The 15 Most Diverse Counties in the US

[Anti Federalist]

The 15 Most Diverse Counties in the U.S.

https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/slideshows/the-15-most-diverse-counties-in-the-us?slide=17

1. Hawaii County, Hawaii
2. Maui County, Hawaii
3. Queens County, New York
4. Kauai County, Hawaii
5. Fort Bend County, Texas
6. Solano County, California
7 (tie). Alameda County, California
7 (tie). Gwinnett County, Georgia
9. Kings County, New York
10. Prince William County, Virginia
11. Honolulu County, Hawaii
12. (tie). Montgomery County, Maryland
12. (tie). Robeson County, North Carolina
14. Sacramento County, California
15. Contra Costa County, California

 

[Anti Federalist]

And my little county in NH, probably one of the least "diverse" in the nation, rates higher than the number one pick, and most of all the rest as well.

https://www.usnews.com/news/healthiest-communities/new-hampshire/carroll-county

#265 out of the 3242 counties across the country.

 

[PAF]

In MY neck of the woods, we’re it not for friends who came over from Iran, a few who migrated from Mexico, a married couple from Columbia, and others, I’d be losing my GD mind. They came here believing the hype about freedom and prosperity. We all have one thing in common; get rid of both the right and left jack boots, and for government to leave us the f&ck alone.

Instead of hating on and alienating people as groups, best be looking for allies and work your local levels. Otherwise, the Libs and the old bags/old war vet husbands will continue to wreck this country; they’ve already done a helluva job.

Nationalism, Communism, they’re both the same damned thing to me.

 

[DamianTV]

In MY neck of the woods, we’re it not for friends who came over from Iran, a few who migrated from Mexico, a married couple from Columbia, and others, I’d be losing my GD mind. They came here believing the hype about freedom and prosperity. We all have one thing in common; get rid of both the right and left jack boots, and for government to leave us the f&ck alone.

Instead of hating on and alienating people as groups, best be looking for allies and work your local levels. Otherwise, the Libs and the old bags/old war vet husbands will continue to wreck this country; they’ve already done a helluva job.

Nationalism, Communism, they’re both the same damned thing to me.

There are only TWO types of people in the world that ANYONE needs to be concerned with. The ratio of these two types of people is no where close to 50/50, its more like 1 to 4 in 100.

The two types of people are:

• The type that just wants to be left alone
• The type that just wont ever leave YOU alone

Tell me I am wrong.

 

[PAF]

There are only TWO types of people in the world that ANYONE needs to be concerned with. The ratio of these two types of people is no where close to 50/50, its more like 1 to 4 in 100.

The two types of people are:

• The type that just wants to be left alone
• The type that just wont ever leave YOU alone

Tell me I am wrong.

 

[trey4sports]

I knew Gwinnett would be there. That's where I am.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

I lived in Kings County. Shithole city dwellers.

 

[TheTexan]

Nationalism, Communism, they’re both the same damned thing to me.

If you hate Nationalism, you basically hate culture.

A "nation", as I define it, is basically a group of people who share a set of values/culture that are distinct from the values/cultures around it.

Not everyone in the world has the same values (and nor should they), so it's only natural that nations can and should exist. It's also natural that people in those nations would want to limit immigration, in order to preserve their values/culture.

 

[TheTexan]

//

 

[PAF]

If you hate Nationalism, you basically hate culture.

A "nation", as I define it, is basically a group of people who share a set of values/culture that are distinct from the values/cultures around it.

Not everyone in the world has the same values (and nor should they), so it's only natural that nations can and should exist. It's also natural that people in those nations would want to limit immigration, in order to preserve their values/culture.

I worry about my own culture; myself, immediate family, traditions that we might entertain. I don't give a rat about the family across the street, other side of town, or in the next city over.

The declaration of Independence is good. I am an individual. But if you think I am going to kowtow to "nationaism" [which is communism], what the "majority" of "republicans" stand for... think again.

It is MY right to decide who to associate with. If Mexicans, Iranians, whoever, have the same core beliefs I have, I would much rather hang with them. The ones I know, who came here believing in individual liberty, were on the Ron Paul campaign trail with me in 2012. They no more believe in "taking one for the team" than I do. I associate with Caucasians [which I am] and other if they believe the same.

Look at the landscape; Republicans on this side, democrats on the other, throw in some Independents, Constitution Party and others, very few if any hold my core values. One thing in common is that they squeeze the crap out of me from all angles.

The problem is, people are so conditioned that they feel important, belong to a "special group", a "duty" to others or a country, and sacrifice any sense of individual liberty. That is what this "nation" consists of, and makes absolute certain that it is taught in "public school".

 

[TheTexan]

I worry about my own culture; myself, immediate family, traditions that we might entertain. I don't give a rat about the family across the street, other side of town, or in the next city over.

You should give a rat. Because even in an an-cap utopia, your rights will have limits that are determined by the people who live next to you, and in your community.

It is MY right to decide who to associate with. If Mexicans, Iranians, whoever, have the same core beliefs I have, I would much rather hang with them. The ones I know, who came here believing in individual liberty, were on the Ron Paul campaign trail with me in 2012. They no more believe in "taking one for the team" than I do. I associate with Caucasians [which I am] and other if they believe the same.

It is your right to decide who to associate with, on your property. However, you don't own property in the US (or anywhere, really).

So if you want the right to decide who to associate with, own some property first. Then we can talk.

