborah K]

Except that their goal is not One World Government, I have heard David Rockefeller flatly make that statement. I believe his words were, "no I don't believe I have ever said that". I think it is in the same video interview (maybe with benjamin fulford), where D. Rockefeller is told by the interviewer about this Ron Paul guy who wants to do away with the Federal Reserve.

What they want is One World Governance, these people have gotten much more bold in their assertions. There will be no voting, or expressing of your opinion, these "overlords" do not think the people should have any say whatsoever. The governance will be solely by the whims of the elite bankers. They think they have all the knowledge about what is best for this planet.

Sounds like a page right out of George Orwell's "1984".

 

[kgiese]

Quickly move about. Like in America? Home of freedom and liberty. Checkpoints/tollbooths on highways, searches of property and person in airports. "Free to move about", I am suprised stasis, or locked in cage isn't a travel option.

Look you have one vote. Use it as you please. Open your eyes and look around. Do you like what you see? If not cast your vote.

 

[abruzz0]

Allow me to translate

THE MESSAGE OF THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES

1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.
10.Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.

The Message of the Georgia Misguidedstones

1.) Kill off 95% of the population by whatever means necessary to allow an easier way to control them
2.) One child policies, with the government throwing you in jail if you don't eat, drink, and take the vaccinations they force upon you
3.) lol, Tower of Bable
4.) You will believe what we tell you to believe, and you will conform
5.) Do as we say. Our authority is unquestionable.
6.) Supreme Court of the UN, forcing nations to do whatever they tell them to. Perhaps even go to war? (resolutions)
7.) This will be eliminated by surveillance everywhere
8.) Sacrifice liberty for the "greater good"
9.) Attempt to legislate virtue
10.) A tax on breathing

 

[patriot4paul]

The Bible prophesied a world government which would be headed up by none other than the Antichrist himself - the most ruthless dictator in the history of the world!

 

[Mini-Me]

If this was one of his _top_ reasons for thinking it's a good idea now...

'nuff said.

I believe a one-world government could greatly benefit the planet...a hundred years or so from now. If that's to happen, it should form naturally and not be forced on everyone.

Your ideas contradict...government by its very nature is force, so the only way for one-world government to occur is by force. Furthermore, one-world government will never, ever be beneficial for anyone except those at the top, because centralization of power is and always will be the most dangerous and tyrannical force on earth.

 

[John of Des Moines]

Ask your co-worker to read Articles 29 and 30 of the UN Charter. The first 28 articles grant all sorts of rights andf freedoms but 29 and 30 taken them away. Also separate nations act like bulkheads of a ship - one can flood with tyranny but the ship still floats.