I fully support your right to declare your current land as your own, but then you must be prepared to also be responsible for any externalities caused by allowing guests on your property. Which is its own complex discussion. But generally speaking, you would at that point be responsible for making sure your guests stay on your property. If the guests you invite over onto your property routinely trespass and steal on other people's property, other landowners have every right to block your guests from accessing your property.

With ownership comes responsibilities.

In practice it is not possible for you to fulfill these obligations on your current parcel of land that you presumably want to declare ownership of. If you were to have however the funds/resources to cover the externalities of allowing open borders onto your personal parcel of land, then however, by all means, import as many immigrants as you want, on your land. Just be prepared to keep them, on your land, or other authorized parcels of land.

 

[PAF]

You should give a rat. Because even in an an-cap utopia, your rights will have limits that are determined by the people who live next to you, and in your community.



It is your right to decide who to associate with, on your property. However, you don't own property in the US (or anywhere, really).

So if you want the right to decide who to associate with, own some property first. Then we can talk.

I fully support your right to declare your current land as your own, but then you must be prepared to also be responsible for any externalities caused by allowing guests on your property. Which is its own complex discussion. But generally speaking, you would at that point be responsible for making sure your guests stay on your property. If the guests you invite over onto your property routinely trespass and steal on other people's property, other landowners have every right to block your guests from accessing your property.

With ownership comes responsibilities.

In practice it is not possible for you to fulfill these obligations on your current parcel of land that you presumably want to declare ownership of. If you were to have however the funds/resources to cover the externalities of allowing open borders onto your personal parcel of land, then however, by all means, import as many immigrants as you want, on your land. Just be prepared to keep them, on your land, or other authorized parcels of land.

No, I truly don't give a rat.

What I do with MY property is MY business, NOT yours, the neighbor, or the government. And YES, I do own property. Your government EXTORTS money from me and it, to fulfil its own wants and needs.

What my guests do OFF of my property is not my problem. If they violate or steal from somebody, commit aggression or other, the person who was aggressed has every right to compensation.

Don't confuse public land with private property. Otherwise, point one finger, three fingers back at you. Government has no interest in you or your rights, other than as a means to collect extortion.

 

[TheTexan]

What my guests do OFF of my property is not my problem. If they violate or steal from somebody, commit aggression or other, the person who was aggressed has every right to compensation.

If your property is essentially a base of operations for criminal activity on other people's property, then absolutely, it either is your problem, or it will become your problem, when your neighbors make it your problem.

No, I truly don't give a rat.

Ok then you are either 1) an idiot, or 2) saying stupid shit for the sake of appearing pure, or 3) have not thought it through at all

You clearly do give a rat, because if you had the choice of being surrounded by, 1) 300 million statists who self-identify as American nationalists, or 2) 300 million an-cap's who prefer to live and let others live,

You would clearly choose #2 to be surrounded by an-caps.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just assume that you haven't really thought it through to understand what you are actually saying.

 

[TheTexan]

Don't confuse public land with private property. Otherwise, point one finger, three fingers back at you. Government has no interest in you or your rights, other than as a means to collect extortion.

There is no such thing as public land. Except arguably oceans, nature reserves, and antarctica.

 

[PAF]

If your property is essentially a base of operations for criminal activity on other people's property, then absolutely, it either is your problem, or it will become your problem, when your neighbors make it your problem.



Ok then you are either 1) an idiot, or 2) saying stupid $#@! for the sake of appearing pure, or 3) have not thought it through at all

You clearly do give a rat, because if you had the choice of being surrounded by, 1) 300 million statists who self-identify as American nationalists, or 2) 300 million an-cap's who prefer to live and let others live,

You would clearly choose #2 to be surrounded by an-caps.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just assume that you haven't really thought it through to understand what you are actually saying.

I will presume you are much younger than I am. I have had a full life to contemplate, "vote harder", dealt with government, all aspects of life.

Yes, I would clearly choose #2 to be surrounded by an-caps. Right now, I am indeed surrounded by 300 million statists who self-identify as American nationalists-communists. I can't stand any of them, so I mind my business the best I can. And before you aggress against me and tell me to move: 1. don't tell me what to do. 2. no matter where in the world you go, governments exists, and you will be EXTORTED one way or the other. Changing the hearts and minds of People is the only way to defeat STATISM. Some are willing, most are too brainwashed.

 

[PAF]

There is no such thing as public land. Except arguably oceans, nature reserves, and antarctica.

I didn't make that way. YOU did. I believe in contract rights, property rights and deeds. If you don't directly own the property, nobody should expect you to pay for or maintain it, much less restrict others from traveling freely across it.

 

[TheTexan]

And before you aggress against me and tell me to move: 1. don't tell me what to do. 2. no matter where in the world you go, governments exists, and you will be EXTORTED one way or the other. Changing the hearts and minds of People is the only way to defeat STATISM. Some are willing, most are too brainwashed.

I'm not telling or suggesting you to move.

I'm merely pointing out the obvious: who your neighbors are, matters.

 

[TheTexan]

I didn't make that way. YOU did.

I did what now? What did I do?

I believe in contract rights, property rights and deeds. If you don't directly own the property, nobody should expect you to pay for or maintain it, much less restrict others from traveling freely across it.

Great. I agree.

 

[PAF]

I'm not telling or suggesting you to move.

I'm merely pointing out the obvious: who your neighbors are, matters.

I have 1 older neighbor who is a full-blown lib. She understands my positions and leaves me alone, aside from bringing me soup from time to time. The more I speak with her, the more she sees my point of view, and on occasion even agrees with me.

 

[PAF]

I did what now? What did I do?



Great. I agree.

+ Rep